Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.4 V8 32V | 200 L | 40 L to 1 s | 2.1x | 59x | -278L |
Vehicle | 3.4 V8 32V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 200 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 40 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 2.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 59x |
Difference with world average | -278L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.4 i V8 32V | 200 L | 39 L to 1 s | 2.3x | 59x | -278L |
Vehicle | 3.4 i V8 32V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 200 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 39 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 2.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 59x |
Difference with world average | -278L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.4 i V8 32V | 200 L | 38 L to 1 s | 2.1x | 59x | -278L |
Vehicle | 3.4 i V8 32V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 200 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 38 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 2.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 59x |
Difference with world average | -278L |