Ferrari Mondial Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Quick notes on Ferrari Mondial trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 300 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 6.7 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 3 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 150 L
    • Max trunk load: 90 kg
    • Interior transformation: none
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 1 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 0.9 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 4 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 3.4 i V8 32V : 1 L/hp (1.4 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 3.4 i V8 32V : 1.18 L/km-h (0.73 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 3.4 i V8 32V : 25.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    3.4 i V8 32V 300 L 50 L to 1 s 3.1x 88x -178L
    Vehicle 3.4 i V8 32V
    Trunk space 300 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 50 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 3.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 88x
    Difference with world average -178L

    Quick notes on Ferrari Mondial trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 300 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 6.7 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 3 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 150 L
      • Max trunk load: 93 kg
      • Interior transformation: none
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 1 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 0.9 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 4 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 3.4 i V8 32V : 1 L/hp (1.4 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 3.4 i V8 32V : 1.13 L/km-h (0.7 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 3.4 i V8 32V : 25.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    3.4 i V8 32V 300 L 50 L to 1 s 3.5x 88x -178L
    Vehicle 3.4 i V8 32V
    Trunk space 300 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 50 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 3.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 88x
    Difference with world average -178L