Fiat Brava Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Choose Generation

Quick notes on Fiat Brava trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 380 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 8.4 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 3.8 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 76 L
    • Max trunk load: 66 kg
    • Interior transformation: flexible
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 4.2 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 2.6 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.6 16V : 4.2 L/hp (5.8 L/kW)
  • 1.2 16V 80 : 4.6 L/hp (6.3 L/kW)
  • 1.4 : 5.1 L/hp (6.9 L/kW)
  • 1.4 12 V : 4.8 L/hp (6.4 L/kW)
  • 1.8 GT 16V : 3.4 L/hp (4.6 L/kW)
  • 1.9 JTD 105 : 3.6 L/hp (4.9 L/kW)
  • 1.9 TD 100 S : 3.8 L/hp (5.1 L/kW)
  • 1.9 TD 75S : 5.1 L/hp (6.9 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.6 16V : 2.15 L/km-h (1.34 L/mph)
  • 1.2 16V 80 : 2.2 L/km-h (1.37 L/mph)
  • 1.4 : 2.26 L/km-h (1.4 L/mph)
  • 1.4 12 V : 2.24 L/km-h (1.39 L/mph)
  • 1.8 GT 16V : 2 L/km-h (1.24 L/mph)
  • 1.9 JTD 105 : 2.05 L/km-h (1.27 L/mph)
  • 1.9 TD 100 S : 2.11 L/km-h (1.31 L/mph)
  • 1.9 TD 75S : 2.3 L/km-h (1.43 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.6 16V : 50.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.4 : 52.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.4 12 V : 54.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.9 TD 75S : 63.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.6 16V 380 L 34 L to 1 s 7.6x 240x -98L
    1.2 16V 80 380 L 31 L to 1 s 7.6x 306x -98L
    1.4 380 L 29 L to 1 s 7.6x 277x -98L
    1.4 12 V 380 L 33 L to 1 s 7.6x 277x -98L
    1.8 GT 16V 380 L 39 L to 1 s 7.6x 218x -98L
    1.9 JTD 105 380 L 38 L to 1 s 6.3x 199x -98L
    1.9 TD 100 S 380 L 36 L to 1 s 6.3x 199x -98L
    1.9 TD 75S 380 L 26 L to 1 s 6.3x 199x -98L
    Vehicle 1.6 16V
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 34 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 240x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 1.2 16V 80
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 31 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 306x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 1.4
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 29 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 277x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 1.4 12 V
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 33 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 277x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 1.8 GT 16V
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 39 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 218x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 1.9 JTD 105
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 38 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 199x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 1.9 TD 100 S
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 36 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 199x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 1.9 TD 75S
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 26 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 199x
    Difference with world average -98L