Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 16V | 295 L | 34 L to 1 s | 4.7x | 169x | -183L |
2.0 16V Turbo | 295 L | 42 L to 1 s | 4.9x | 148x | -183L |
2.0 20V Turbo | 295 L | 49 L to 1 s | 4.7x | 148x | -183L |
2.0 16V | 295 L | 34 L to 1 s | 4.9x | 148x | -183L |
2.0 20V | 295 L | 37 L to 1 s | 4.7x | 148x | -183L |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 295 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 34 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 169x |
Difference with world average | -183L |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V Turbo |
Trunk space | 295 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 42 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 148x |
Difference with world average | -183L |
Vehicle | 2.0 20V Turbo |
Trunk space | 295 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 49 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 148x |
Difference with world average | -183L |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Trunk space | 295 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 34 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 148x |
Difference with world average | -183L |
Vehicle | 2.0 20V |
Trunk space | 295 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 37 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 148x |
Difference with world average | -183L |