Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 16V | 270 L | 25 L to 1 s | 5.4x | 169x | -208L |
2.0 16V MULTIJET | 270 L | 25 L to 1 s | 5.4x | 138x | -208L |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 270 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 25 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 169x |
Difference with world average | -208L |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V MULTIJET |
Trunk space | 270 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 25 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 138x |
Difference with world average | -208L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 i 16V | 270 L | - | 5.4x | 170x | -208L |
1.9 Multijet | 270 L | - | 5.4x | 141x | -208L |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 270 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 170x |
Difference with world average | -208L |
Vehicle | 1.9 Multijet |
Trunk space | 270 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 141x |
Difference with world average | -208L |