Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 16V | 324 L | 28 L to 1 s | 4.1x | 162x | -154L |
3.0 V6 24V | 324 L | 33 L to 1 s | 4.1x | 110x | -154L |
2.2 16V JTD | 324 L | 27 L to 1 s | 4.1x | 149x | -154L |
2.0 16V JTD | 324 L | 26 L to 1 s | 4.1x | 162x | -154L |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 324 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 28 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 162x |
Difference with world average | -154L |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 24V |
Trunk space | 324 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 33 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 110x |
Difference with world average | -154L |
Vehicle | 2.2 16V JTD |
Trunk space | 324 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 27 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 149x |
Difference with world average | -154L |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V JTD |
Trunk space | 324 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 26 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 162x |
Difference with world average | -154L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 | 340 L | 25 L to 1 s | 4.3x | 193x | -138L |
2.0 | 340 L | 27 L to 1 s | 4.3x | 170x | -138L |
1.9 TD | 340 L | 23 L to 1 s | 4.3x | 178x | -138L |
2.0 JTD | 340 L | 26 L to 1 s | 4.3x | 170x | -138L |
2.0 Turbo | 340 L | 35 L to 1 s | 4.3x | 170x | -138L |
2.1 TD | 340 L | 27 L to 1 s | 4.3x | 163x | -138L |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 340 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 25 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 193x |
Difference with world average | -138L |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Trunk space | 340 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 27 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 170x |
Difference with world average | -138L |
Vehicle | 1.9 TD |
Trunk space | 340 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 23 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 178x |
Difference with world average | -138L |
Vehicle | 2.0 JTD |
Trunk space | 340 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 26 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 170x |
Difference with world average | -138L |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo |
Trunk space | 340 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 35 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 170x |
Difference with world average | -138L |
Vehicle | 2.1 TD |
Trunk space | 340 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 27 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 163x |
Difference with world average | -138L |