Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 16V GL | 255 L | - | 4.6x | 129x | -223L |
2.0i 16V | 480 L | - | 7.9x | 241x | +2L |
2.5i 24V GL | 480 L | - | 7.9x | 192x | +2L |
2.5i V6 24V LX | 255 L | - | 4.6x | 100x | -223L |
2.5 i V6 24V SVT | 395 L | 59 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 155x | -83L |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V GL |
---|---|
Trunk space | 255 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 129x |
Difference with world average | -223L |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
Trunk space | 480 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 241x |
Difference with world average | +2L |
Vehicle | 2.5i 24V GL |
Trunk space | 480 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 192x |
Difference with world average | +2L |
Vehicle | 2.5i V6 24V LX |
Trunk space | 255 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 100x |
Difference with world average | -223L |
Vehicle | 2.5 i V6 24V SVT |
Trunk space | 395 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 59 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 155x |
Difference with world average | -83L |