Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.4 | 1359 L | - | 8.1x | 252x | +881L |
6.0 TD | 1359 L | - | 8.2x | 228x | +881L |
5.4 L | 1359 L | - | 8.1x | 252x | +881L |
6.8 | 1359 L | - | 8.1x | 201x | +881L |
7.3 TD | 1359 L | - | 8.1x | 187x | +881L |
Vehicle | 5.4 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 1359 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 252x |
Difference with world average | +881L |
Vehicle | 6.0 TD |
Trunk space | 1359 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 228x |
Difference with world average | +881L |
Vehicle | 5.4 L |
Trunk space | 1359 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 252x |
Difference with world average | +881L |
Vehicle | 6.8 |
Trunk space | 1359 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 201x |
Difference with world average | +881L |
Vehicle | 7.3 TD |
Trunk space | 1359 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 187x |
Difference with world average | +881L |