Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 EcoBoost V6 | 547 L | - | 6.2x | 156x | +69L |
Vehicle | 3.5 EcoBoost V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 547 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 156x |
Difference with world average | +69L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 EcoBoost V6 | 971 L | - | 9.1x | 278x | +493L |
Vehicle | 3.5 EcoBoost V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 971 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 278x |
Difference with world average | +493L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.6 i V8 16V | 571 L | 58 L to 1 s | 5.4x | 124x | +93L |
5.4 i V8 16 L 4WD | 571 L | - | 5.4x | 106x | +93L |
4.6 i V8 16V 4WD | 571 L | 57 L to 1 s | 5.4x | 124x | +93L |
5.4 i V8 16V L | 571 L | 63 L to 1 s | 5.4x | 106x | +93L |
5.4 i V8 32V | 571 L | - | 5.4x | 106x | +93L |
5.4 i V8 32V 4WD | 571 L | - | 5.4x | 106x | +93L |
Vehicle | 4.6 i V8 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 571 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 58 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 124x |
Difference with world average | +93L |
Vehicle | 5.4 i V8 16 L 4WD |
Trunk space | 571 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 106x |
Difference with world average | +93L |
Vehicle | 4.6 i V8 16V 4WD |
Trunk space | 571 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 57 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 124x |
Difference with world average | +93L |
Vehicle | 5.4 i V8 16V L |
Trunk space | 571 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 63 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 106x |
Difference with world average | +93L |
Vehicle | 5.4 i V8 32V |
Trunk space | 571 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 106x |
Difference with world average | +93L |
Vehicle | 5.4 i V8 32V 4WD |
Trunk space | 571 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 106x |
Difference with world average | +93L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.6 i V8 16V XLT | 1770 L | 169 L to 1 s | 18.1x | 385x | +1292L |
5.4 i V8 16V | 1725 L | 182 L to 1 s | 15.3x | 320x | +1247L |
4.6 i V8 16V XLT 4WD | 1770 L | 169 L to 1 s | 15.7x | 385x | +1292L |
Vehicle | 4.6 i V8 16V XLT |
---|---|
Trunk space | 1770 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 169 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 18.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 385x |
Difference with world average | +1292L |
Vehicle | 5.4 i V8 16V |
Trunk space | 1725 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 182 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 15.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 320x |
Difference with world average | +1247L |
Vehicle | 4.6 i V8 16V XLT 4WD |
Trunk space | 1770 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 169 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 15.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 385x |
Difference with world average | +1292L |