Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 EcoBoost | 515 L | - | 7.6x | 228x | +37L |
ST 3.0 V6 | 515 L | - | 6.8x | 174x | +37L |
Platinum 3.0 V6 | 515 L | - | 6.8x | 174x | +37L |
3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 330 L | 58 L to 1 s | 4.9x | - | -148L |
3.3 V6 | 515 L | - | 7.6x | 154x | +37L |
Vehicle | 2.3 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Trunk space | 515 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 228x |
Difference with world average | +37L |
Vehicle | ST 3.0 V6 |
Trunk space | 515 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 174x |
Difference with world average | +37L |
Vehicle | Platinum 3.0 V6 |
Trunk space | 515 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 174x |
Difference with world average | +37L |
Vehicle | 3.0 EcoBoost V6 |
Trunk space | 330 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 58 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | - |
Difference with world average | -148L |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
Trunk space | 515 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 154x |
Difference with world average | +37L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 Ti-VCT V6 | 595 L | - | 8.5x | 170x | +117L |
2.3 EcoBoost | 595 L | - | 8.5x | 263x | +117L |
3.5 EcoBoost V6 | 595 L | - | 8.5x | 170x | +117L |
Vehicle | 3.5 Ti-VCT V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 595 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 170x |
Difference with world average | +117L |
Vehicle | 2.3 EcoBoost |
Trunk space | 595 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 263x |
Difference with world average | +117L |
Vehicle | 3.5 EcoBoost V6 |
Trunk space | 595 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 170x |
Difference with world average | +117L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 Ti VCT V6 | 595 L | 72 L to 1 s | 8.5x | 170x | +117L |
3.5 GTDI V6 EcoBoost | 595 L | 98 L to 1 s | 8.5x | 170x | +117L |
Vehicle | 3.5 Ti VCT V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 595 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 72 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 170x |
Difference with world average | +117L |
Vehicle | 3.5 GTDI V6 EcoBoost |
Trunk space | 595 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 98 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 170x |
Difference with world average | +117L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.0i V6 | 391 L | 44 L to 1 s | 4.6x | 98x | -87L |
4.0 i V6 12V 4WD FFV | 391 L | - | 4.6x | 98x | -87L |
4.0 i V6 12V Sport Trac | 391 L | - | 4.6x | 98x | -87L |
4.0 i V6 4WD | 391 L | 40 L to 1 s | 4.6x | 98x | -87L |
4.0 i V6 12V Sport Trac 4WD | 391 L | - | 4.6x | 98x | -87L |
4.6 i V8 24V AWD | 385 L | - | 4.5x | 84x | -93L |
4.6 i V8 24V | 385 L | - | 4.5x | 84x | -93L |
Vehicle | 4.0i V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 391 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 44 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 98x |
Difference with world average | -87L |
Vehicle | 4.0 i V6 12V 4WD FFV |
Trunk space | 391 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 98x |
Difference with world average | -87L |
Vehicle | 4.0 i V6 12V Sport Trac |
Trunk space | 391 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 98x |
Difference with world average | -87L |
Vehicle | 4.0 i V6 4WD |
Trunk space | 391 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 40 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 98x |
Difference with world average | -87L |
Vehicle | 4.0 i V6 12V Sport Trac 4WD |
Trunk space | 391 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 98x |
Difference with world average | -87L |
Vehicle | 4.6 i V8 24V AWD |
Trunk space | 385 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 84x |
Difference with world average | -93L |
Vehicle | 4.6 i V8 24V |
Trunk space | 385 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 84x |
Difference with world average | -93L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.6i V8 | 391 L | 48 L to 1 s | 4.6x | 85x | -87L |
5.4 L 3V | 391 L | - | 4.6x | 72x | -87L |
4.6i V8 4WD | 391 L | 51 L to 1 s | 4.6x | 85x | -87L |
4.0 V6 | 1320 L | 139 L to 1 s | 15.5x | 330x | +842L |
4.6 V8 | 1320 L | - | 15.5x | 287x | +842L |
Vehicle | 4.6i V8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 391 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 48 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 85x |
Difference with world average | -87L |
Vehicle | 5.4 L 3V |
Trunk space | 391 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 72x |
Difference with world average | -87L |
Vehicle | 4.6i V8 4WD |
Trunk space | 391 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 51 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 85x |
Difference with world average | -87L |
Vehicle | 4.0 V6 |
Trunk space | 1320 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 139 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 15.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 330x |
Difference with world average | +842L |
Vehicle | 4.6 V8 |
Trunk space | 1320 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 15.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 287x |
Difference with world average | +842L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.0 V6 4WD | 767 L | - | 10.7x | 194x | +289L |
4.0 V6 | 767 L | - | 10.7x | 194x | +289L |
4.0 XL | 925 L | 76 L to 1 s | 11.1x | 231x | +447L |
4.0 XL 4WD | 925 L | 89 L to 1 s | 11.1x | 231x | +447L |
4.0 XLT | 1205 L | 100 L to 1 s | 14.5x | 304x | +727L |
4.9 XL | 1205 L | 143 L to 1 s | 14.5x | 244x | +727L |
4.0 XLT 4WD | 1205 L | 116 L to 1 s | 14.5x | 302x | +727L |
4.9 XL 4WD | 1205 L | - | 14.5x | 244x | +727L |
5.0 V8 4WD XLT | 1206 L | - | 18.3x | 244x | +728L |
5.0 V8 XLT | 1206 L | - | 18.3x | 244x | +728L |
Vehicle | 4.0 V6 4WD |
---|---|
Trunk space | 767 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 194x |
Difference with world average | +289L |
Vehicle | 4.0 V6 |
Trunk space | 767 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 194x |
Difference with world average | +289L |
Vehicle | 4.0 XL |
Trunk space | 925 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 76 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 231x |
Difference with world average | +447L |
Vehicle | 4.0 XL 4WD |
Trunk space | 925 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 89 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 231x |
Difference with world average | +447L |
Vehicle | 4.0 XLT |
Trunk space | 1205 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 100 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 14.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 304x |
Difference with world average | +727L |
Vehicle | 4.9 XL |
Trunk space | 1205 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 143 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 14.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 244x |
Difference with world average | +727L |
Vehicle | 4.0 XLT 4WD |
Trunk space | 1205 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 116 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 14.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 302x |
Difference with world average | +727L |
Vehicle | 4.9 XL 4WD |
Trunk space | 1205 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 14.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 244x |
Difference with world average | +727L |
Vehicle | 5.0 V8 4WD XLT |
Trunk space | 1206 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 18.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 244x |
Difference with world average | +728L |
Vehicle | 5.0 V8 XLT |
Trunk space | 1206 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 18.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 244x |
Difference with world average | +728L |