2017 Fiesta VIII (Mk8)
2018 Fiesta Active
Fiesta VII Sedan (Mk7)
2013 Fiesta VII (Mk7, facelift 2013)
2009 Fiesta VII (Mk7)
2005 Fiesta (Mk6, 3 door facelift 2005)
2003 Fiesta VI (Mk6, 5 door)
1999 Fiesta V (Mk5, 3 door)
1999 Fiesta V (Mk5, 5 door)
1996 Fiesta IV (Mk4, 5 door)
1996 Fiesta IV (Mk4, 3 door)
1989 Fiesta III (Mk3)
1983 Fiesta II (Mk2)
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 EcoBoost | 303 L | 35 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 304x | -175L |
1.5 TDCI | 303 L | 25 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 202x | -175L |
1.1 | 292 L | 21 L to 1 s | 7x | 269x | -186L |
1.5 TDCi | 292 L | 25 L to 1 s | 7x | 195x | -186L |
ST 1.5 EcoBoost | 311 L | 50 L to 1 s | 7.4x | 208x | -167L |
Vehicle | 1.0 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Trunk space | 303 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 35 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 304x |
Difference with world average | -175L |
Vehicle | 1.5 TDCI |
Trunk space | 303 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 25 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 202x |
Difference with world average | -175L |
Vehicle | 1.1 |
Trunk space | 292 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 21 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 269x |
Difference with world average | -186L |
Vehicle | 1.5 TDCi |
Trunk space | 292 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 25 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 195x |
Difference with world average | -186L |
Vehicle | ST 1.5 EcoBoost |
Trunk space | 311 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 50 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 208x |
Difference with world average | -167L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 EcoBoost | 311 L | 30 L to 1 s | 7.4x | 312x | -167L |
1.5 TDCi | 311 L | 35 L to 1 s | 7.8x | 207x | -167L |
Vehicle | 1.0 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Trunk space | 311 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 30 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 312x |
Difference with world average | -167L |
Vehicle | 1.5 TDCi |
Trunk space | 311 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 35 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 207x |
Difference with world average | -167L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 | 455 L | 45 L to 1 s | 10.1x | 285x | -23L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 455 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 45 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 285x |
Difference with world average | -23L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ST 1.6 EcoBoost | 281 L | 43 L to 1 s | 6.7x | 176x | -197L |
Vehicle | ST 1.6 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Trunk space | 281 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 43 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 176x |
Difference with world average | -197L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.25 | 295 L | 23 L to 1 s | 6.6x | 238x | -183L |
1.4 | 295 L | 22 L to 1 s | 6.6x | 213x | -183L |
1.6 TDCi | 295 L | - | 6.6x | 189x | -183L |
1.6 Ti-VCT | 295 L | 31 L to 1 s | 6.6x | 185x | -183L |
1.4 Duratec | 281 L | 24 L to 1 s | 6.7x | 202x | -197L |
Vehicle | 1.25 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 295 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 23 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 238x |
Difference with world average | -183L |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
Trunk space | 295 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 22 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 213x |
Difference with world average | -183L |
Vehicle | 1.6 TDCi |
Trunk space | 295 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 189x |
Difference with world average | -183L |
Vehicle | 1.6 Ti-VCT |
Trunk space | 295 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 31 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 185x |
Difference with world average | -183L |
Vehicle | 1.4 Duratec |
Trunk space | 281 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 24 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 202x |
Difference with world average | -197L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ST 2.0 Duratec HE | 268 L | 34 L to 1 s | 6x | 134x | -210L |
1.6 Duratorq TDCi | 284 L | 25 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 182x | -194L |
Vehicle | ST 2.0 Duratec HE |
---|---|
Trunk space | 268 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 34 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 134x |
Difference with world average | -210L |
Vehicle | 1.6 Duratorq TDCi |
Trunk space | 284 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 25 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 182x |
Difference with world average | -194L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4 Duratec | 284 L | 23 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 205x | -194L |
1.4 TDCi | 284 L | 20 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 203x | -194L |
1.25 Duratec | 284 L | 21 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 229x | -194L |
1.3 Duratec | 284 L | 16 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 219x | -194L |
1.6 Duratec | 284 L | 28 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 178x | -194L |
Vehicle | 1.4 Duratec |
---|---|
Trunk space | 284 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 23 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 205x |
Difference with world average | -194L |
Vehicle | 1.4 TDCi |
Trunk space | 284 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 20 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 203x |
Difference with world average | -194L |
Vehicle | 1.25 Duratec |
Trunk space | 284 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 21 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 229x |
Difference with world average | -194L |
Vehicle | 1.3 Duratec |
Trunk space | 284 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 16 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 219x |
Difference with world average | -194L |
Vehicle | 1.6 Duratec |
Trunk space | 284 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 28 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 178x |
Difference with world average | -194L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.3 i | 250 L | 17 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 192x | -228L |
1.25i 16V | 250 L | 21 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 201x | -228L |
1.8 D | 250 L | 15 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 143x | -228L |
1.6 16V Sport | 250 L | 26 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 157x | -228L |
1.8 DI | 250 L | 18 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 143x | -228L |
Vehicle | 1.3 i |
---|---|
Trunk space | 250 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 17 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 192x |
Difference with world average | -228L |
Vehicle | 1.25i 16V |
Trunk space | 250 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 21 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 201x |
Difference with world average | -228L |
Vehicle | 1.8 D |
Trunk space | 250 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 15 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 143x |
Difference with world average | -228L |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V Sport |
Trunk space | 250 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 26 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 157x |
Difference with world average | -228L |
Vehicle | 1.8 DI |
Trunk space | 250 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 18 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 143x |
Difference with world average | -228L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.3 i | 250 L | 17 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 192x | -228L |
1.25i 16V | 250 L | 21 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 201x | -228L |
1.8 DI | 250 L | 18 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 143x | -228L |
1.8 D | 250 L | 15 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 143x | -228L |
Vehicle | 1.3 i |
---|---|
Trunk space | 250 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 17 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 192x |
Difference with world average | -228L |
Vehicle | 1.25i 16V |
Trunk space | 250 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 21 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 201x |
Difference with world average | -228L |
Vehicle | 1.8 DI |
Trunk space | 250 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 18 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 143x |
Difference with world average | -228L |
Vehicle | 1.8 D |
Trunk space | 250 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 15 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 143x |
Difference with world average | -228L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.3 i | 250 L | 14 L to 1 s | 6x | 192x | -228L |
1.25i 16V | 250 L | 21 L to 1 s | 6x | 201x | -228L |
1.8 D | 250 L | 15 L to 1 s | 6x | 143x | -228L |
Vehicle | 1.3 i |
---|---|
Trunk space | 250 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 14 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 192x |
Difference with world average | -228L |
Vehicle | 1.25i 16V |
Trunk space | 250 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 21 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 201x |
Difference with world average | -228L |
Vehicle | 1.8 D |
Trunk space | 250 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 15 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 143x |
Difference with world average | -228L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.25i 16V | 250 L | 21 L to 1 s | 6x | 201x | -228L |
1.8 D | 250 L | 15 L to 1 s | 6x | 143x | -228L |
1.3 i | 250 L | 17 L to 1 s | 6x | 192x | -228L |
1.4 i 16V | 250 L | 24 L to 1 s | 6x | 180x | -228L |
Vehicle | 1.25i 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 250 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 21 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 201x |
Difference with world average | -228L |
Vehicle | 1.8 D |
Trunk space | 250 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 15 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 143x |
Difference with world average | -228L |
Vehicle | 1.3 i |
Trunk space | 250 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 17 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 192x |
Difference with world average | -228L |
Vehicle | 1.4 i 16V |
Trunk space | 250 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 24 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 180x |
Difference with world average | -228L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.1 | 250 L | 14 L to 1 s | 6x | 224x | -228L |
1.3 | 250 L | 17 L to 1 s | 6x | 192x | -228L |
1.4 | 250 L | 20 L to 1 s | 6x | 180x | -228L |
1.6 i | 250 L | 27 L to 1 s | 6x | 156x | -228L |
1.6 i 16V | 250 L | 24 L to 1 s | 6x | 157x | -228L |
1.6 i Turbo | 250 L | 32 L to 1 s | 6x | 156x | -228L |
1.8 16V | 250 L | 28 L to 1 s | 6x | 139x | -228L |
1.8 D | 250 L | 16 L to 1 s | 6x | 143x | -228L |
1.8 XR2i 16V | 250 L | 31 L to 1 s | 6x | 139x | -228L |
Vehicle | 1.1 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 250 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 14 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 224x |
Difference with world average | -228L |
Vehicle | 1.3 |
Trunk space | 250 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 17 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 192x |
Difference with world average | -228L |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
Trunk space | 250 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 20 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 180x |
Difference with world average | -228L |
Vehicle | 1.6 i |
Trunk space | 250 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 27 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 156x |
Difference with world average | -228L |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Trunk space | 250 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 24 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 157x |
Difference with world average | -228L |
Vehicle | 1.6 i Turbo |
Trunk space | 250 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 32 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 156x |
Difference with world average | -228L |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
Trunk space | 250 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 28 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 139x |
Difference with world average | -228L |
Vehicle | 1.8 D |
Trunk space | 250 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 16 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 143x |
Difference with world average | -228L |
Vehicle | 1.8 XR2i 16V |
Trunk space | 250 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 31 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 139x |
Difference with world average | -228L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 XR2 | 215 L | 24 L to 1 s | 5.4x | 135x | -263L |
Vehicle | 1.6 XR2 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 215 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 24 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 135x |
Difference with world average | -263L |