Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 EcoBoost | 435 L | 47 L to 1 s | 8.1x | 291x | -43L |
2.0 EcoBlue | 435 L | 52 L to 1 s | 8.1x | 218x | -43L |
1.5 EcoBlue | 435 L | 39 L to 1 s | 8.1x | 290x | -43L |
2.5 Duratec | 411 L | 47 L to 1 s | 9.6x | 165x | -67L |
Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Trunk space | 435 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 47 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 291x |
Difference with world average | -43L |
Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBlue |
Trunk space | 435 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 52 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 218x |
Difference with world average | -43L |
Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBlue |
Trunk space | 435 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 39 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 290x |
Difference with world average | -43L |
Vehicle | 2.5 Duratec |
Trunk space | 411 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 47 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 165x |
Difference with world average | -67L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 EcoBoost | 456 L | 50 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 304x | -22L |
2.0 TDCI | 456 L | 48 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 228x | -22L |
1.5 TDCI | 456 L | 39 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 304x | -22L |
2.0 EcoBoost | 456 L | 54 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 228x | -22L |
Vehicle | 1.5 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Trunk space | 456 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 50 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 304x |
Difference with world average | -22L |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDCI |
Trunk space | 456 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 48 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 228x |
Difference with world average | -22L |
Vehicle | 1.5 TDCI |
Trunk space | 456 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 39 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 304x |
Difference with world average | -22L |
Vehicle | 2.0 EcoBoost |
Trunk space | 456 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 54 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 228x |
Difference with world average | -22L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 EcoBoost | 425 L | 46 L to 1 s | 7.1x | 266x | -53L |
2.0 TDCi | 425 L | 43 L to 1 s | 7.1x | 213x | -53L |
Vehicle | 1.6 EcoBoost |
---|---|
Trunk space | 425 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 46 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 266x |
Difference with world average | -53L |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDCi |
Trunk space | 425 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 43 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 213x |
Difference with world average | -53L |