cat_logo
HomeFord

S-max

Ford S-MAX Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Choose Generation

Quick notes on Ford S-MAX trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 965 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 21.4 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 9.7 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 193 L
    • Max trunk load: 108 kg
    • Interior transformation: flexible
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 4.9 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 2.5 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 10 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.0 EcoBlue : 5.1 L/hp (6.9 L/kW)
  • 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue : 4 L/hp (5.5 L/kW)
  • 1.5 EcoBoost : 5.8 L/hp (8 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.0 EcoBlue : 4.64 L/km-h (2.88 L/mph)
  • 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue : 4.39 L/km-h (2.73 L/mph)
  • 1.5 EcoBoost : 4.75 L/km-h (2.95 L/mph)

    Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.0 EcoBlue 965 L 105 L to 1 s 15.3x - +487L
    2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue 965 L 118 L to 1 s 15.3x - +487L
    1.5 EcoBoost 965 L 99 L to 1 s 14.8x - +487L
    Vehicle 2.0 EcoBlue
    Trunk space 965 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 105 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 15.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity -
    Difference with world average +487L
    Vehicle 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
    Trunk space 965 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 118 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 15.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity -
    Difference with world average +487L
    Vehicle 1.5 EcoBoost
    Trunk space 965 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 99 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 14.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity -
    Difference with world average +487L

    Quick notes on Ford S-MAX trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 285 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 6.3 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 2.9 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 40.7 L
      • Max trunk load: 103 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 1.6 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 0.8 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 4 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.5 EcoBoost : 1.8 L/hp (2.4 L/kW)
  • 2.0 EcoBoost : 1.2 L/hp (1.6 L/kW)
  • 2.0 TDCi : 2.4 L/hp (3.2 L/kW)
  • 2.0 EcoBlue : 2.4 L/hp (3.2 L/kW)
  • 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue : 1.2 L/hp (1.6 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.5 EcoBoost : 1.43 L/km-h (0.89 L/mph)
  • 2.0 EcoBoost : 1.26 L/km-h (0.78 L/mph)
  • 2.0 TDCi : 1.56 L/km-h (0.97 L/mph)
  • 2.0 EcoBlue : 1.58 L/km-h (0.98 L/mph)
  • 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue : 1.31 L/km-h (0.81 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.5 EcoBoost : 43.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 EcoBoost : 32x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 TDCi : 57x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 EcoBlue : 55.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue : 48.3x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.5 EcoBoost 285 L 30 L to 1 s 4.1x 190x -193L
    2.0 EcoBoost 285 L 36 L to 1 s 4.1x 143x -193L
    2.0 TDCi 285 L 22 L to 1 s 4.1x 143x -193L
    2.0 EcoBlue 285 L 24 L to 1 s 4.1x 143x -193L
    2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue 285 L 35 L to 1 s 4.1x 143x -193L
    Vehicle 1.5 EcoBoost
    Trunk space 285 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 30 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 190x
    Difference with world average -193L
    Vehicle 2.0 EcoBoost
    Trunk space 285 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 36 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 143x
    Difference with world average -193L
    Vehicle 2.0 TDCi
    Trunk space 285 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 22 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 143x
    Difference with world average -193L
    Vehicle 2.0 EcoBlue
    Trunk space 285 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 24 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 143x
    Difference with world average -193L
    Vehicle 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
    Trunk space 285 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 35 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 143x
    Difference with world average -193L

    Quick notes on Ford S-MAX trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 285 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 6.3 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 2.9 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 40.7 L
      • Max trunk load: 100 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 1.7 L to 1 hp
      • Trunkley rating: 4 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.0 Duratec Durashift : 2 L/hp (2.7 L/kW)
  • 2.0 EcoBoost : 1.2 L/hp (1.6 L/kW)
  • 1.6 Duratorq TDCi : 2.5 L/hp (3.4 L/kW)
  • 1.6 EcoBoost SCTi : 1.8 L/hp (2.4 L/kW)
  • 2.0 Duratorq TDCi : 1.7 L/hp (2.4 L/kW)
  • 2.2 Duratorq TDCi : 1.4 L/hp (1.9 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.0 Duratec Durashift : 1.45 L/km-h (0.9 L/mph)
  • 2.0 EcoBoost : 1.21 L/km-h (0.75 L/mph)
  • 1.6 Duratorq TDCi : 1.58 L/km-h (0.98 L/mph)
  • 1.6 EcoBoost SCTi : 1.4 L/km-h (0.87 L/mph)
  • 2.0 Duratorq TDCi : 1.41 L/km-h (0.88 L/mph)
  • 2.2 Duratorq TDCi : 1.34 L/km-h (0.83 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.0 Duratec Durashift : 34.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 EcoBoost : 34.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 Duratorq TDCi : 54.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 EcoBoost SCTi : 40.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 Duratorq TDCi : 47.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.2 Duratorq TDCi : 40.1x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.0 Duratec Durashift 285 L 27 L to 1 s 4.1x - -193L
    2.0 EcoBoost 285 L 38 L to 1 s 4.1x - -193L
    1.6 Duratorq TDCi 285 L 23 L to 1 s 4.1x - -193L
    1.6 EcoBoost SCTi 285 L 31 L to 1 s 4.1x - -193L
    2.0 Duratorq TDCi 285 L 29 L to 1 s 4.1x - -193L
    2.2 Duratorq TDCi 285 L 34 L to 1 s 4.1x - -193L
    Vehicle 2.0 Duratec Durashift
    Trunk space 285 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 27 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity -
    Difference with world average -193L
    Vehicle 2.0 EcoBoost
    Trunk space 285 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 38 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity -
    Difference with world average -193L
    Vehicle 1.6 Duratorq TDCi
    Trunk space 285 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 23 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity -
    Difference with world average -193L
    Vehicle 1.6 EcoBoost SCTi
    Trunk space 285 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 31 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity -
    Difference with world average -193L
    Vehicle 2.0 Duratorq TDCi
    Trunk space 285 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 29 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity -
    Difference with world average -193L
    Vehicle 2.2 Duratorq TDCi
    Trunk space 285 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 34 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity -
    Difference with world average -193L

    Quick notes on Ford S-MAX trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 854 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 19 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 8.5 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 122 L
      • Max trunk load: 100 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 5.4 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 3 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 10 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.8 TDCi : 8.5 L/hp (11.5 L/kW)
  • 2.0 i 16V : 5.9 L/hp (8 L/kW)
  • 2.0 TDCi : 6.1 L/hp (8.3 L/kW)
  • 2.2 TDCi : 4.9 L/hp (6.6 L/kW)
  • 2.3 T : 5.3 L/hp (7.2 L/kW)
  • 2.5 i 20V : 3.9 L/hp (5.3 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.0 i 16V : 4.34 L/km-h (2.7 L/mph)
  • 2.0 TDCi : 4.36 L/km-h (2.71 L/mph)
  • 2.2 TDCi : 4.03 L/km-h (2.5 L/mph)
  • 2.3 T : 4.23 L/km-h (2.63 L/mph)
  • 2.5 i 20V : 3.71 L/km-h (2.31 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.0 i 16V : 105.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 TDCi : 133.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.2 TDCi : 129.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.3 T : 89.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.5 i 20V : 90.9x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.8 TDCi 854 L - 12.2x 487x +376L
    2.0 i 16V 854 L 82 L to 1 s 12.2x 427x +376L
    2.0 TDCi 854 L 88 L to 1 s 12.2x 428x +376L
    2.2 TDCi 854 L 96 L to 1 s 12.2x 392x +376L
    2.3 T 854 L 81 L to 1 s 12.2x 378x +376L
    2.5 i 20V 854 L 114 L to 1 s 12.2x 339x +376L
    Vehicle 1.8 TDCi
    Trunk space 854 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 12.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 487x
    Difference with world average +376L
    Vehicle 2.0 i 16V
    Trunk space 854 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 82 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 12.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 427x
    Difference with world average +376L
    Vehicle 2.0 TDCi
    Trunk space 854 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 88 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 12.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 428x
    Difference with world average +376L
    Vehicle 2.2 TDCi
    Trunk space 854 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 96 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 12.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 392x
    Difference with world average +376L
    Vehicle 2.3 T
    Trunk space 854 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 81 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 12.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 378x
    Difference with world average +376L
    Vehicle 2.5 i 20V
    Trunk space 854 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 114 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 12.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 339x
    Difference with world average +376L