Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.3 V6 | 2160 L | - | 16.9x | 502x | +1682L |
5.3 V6 | 2160 L | - | 16.9x | 405x | +1682L |
Vehicle | 4.3 V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 2160 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 16.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 502x |
Difference with world average | +1682L |
Vehicle | 5.3 V6 |
Trunk space | 2160 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 16.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 405x |
Difference with world average | +1682L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.3 V6 | 1727 L | - | 17.6x | 402x | +1249L |
5.3 V6 | 1727 L | - | 17.6x | 324x | +1249L |
Vehicle | 4.3 V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 1727 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 17.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 402x |
Difference with world average | +1249L |
Vehicle | 5.3 V6 |
Trunk space | 1727 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 17.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 324x |
Difference with world average | +1249L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.3 V6 | 1727 L | - | 17.6x | 402x | +1249L |
6.2 V8 | 1727 L | - | 17.6x | 280x | +1249L |
5.3 V8 | 1727 L | - | 17.6x | 324x | +1249L |
Vehicle | 4.3 V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 1727 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 17.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 402x |
Difference with world average | +1249L |
Vehicle | 6.2 V8 |
Trunk space | 1727 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 17.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 280x |
Difference with world average | +1249L |
Vehicle | 5.3 V8 |
Trunk space | 1727 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 17.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 324x |
Difference with world average | +1249L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.3 V6 | 1512 L | - | 15.4x | 352x | +1034L |
5.3 V8 | 1512 L | - | 15.4x | 284x | +1034L |
6.2 V8 | 1512 L | - | 15.4x | 245x | +1034L |
Vehicle | 4.3 V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 1512 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 15.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 352x |
Difference with world average | +1034L |
Vehicle | 5.3 V8 |
Trunk space | 1512 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 15.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 284x |
Difference with world average | +1034L |
Vehicle | 6.2 V8 |
Trunk space | 1512 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 15.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 245x |
Difference with world average | +1034L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.3 V8 | 1727 L | - | 17.6x | 324x | +1249L |
6.2 V8 | 1727 L | - | 17.6x | 280x | +1249L |
Vehicle | 5.3 V8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 1727 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 17.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 324x |
Difference with world average | +1249L |
Vehicle | 6.2 V8 |
Trunk space | 1727 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 17.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 280x |
Difference with world average | +1249L |