2018 Accord X
2016 Accord IX (facelift 2016)
2016 Accord IX Coupe (facelift 2016)
2012 Accord IX Coupe
2012 Accord IX
2011 Accord VIII (facelift 2011) Wagon
2008 Accord VIII
2011 Accord VIII (facelift 2011)
2008 Accord VIII Wagon
2002 Accord VII Wagon
2002 Accord VII
2002 Accord VII Coupe
1998 Accord VI Coupe
1998 Accord VI Hatchback
1998 Accord VI (CE,CF)
1996 Accord V (CC7, facelift 1996)
1993 Accord V Wagon (CE)
1993 Accord V (CC7)
1993 Accord V Coupe (CD7)
1990 Accord IV Coupe (CC1)
1990 Accord IV (CB3,CB7)
1990 Accord IV Wagon (CB8)
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sport 1.5 Turbo | 473 L | - | 8.4x | 316x | -5L |
2.0 Turbo | 473 L | - | 8.4x | 237x | -5L |
2.0 | 473 L | - | 9.9x | 237x | -5L |
Vehicle | Sport 1.5 Turbo |
---|---|
Trunk space | 473 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 316x |
Difference with world average | -5L |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo |
Trunk space | 473 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 237x |
Difference with world average | -5L |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Trunk space | 473 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 237x |
Difference with world average | -5L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 V6 | 447 L | - | 6.9x | 129x | -31L |
2.0 | 382 L | - | 6.4x | 192x | -96L |
2.4 | 447 L | - | 6.9x | 190x | -31L |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 447 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 129x |
Difference with world average | -31L |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Trunk space | 382 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 192x |
Difference with world average | -96L |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Trunk space | 447 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 190x |
Difference with world average | -31L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 V6 | 379 L | - | 5.8x | 109x | -99L |
2.4 | 379 L | - | 5.8x | 161x | -99L |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 379 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 109x |
Difference with world average | -99L |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Trunk space | 379 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 161x |
Difference with world average | -99L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 V6 | 379 L | - | 5.8x | 109x | -99L |
2.4 | 379 L | - | 5.8x | 161x | -99L |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 379 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 109x |
Difference with world average | -99L |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Trunk space | 379 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 161x |
Difference with world average | -99L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 | 244 L | - | 5.3x | 122x | -234L |
3.5 V6 | 439 L | - | 6.8x | 126x | -39L |
2.4 | 447 L | - | 6.9x | 190x | -31L |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 244 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 122x |
Difference with world average | -234L |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
Trunk space | 439 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 126x |
Difference with world average | -39L |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Trunk space | 447 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 190x |
Difference with world average | -31L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i-VTEC | 406 L | 39 L to 1 s | 6.2x | 203x | -72L |
2.4 i-VTEC | 406 L | 43 L to 1 s | 6.2x | 172x | -72L |
2.2 i-DTEC | 406 L | 41 L to 1 s | 6.2x | 185x | -72L |
Vehicle | 2.0 i-VTEC |
---|---|
Trunk space | 406 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 39 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 203x |
Difference with world average | -72L |
Vehicle | 2.4 i-VTEC |
Trunk space | 406 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 43 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 172x |
Difference with world average | -72L |
Vehicle | 2.2 i-DTEC |
Trunk space | 406 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 41 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 185x |
Difference with world average | -72L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i-VTEC 16V | 467 L | 45 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 234x | -11L |
2.4i Automatic | 464 L | 50 L to 1 s | 7.1x | 197x | -14L |
2.4i MT | 464 L | - | 7.1x | 197x | -14L |
2.2 i-DTEC | 467 L | 51 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 212x | -11L |
2.2 i-DTEC Type S | 464 L | 56 L to 1 s | 7.1x | 211x | -14L |
Vehicle | 2.0 i-VTEC 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 467 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 45 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 234x |
Difference with world average | -11L |
Vehicle | 2.4i Automatic |
Trunk space | 464 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 50 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 197x |
Difference with world average | -14L |
Vehicle | 2.4i MT |
Trunk space | 464 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 197x |
Difference with world average | -14L |
Vehicle | 2.2 i-DTEC |
Trunk space | 467 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 51 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 212x |
Difference with world average | -11L |
Vehicle | 2.2 i-DTEC Type S |
Trunk space | 464 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 56 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 211x |
Difference with world average | -14L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i-VTEC | 467 L | 45 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 234x | -11L |
2.2 i-DTEC | 467 L | 49 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 212x | -11L |
2.4 i-VTEC | 464 L | 51 L to 1 s | 7.1x | 197x | -14L |
Vehicle | 2.0 i-VTEC |
---|---|
Trunk space | 467 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 45 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 234x |
Difference with world average | -11L |
Vehicle | 2.2 i-DTEC |
Trunk space | 467 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 49 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 212x |
Difference with world average | -11L |
Vehicle | 2.4 i-VTEC |
Trunk space | 464 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 51 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 197x |
Difference with world average | -14L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 | 395 L | 38 L to 1 s | 6.1x | 198x | -83L |
2.2 i-Dtec | 395 L | 43 L to 1 s | 6.1x | 180x | -83L |
2.4 | 395 L | 43 L to 1 s | 6.1x | 168x | -83L |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 395 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 38 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 198x |
Difference with world average | -83L |
Vehicle | 2.2 i-Dtec |
Trunk space | 395 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 43 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 180x |
Difference with world average | -83L |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Trunk space | 395 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 43 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 168x |
Difference with world average | -83L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i-VTEC 16V | 572 L | 61 L to 1 s | 8.8x | 286x | +94L |
2.2 i-CTDi | 576 L | 60 L to 1 s | 8.9x | 261x | +98L |
2.4 i-VTEC 16V | 572 L | 61 L to 1 s | 8.8x | 243x | +94L |
Vehicle | 2.0 i-VTEC 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 572 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 61 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 286x |
Difference with world average | +94L |
Vehicle | 2.2 i-CTDi |
Trunk space | 576 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 60 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 261x |
Difference with world average | +98L |
Vehicle | 2.4 i-VTEC 16V |
Trunk space | 572 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 61 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 243x |
Difference with world average | +94L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i-VTEC 16V | 459 L | 46 L to 1 s | 7.1x | 230x | -19L |
2.4 i-VTEC 16V | 459 L | 61 L to 1 s | 7.1x | 195x | -19L |
2.0 i-VTEC 16V Sport | 459 L | 53 L to 1 s | 7.1x | 230x | -19L |
2.2 i-CTDi | 459 L | 52 L to 1 s | 7.1x | 208x | -19L |
2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S | 459 L | 61 L to 1 s | 7.1x | 195x | -19L |
Vehicle | 2.0 i-VTEC 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 459 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 46 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 230x |
Difference with world average | -19L |
Vehicle | 2.4 i-VTEC 16V |
Trunk space | 459 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 61 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 195x |
Difference with world average | -19L |
Vehicle | 2.0 i-VTEC 16V Sport |
Trunk space | 459 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 53 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 230x |
Difference with world average | -19L |
Vehicle | 2.2 i-CTDi |
Trunk space | 459 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 52 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 208x |
Difference with world average | -19L |
Vehicle | 2.4 i-VTEC 16V Type-S |
Trunk space | 459 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 61 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 195x |
Difference with world average | -19L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 i 16V | 363 L | 42 L to 1 s | 5.6x | 154x | -115L |
3.0i V6 24V | 363 L | 53 L to 1 s | 5.6x | 121x | -115L |
Vehicle | 2.4 i 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 363 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 42 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 154x |
Difference with world average | -115L |
Vehicle | 3.0i V6 24V |
Trunk space | 363 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 53 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 121x |
Difference with world average | -115L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 16V | 467 L | 49 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 234x | -11L |
3.0 V6 24V | 467 L | 58 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 156x | -11L |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 467 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 49 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 234x |
Difference with world average | -11L |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 24V |
Trunk space | 467 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 58 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 156x |
Difference with world average | -11L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 i 16V | 450 L | 39 L to 1 s | 6.9x | 283x | -28L |
1.8i | 430 L | 41 L to 1 s | 6.6x | 232x | -48L |
2.0i 16V | 450 L | 43 L to 1 s | 6.9x | 225x | -28L |
2.0 TD | 450 L | 35 L to 1 s | 6.9x | 226x | -28L |
2.3i 16V | 450 L | 47 L to 1 s | 6.9x | 200x | -28L |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 39 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 283x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
Trunk space | 430 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 41 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 232x |
Difference with world average | -48L |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 43 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 225x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD |
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 35 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 226x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | 2.3i 16V |
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 47 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 200x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 16V | 430 L | 37 L to 1 s | 6.6x | 270x | -48L |
2.0 16V | 430 L | 41 L to 1 s | 6.6x | 215x | -48L |
1.8 16V | 430 L | 39 L to 1 s | 6.6x | 232x | -48L |
2.0 Turbo Di | 430 L | 35 L to 1 s | 6.6x | 216x | -48L |
2.2 Type-R | 430 L | 63 L to 1 s | 6.6x | 199x | -48L |
2.3 16V | 430 L | 45 L to 1 s | 6.6x | 191x | -48L |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 430 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 37 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 270x |
Difference with world average | -48L |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Trunk space | 430 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 41 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 215x |
Difference with world average | -48L |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
Trunk space | 430 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 39 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 232x |
Difference with world average | -48L |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo Di |
Trunk space | 430 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 35 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 216x |
Difference with world average | -48L |
Vehicle | 2.2 Type-R |
Trunk space | 430 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 63 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 199x |
Difference with world average | -48L |
Vehicle | 2.3 16V |
Trunk space | 430 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 45 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 191x |
Difference with world average | -48L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8i 16V | 405 L | - | 6.2x | 219x | -73L |
2.0 TDi | 405 L | 37 L to 1 s | 6.2x | 203x | -73L |
2.2i VTEC | 405 L | 47 L to 1 s | 6.2x | 188x | -73L |
Vehicle | 1.8i 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 405 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 219x |
Difference with world average | -73L |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDi |
Trunk space | 405 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 37 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 203x |
Difference with world average | -73L |
Vehicle | 2.2i VTEC |
Trunk space | 405 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 47 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 188x |
Difference with world average | -73L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2i ES | 430 L | 49 L to 1 s | 6.6x | 200x | -48L |
2.0i LS 16V | 430 L | 44 L to 1 s | 6.6x | 215x | -48L |
Vehicle | 2.2i ES |
---|---|
Trunk space | 430 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 49 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 200x |
Difference with world average | -48L |
Vehicle | 2.0i LS 16V |
Trunk space | 430 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 44 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 215x |
Difference with world average | -48L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i | 405 L | 39 L to 1 s | 6.2x | 203x | -73L |
2.0i S | 405 L | 42 L to 1 s | 6.2x | 203x | -73L |
2.3 i SR | 405 L | 51 L to 1 s | 6.2x | 179x | -73L |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
---|---|
Trunk space | 405 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 39 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 203x |
Difference with world average | -73L |
Vehicle | 2.0i S |
Trunk space | 405 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 42 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 203x |
Difference with world average | -73L |
Vehicle | 2.3 i SR |
Trunk space | 405 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 51 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 179x |
Difference with world average | -73L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2i ES | 436 L | 52 L to 1 s | 6.7x | 202x | -42L |
Vehicle | 2.2i ES |
---|---|
Trunk space | 436 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 52 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 202x |
Difference with world average | -42L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 i 16V | 488 L | 61 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 226x | +10L |
2.0 i 16V | 488 L | - | 7.6x | 244x | +10L |
Vehicle | 2.2 i 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 488 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 61 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 226x |
Difference with world average | +10L |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Trunk space | 488 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 244x |
Difference with world average | +10L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 | 448 L | - | 7.5x | 242x | -30L |
2.0 16V | 448 L | 43 L to 1 s | 7.5x | 224x | -30L |
2.0 i 16V | 448 L | - | 7.5x | 224x | -30L |
2.2 i 16V | 448 L | 56 L to 1 s | 7.5x | 208x | -30L |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 448 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 242x |
Difference with world average | -30L |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Trunk space | 448 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 43 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 224x |
Difference with world average | -30L |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Trunk space | 448 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 224x |
Difference with world average | -30L |
Vehicle | 2.2 i 16V |
Trunk space | 448 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 56 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 208x |
Difference with world average | -30L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 i 16V | 980 L | 123 L to 1 s | 16.3x | 455x | +502L |
Vehicle | 2.2 i 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 980 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 123 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 16.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 455x |
Difference with world average | +502L |