Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 i 24V | 450 L | 52 L to 1 s | 6.6x | 130x | -28L |
Vehicle | 3.5 i 24V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 52 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 130x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.2i 24V | 427 L | 55 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 133x | -51L |
Vehicle | 3.2i 24V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 427 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 55 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 133x |
Difference with world average | -51L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.2i 24V | 417 L | 60 L to 1 s | 6.1x | 130x | -61L |
Vehicle | 3.2i 24V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 417 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 60 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 130x |
Difference with world average | -61L |