Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 V6 | 467 L | - | 6.3x | 135x | -11L |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 467 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 135x |
Difference with world average | -11L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 V6 | 453 L | - | 6.1x | 131x | -25L |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 453 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 131x |
Difference with world average | -25L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 V6 | 509 L | - | 6.4x | 147x | +31L |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 509 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 147x |
Difference with world average | +31L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 V6 | 461 L | - | 6x | 133x | -17L |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 461 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 133x |
Difference with world average | -17L |