Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R8 LSA 6.2 V8 | 496 L | - | 7x | 80x | +18L |
Vehicle | R8 LSA 6.2 V8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 496 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 80x |
Difference with world average | +18L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R8 LSA 6.2 V8 | 895 L | - | 12.6x | 145x | +417L |
Vehicle | R8 LSA 6.2 V8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 895 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 12.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 145x |
Difference with world average | +417L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R8 SV 6.2 V8 | 496 L | 108 L to 1 s | 7x | 80x | +18L |
R8 6.2 V8 | 496 L | 103 L to 1 s | 7x | 80x | +18L |
6.2 V8 | 496 L | 103 L to 1 s | 7x | 80x | +18L |
Vehicle | R8 SV 6.2 V8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 496 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 108 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 80x |
Difference with world average | +18L |
Vehicle | R8 6.2 V8 |
Trunk space | 496 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 103 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 80x |
Difference with world average | +18L |
Vehicle | 6.2 V8 |
Trunk space | 496 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 103 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 80x |
Difference with world average | +18L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R8 6.2 V8 | 496 L | 106 L to 1 s | 7x | 80x | +18L |
Vehicle | R8 6.2 V8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 496 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 106 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 80x |
Difference with world average | +18L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R8 6.0 V8 | 496 L | 108 L to 1 s | 6.8x | 83x | +18L |
Vehicle | R8 6.0 V8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 496 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 108 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 83x |
Difference with world average | +18L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R8 6.0 V8 | 465 L | 93 L to 1 s | 6.2x | 78x | -13L |
Vehicle | R8 6.0 V8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 465 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 93 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 78x |
Difference with world average | -13L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R8 5.7 V8 | 475 L | 88 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 84x | -3L |
Vehicle | R8 5.7 V8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 475 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 88 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 84x |
Difference with world average | -3L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R8 5.7 V8 | 475 L | 91 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 84x | -3L |
Vehicle | R8 5.7 V8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 475 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 91 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 84x |
Difference with world average | -3L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R8 5.7 V8 | 475 L | 93 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 84x | -3L |
Vehicle | R8 5.7 V8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 475 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 93 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 84x |
Difference with world average | -3L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R8 5.7 V8 | 475 L | 91 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 84x | -3L |
Vehicle | R8 5.7 V8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 475 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 91 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 84x |
Difference with world average | -3L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.0 V8 | 475 L | 70 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 95x | -3L |
Vehicle | 5.0 V8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 475 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 70 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 95x |
Difference with world average | -3L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
185i V8 | 555 L | 87 L to 1 s | 6.9x | 111x | +77L |
Vehicle | 185i V8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 555 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 87 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 111x |
Difference with world average | +77L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.0 V8 | 555 L | 83 L to 1 s | 8.8x | 111x | +77L |
Vehicle | 5.0 V8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 555 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 83 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 111x |
Difference with world average | +77L |