Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.0 Sport | 663 L | 52 L to 1 s | 8.8x | 223x | +185L |
3.0 | 1386 L | - | 15.1x | 466x | +908L |
2.5 TD | 1386 L | 86 L to 1 s | 15.1x | 560x | +908L |
2.5 TD Sport | 165 L | 9 L to 1 s | 2.2x | 67x | -313L |
3.0 i V6 Sport | 663 L | - | 8.8x | 223x | +185L |
3.0 i V6 | 1080 L | - | 14.4x | 363x | +602L |
Vehicle | 3.0 Sport |
---|---|
Trunk space | 663 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 52 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 223x |
Difference with world average | +185L |
Vehicle | 3.0 |
Trunk space | 1386 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 15.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 466x |
Difference with world average | +908L |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
Trunk space | 1386 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 86 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 15.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 560x |
Difference with world average | +908L |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD Sport |
Trunk space | 165 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 9 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 2.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 67x |
Difference with world average | -313L |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 Sport |
Trunk space | 663 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 223x |
Difference with world average | +185L |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 |
Trunk space | 1080 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 14.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 363x |
Difference with world average | +602L |