Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 MPi | 351 L | 28 L to 1 s | - | 293x | -127L |
1.0 T-GDi | 351 L | 33 L to 1 s | - | 352x | -127L |
1.0 T-GDi 48V | 351 L | 36 L to 1 s | - | 352x | -127L |
Vehicle | 1.2 MPi |
---|---|
Trunk space | 351 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 28 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | - |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 293x |
Difference with world average | -127L |
Vehicle | 1.0 T-GDi |
Trunk space | 351 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 33 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | - |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 352x |
Difference with world average | -127L |
Vehicle | 1.0 T-GDi 48V |
Trunk space | 351 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 36 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | - |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 352x |
Difference with world average | -127L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4 | 326 L | 30 L to 1 s | 6.5x | 238x | -152L |
1.0 T-GDi | 301 L | 30 L to 1 s | 6x | 302x | -177L |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 326 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 30 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 238x |
Difference with world average | -152L |
Vehicle | 1.0 T-GDi |
Trunk space | 301 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 30 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 302x |
Difference with world average | -177L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 T-GDI | 326 L | 33 L to 1 s | 6.5x | 327x | -152L |
1.2 | 326 L | 25 L to 1 s | 6.5x | 261x | -152L |
Vehicle | 1.0 T-GDI |
---|---|
Trunk space | 326 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 33 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 327x |
Difference with world average | -152L |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
Trunk space | 326 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 25 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 261x |
Difference with world average | -152L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 | 326 L | 26 L to 1 s | 6.5x | 261x | -152L |
1.4 CRDi | 326 L | 28 L to 1 s | 6.5x | 234x | -152L |
1.4 | 326 L | 30 L to 1 s | 6.5x | 238x | -152L |
1.1 CRDi | 326 L | 21 L to 1 s | 6.5x | 291x | -152L |
1.0 T-GDI | 326 L | 34 L to 1 s | 6.5x | 327x | -152L |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 326 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 26 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 261x |
Difference with world average | -152L |
Vehicle | 1.4 CRDi |
Trunk space | 326 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 28 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 234x |
Difference with world average | -152L |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
Trunk space | 326 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 30 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 238x |
Difference with world average | -152L |
Vehicle | 1.1 CRDi |
Trunk space | 326 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 21 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 291x |
Difference with world average | -152L |
Vehicle | 1.0 T-GDI |
Trunk space | 326 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 34 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 327x |
Difference with world average | -152L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4 | 336 L | 27 L to 1 s | 6.7x | 246x | -142L |
1.4 CRDi | 336 L | 29 L to 1 s | 6.7x | 241x | -142L |
1.2 | 336 L | 28 L to 1 s | 6.7x | 269x | -142L |
1.0 T-GDI | 336 L | 35 L to 1 s | 6.7x | 337x | -142L |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 336 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 27 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 246x |
Difference with world average | -142L |
Vehicle | 1.4 CRDi |
Trunk space | 336 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 29 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 241x |
Difference with world average | -142L |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
Trunk space | 336 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 28 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 269x |
Difference with world average | -142L |
Vehicle | 1.0 T-GDI |
Trunk space | 336 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 35 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 337x |
Difference with world average | -142L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 T-GDI | 326 L | 33 L to 1 s | 6.5x | 327x | -152L |
1.4 CRDi | 326 L | 28 L to 1 s | 6.5x | 234x | -152L |
1.4 | 326 L | 29 L to 1 s | 6.5x | 238x | -152L |
Vehicle | 1.0 T-GDI |
---|---|
Trunk space | 326 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 33 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 327x |
Difference with world average | -152L |
Vehicle | 1.4 CRDi |
Trunk space | 326 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 28 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 234x |
Difference with world average | -152L |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
Trunk space | 326 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 29 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 238x |
Difference with world average | -152L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 16V | 295 L | 24 L to 1 s | 6.6x | 236x | -183L |
1.4 16V | 295 L | 24 L to 1 s | 6.6x | 211x | -183L |
1.1 CRDi | 295 L | 20 L to 1 s | 6.6x | 263x | -183L |
1.4 CRDi | 295 L | 23 L to 1 s | 6.6x | 211x | -183L |
Vehicle | 1.2 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 295 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 24 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 236x |
Difference with world average | -183L |
Vehicle | 1.4 16V |
Trunk space | 295 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 24 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 211x |
Difference with world average | -183L |
Vehicle | 1.1 CRDi |
Trunk space | 295 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 20 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 263x |
Difference with world average | -183L |
Vehicle | 1.4 CRDi |
Trunk space | 295 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 23 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 211x |
Difference with world average | -183L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4 | 295 L | 27 L to 1 s | 6.6x | 211x | -183L |
1.6 CRDi | 295 L | 30 L to 1 s | 6.6x | 186x | -183L |
1.4 CRDi | 295 L | 23 L to 1 s | 6.6x | 211x | -183L |
1.6 | 295 L | 27 L to 1 s | 6.6x | 185x | -183L |
1.2 | 295 L | 24 L to 1 s | 6.6x | 236x | -183L |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 295 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 27 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 211x |
Difference with world average | -183L |
Vehicle | 1.6 CRDi |
Trunk space | 295 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 30 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 186x |
Difference with world average | -183L |
Vehicle | 1.4 CRDi |
Trunk space | 295 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 23 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 211x |
Difference with world average | -183L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Trunk space | 295 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 27 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 185x |
Difference with world average | -183L |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
Trunk space | 295 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 24 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 236x |
Difference with world average | -183L |