Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 | 402 L | 39 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 201x | -76L |
1.6 | 402 L | 34 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 253x | -76L |
1.6 CRDi | 402 L | - | 7.3x | 254x | -76L |
1.4 CRDi | 402 L | - | 7.3x | 288x | -76L |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 402 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 39 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 201x |
Difference with world average | -76L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Trunk space | 402 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 34 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 253x |
Difference with world average | -76L |
Vehicle | 1.6 CRDi |
Trunk space | 402 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 254x |
Difference with world average | -76L |
Vehicle | 1.4 CRDi |
Trunk space | 402 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 288x |
Difference with world average | -76L |