Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 GDI | 625 L | - | - | 265x | +147L |
R 2.2 CRDi | 625 L | - | - | 284x | +147L |
R 2.0 CRDi | 625 L | - | - | 313x | +147L |
Vehicle | 2.4 GDI |
---|---|
Trunk space | 625 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | - |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 265x |
Difference with world average | +147L |
Vehicle | R 2.2 CRDi |
Trunk space | 625 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | - |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 284x |
Difference with world average | +147L |
Vehicle | R 2.0 CRDi |
Trunk space | 625 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | - |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 313x |
Difference with world average | +147L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 CRDI | 634 L | 67 L to 1 s | 8.9x | 288x | +156L |
3.3 V6 | 634 L | - | 8.9x | 190x | +156L |
Vehicle | 2.2 CRDI |
---|---|
Trunk space | 634 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 67 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 288x |
Difference with world average | +156L |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
Trunk space | 634 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 190x |
Difference with world average | +156L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 CRDi | 516 L | 49 L to 1 s | 8.1x | 259x | +38L |
2.4 GDI | 516 L | 55 L to 1 s | 8.1x | 219x | +38L |
2.2 CRDi | 516 L | 57 L to 1 s | 8.1x | 235x | +38L |
3.3 MPi | 1680 L | 207 L to 1 s | - | 503x | +1202L |
Vehicle | 2.0 CRDi |
---|---|
Trunk space | 516 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 49 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 259x |
Difference with world average | +38L |
Vehicle | 2.4 GDI |
Trunk space | 516 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 55 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 219x |
Difference with world average | +38L |
Vehicle | 2.2 CRDi |
Trunk space | 516 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 57 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 235x |
Difference with world average | +38L |
Vehicle | 3.3 MPi |
Trunk space | 1680 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 207 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | - |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 503x |
Difference with world average | +1202L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 CRDi | 634 L | 65 L to 1 s | 8.9x | 288x | +156L |
Vehicle | 2.2 CRDi |
---|---|
Trunk space | 634 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 65 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 288x |
Difference with world average | +156L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 CRDi | 585 L | 61 L to 1 s | 9.1x | 266x | +107L |
2.4 GDI | 585 L | 59 L to 1 s | 9.1x | 248x | +107L |
2.0 CRDi | 585 L | 55 L to 1 s | 9.1x | 293x | +107L |
Vehicle | 2.2 CRDi |
---|---|
Trunk space | 585 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 61 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 266x |
Difference with world average | +107L |
Vehicle | 2.4 GDI |
Trunk space | 585 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 59 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 248x |
Difference with world average | +107L |
Vehicle | 2.0 CRDi |
Trunk space | 585 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 55 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 293x |
Difference with world average | +107L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 CRDi | 774 L | 63 L to 1 s | 10.3x | 354x | +296L |
2.7 i V6 24V 4WD | 774 L | 70 L to 1 s | 10.3x | 291x | +296L |
2.2 CRDi 4WD | 774 L | 70 L to 1 s | 10.3x | 354x | +296L |
2.7 i V6 24V | 774 L | 81 L to 1 s | 10.3x | 291x | +296L |
2.7 i V6 24V 4WD Automatic | 969 L | 87 L to 1 s | 12.9x | 365x | +491L |
Vehicle | 2.2 CRDi |
---|---|
Trunk space | 774 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 63 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 354x |
Difference with world average | +296L |
Vehicle | 2.7 i V6 24V 4WD |
Trunk space | 774 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 70 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 291x |
Difference with world average | +296L |
Vehicle | 2.2 CRDi 4WD |
Trunk space | 774 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 70 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 354x |
Difference with world average | +296L |
Vehicle | 2.7 i V6 24V |
Trunk space | 774 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 81 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 291x |
Difference with world average | +296L |
Vehicle | 2.7 i V6 24V 4WD Automatic |
Trunk space | 969 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 87 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 12.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 365x |
Difference with world average | +491L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 i 16V 4WD | 469 L | 43 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 199x | -9L |
2.4 i 16V | 469 L | 42 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 199x | -9L |
2.0 CRDi 4WD | 850 L | 60 L to 1 s | 13.1x | 427x | +372L |
2.0 CRDi | 850 L | 60 L to 1 s | 13.1x | 427x | +372L |
2.0 i 16V | 469 L | 40 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 235x | -9L |
2.7 i V6 24V | 469 L | 43 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 177x | -9L |
3.5 i V6 24V | 850 L | - | 13.1x | 243x | +372L |
Vehicle | 2.4 i 16V 4WD |
---|---|
Trunk space | 469 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 43 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 199x |
Difference with world average | -9L |
Vehicle | 2.4 i 16V |
Trunk space | 469 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 42 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 199x |
Difference with world average | -9L |
Vehicle | 2.0 CRDi 4WD |
Trunk space | 850 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 60 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 13.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 427x |
Difference with world average | +372L |
Vehicle | 2.0 CRDi |
Trunk space | 850 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 60 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 13.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 427x |
Difference with world average | +372L |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Trunk space | 469 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 40 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 235x |
Difference with world average | -9L |
Vehicle | 2.7 i V6 24V |
Trunk space | 469 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 43 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 177x |
Difference with world average | -9L |
Vehicle | 3.5 i V6 24V |
Trunk space | 850 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 13.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 243x |
Difference with world average | +372L |