Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.9 CRDi | 1170 L | 94 L to 1 s | 15.6x | 403x | +692L |
2.5 TD | 1170 L | 65 L to 1 s | 15.6x | 472x | +692L |
3.5 i V6 24V | 1170 L | 130 L to 1 s | 15.6x | 335x | +692L |
2.9 16V DSL | 1170 L | 90 L to 1 s | 15.6x | 403x | +692L |
Vehicle | 2.9 CRDi |
---|---|
Trunk space | 1170 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 94 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 15.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 403x |
Difference with world average | +692L |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
Trunk space | 1170 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 65 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 15.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 472x |
Difference with world average | +692L |
Vehicle | 3.5 i V6 24V |
Trunk space | 1170 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 130 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 15.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 335x |
Difference with world average | +692L |
Vehicle | 2.9 16V DSL |
Trunk space | 1170 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 90 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 15.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 403x |
Difference with world average | +692L |