Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.0i V8 32V AWD | 376 L | 68 L to 1 s | 4.2x | 75x | -102L |
Vehicle | 5.0i V8 32V AWD |
---|---|
Trunk space | 376 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 68 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 75x |
Difference with world average | -102L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 i V6 | 376 L | 57 L to 1 s | 4.2x | 107x | -102L |
Vehicle | 3.5 i V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 376 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 57 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 107x |
Difference with world average | -102L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.5 i V8 32V AWD | 776 L | 129 L to 1 s | 8.6x | 173x | +298L |
Vehicle | 4.5 i V8 32V AWD |
---|---|
Trunk space | 776 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 129 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 173x |
Difference with world average | +298L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 i V6 24V | 776 L | 116 L to 1 s | 8.6x | 222x | +298L |
3.5 i V6 24V AWD | 776 L | - | 8.6x | 222x | +298L |
Vehicle | 3.5 i V6 24V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 776 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 116 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 222x |
Difference with world average | +298L |
Vehicle | 3.5 i V6 24V AWD |
Trunk space | 776 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 222x |
Difference with world average | +298L |