Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 i V6 24V | 411 L | 75 L to 1 s | 5.4x | 117x | -67L |
Vehicle | 3.5 i V6 24V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 411 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 75 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 117x |
Difference with world average | -67L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 i V6 24V | 211 L | 38 L to 1 s | 2.8x | 60x | -267L |
Vehicle | 3.5 i V6 24V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 211 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 38 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 2.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 60x |
Difference with world average | -267L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 i V6 24V | 475 L | 81 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 136x | -3L |
Vehicle | 3.5 i V6 24V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 475 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 81 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 136x |
Difference with world average | -3L |