Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.2 i 24V 4WD | 630 L | - | 6.6x | 152x | +152L |
4.2 i 24V 2WD | 630 L | - | 6.6x | 152x | +152L |
5.3 i V8 16V 2WD | 630 L | - | 6.6x | 118x | +152L |
5.3 i V8 16V 4WD | 630 L | - | 6.6x | 118x | +152L |
5.3 i V8 2WD | 630 L | - | 6.6x | 118x | +152L |
5.3 i V8 4WD | 630 L | - | 6.6x | 118x | +152L |
Vehicle | 4.2 i 24V 4WD |
---|---|
Trunk space | 630 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 152x |
Difference with world average | +152L |
Vehicle | 4.2 i 24V 2WD |
Trunk space | 630 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 152x |
Difference with world average | +152L |
Vehicle | 5.3 i V8 16V 2WD |
Trunk space | 630 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 118x |
Difference with world average | +152L |
Vehicle | 5.3 i V8 16V 4WD |
Trunk space | 630 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 118x |
Difference with world average | +152L |
Vehicle | 5.3 i V8 2WD |
Trunk space | 630 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 118x |
Difference with world average | +152L |
Vehicle | 5.3 i V8 4WD |
Trunk space | 630 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 118x |
Difference with world average | +152L |