cat_logo
HomeJaguar

F-type

Jaguar F-type Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Choose Generation

Quick notes on Jaguar F-type trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 310 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 6.9 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 3.1 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 155 L
    • Max trunk load: 93 kg
    • Interior transformation: none
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 0.8 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 0.6 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 4 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • SVR 5.0 V8 : 0.5 L/hp (0.7 L/kW)
  • 3.0 V6 : 0.9 L/hp (1.2 L/kW)
  • R 5.0 V8 : 0.6 L/hp (0.8 L/kW)
  • 2.0 : 1 L/hp (1.4 L/kW)
  • P380 V6 : 0.8 L/hp (1.1 L/kW)
  • P340 V6 : 0.9 L/hp (1.2 L/kW)
  • P300 : 1 L/hp (1.4 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • SVR 5.0 V8 : 0.96 L/km-h (0.6 L/mph)
  • 3.0 V6 : 1.19 L/km-h (0.74 L/mph)
  • R 5.0 V8 : 1.03 L/km-h (0.64 L/mph)
  • 2.0 : 1.24 L/km-h (0.77 L/mph)
  • P380 V6 : 1.13 L/km-h (0.7 L/mph)
  • P340 V6 : 1.19 L/km-h (0.74 L/mph)
  • P300 : 1.24 L/km-h (0.77 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • SVR 5.0 V8 : 28.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 3.0 V6 : 31.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • R 5.0 V8 : 28.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 : 43.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • P380 V6 : 29.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • P340 V6 : 30.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • P300 : 39.2x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    SVR 5.0 V8 310 L 89 L to 1 s 4.4x 62x -168L
    3.0 V6 310 L 57 L to 1 s 4.4x 104x -168L
    R 5.0 V8 310 L 79 L to 1 s 4.4x 62x -168L
    2.0 310 L 57 L to 1 s 4.9x 155x -168L
    P380 V6 310 L 60 L to 1 s 4.4x 104x -168L
    P340 V6 310 L 57 L to 1 s 4.4x 104x -168L
    P300 310 L 57 L to 1 s 4.9x 155x -168L
    Vehicle SVR 5.0 V8
    Trunk space 310 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 89 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 62x
    Difference with world average -168L
    Vehicle 3.0 V6
    Trunk space 310 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 57 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 104x
    Difference with world average -168L
    Vehicle R 5.0 V8
    Trunk space 310 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 79 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 62x
    Difference with world average -168L
    Vehicle 2.0
    Trunk space 310 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 57 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 155x
    Difference with world average -168L
    Vehicle P380 V6
    Trunk space 310 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 60 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 104x
    Difference with world average -168L
    Vehicle P340 V6
    Trunk space 310 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 57 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 104x
    Difference with world average -168L
    Vehicle P300
    Trunk space 310 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 57 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 155x
    Difference with world average -168L

    Quick notes on Jaguar F-type trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 207 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 4.6 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 2.1 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 103.5 L
      • Max trunk load: 95 kg
      • Interior transformation: none
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 0.5 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 0.4 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 4 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • SVR 5.0 V8 : 0.4 L/hp (0.5 L/kW)
  • 3.0 V6 : 0.5 L/hp (0.7 L/kW)
  • R 5.0 V8 : 0.4 L/hp (0.5 L/kW)
  • 2.0 : 0.7 L/hp (0.9 L/kW)
  • P300 : 0.7 L/hp (0.9 L/kW)
  • P340 V6 : 0.6 L/hp (0.8 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • SVR 5.0 V8 : 0.66 L/km-h (0.41 L/mph)
  • 3.0 V6 : 0.75 L/km-h (0.47 L/mph)
  • R 5.0 V8 : 0.69 L/km-h (0.43 L/mph)
  • 2.0 : 0.83 L/km-h (0.52 L/mph)
  • P300 : 0.83 L/km-h (0.52 L/mph)
  • P340 V6 : 0.8 L/km-h (0.5 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • SVR 5.0 V8 : 19x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 3.0 V6 : 24.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • R 5.0 V8 : 19x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 : 28.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • P300 : 26.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • P340 V6 : 21.1x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    SVR 5.0 V8 207 L 59 L to 1 s 3x 41x -271L
    3.0 V6 207 L 44 L to 1 s 3x 69x -271L
    R 5.0 V8 207 L 53 L to 1 s 3x 41x -271L
    2.0 207 L 38 L to 1 s 3.3x 104x -271L
    P300 207 L 38 L to 1 s 3.3x 104x -271L
    P340 V6 207 L 41 L to 1 s 3x 69x -271L
    Vehicle SVR 5.0 V8
    Trunk space 207 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 59 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 41x
    Difference with world average -271L
    Vehicle 3.0 V6
    Trunk space 207 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 44 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 69x
    Difference with world average -271L
    Vehicle R 5.0 V8
    Trunk space 207 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 53 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 41x
    Difference with world average -271L
    Vehicle 2.0
    Trunk space 207 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 38 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 3.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 104x
    Difference with world average -271L
    Vehicle P300
    Trunk space 207 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 38 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 3.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 104x
    Difference with world average -271L
    Vehicle P340 V6
    Trunk space 207 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 41 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 69x
    Difference with world average -271L

    Quick notes on Jaguar F-type trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 299 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 6.6 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 3 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 149.5 L
      • Max trunk load: 98 kg
      • Interior transformation: none
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 0.7 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 0.5 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 4 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 5.0 V8 : 0.5 L/hp (0.7 L/kW)
  • 2.0 : 1 L/hp (1.4 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 5.0 V8 : 1 L/km-h (0.62 L/mph)
  • 2.0 : 1.2 L/km-h (0.75 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 5.0 V8 : 27.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 : 36.9x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    5.0 V8 299 L 85 L to 1 s 4.3x 60x -179L
    2.0 299 L 55 L to 1 s 4.7x 150x -179L
    Vehicle 5.0 V8
    Trunk space 299 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 85 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 60x
    Difference with world average -179L
    Vehicle 2.0
    Trunk space 299 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 55 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 150x
    Difference with world average -179L

    Quick notes on Jaguar F-type trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 233 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 5.2 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 2.3 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 116.5 L
      • Max trunk load: 99 kg
      • Interior transformation: none
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 0.5 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 0.4 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 4 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.0 : 0.8 L/hp (1.1 L/kW)
  • 5.0 V8 : 0.4 L/hp (0.6 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.0 : 0.93 L/km-h (0.58 L/mph)
  • 5.0 V8 : 0.78 L/km-h (0.48 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.0 : 28.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 5.0 V8 : 21.2x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.0 233 L 43 L to 1 s 3.7x 117x -245L
    5.0 V8 233 L 67 L to 1 s 3.3x 47x -245L
    Vehicle 2.0
    Trunk space 233 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 43 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 3.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 117x
    Difference with world average -245L
    Vehicle 5.0 V8
    Trunk space 233 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 67 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 3.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 47x
    Difference with world average -245L

    Quick notes on Jaguar F-type trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 338 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 7.5 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 3.4 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 169 L
      • Max trunk load: 100 kg
      • Interior transformation: none
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 0.7 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 0.6 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 3.0 V6 : 0.9 L/hp (1.3 L/kW)
  • S 3.0 V6 : 0.8 L/hp (1.1 L/kW)
  • R 5.0 V8 : 0.6 L/hp (0.8 L/kW)
  • SVR 5.0 V8 : 0.7 L/hp (1 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 3.0 V6 : 1.21 L/km-h (0.75 L/mph)
  • S 3.0 V6 : 1.15 L/km-h (0.71 L/mph)
  • R 5.0 V8 : 1.05 L/km-h (0.65 L/mph)
  • SVR 5.0 V8 : 1.27 L/km-h (0.79 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 3.0 V6 : 37.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • S 3.0 V6 : 38.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • R 5.0 V8 : 27.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • SVR 5.0 V8 : 36.1x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    3.0 V6 315 L 63 L to 1 s 4.5x 105x -163L
    S 3.0 V6 315 L 66 L to 1 s 4.5x 105x -163L
    R 5.0 V8 315 L 81 L to 1 s 4.5x 63x -163L
    SVR 5.0 V8 408 L 117 L to 1 s 5.8x 82x -70L
    Vehicle 3.0 V6
    Trunk space 315 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 63 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 105x
    Difference with world average -163L
    Vehicle S 3.0 V6
    Trunk space 315 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 66 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 105x
    Difference with world average -163L
    Vehicle R 5.0 V8
    Trunk space 315 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 81 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 63x
    Difference with world average -163L
    Vehicle SVR 5.0 V8
    Trunk space 408 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 117 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 82x
    Difference with world average -70L

    Quick notes on Jaguar F-type trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 905 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 20.1 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 9.1 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 452.5 L
      • Max trunk load: 100 kg
      • Interior transformation: none
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 1.9 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.6 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 10 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 3.0 V6 : 0.6 L/hp (0.8 L/kW)
  • S 3.0 V6 : 0.5 L/hp (0.7 L/kW)
  • R 5.0 V8 : 3.6 L/hp (4.8 L/kW)
  • SVR 5.0 V8 : 0.4 L/hp (0.5 L/kW)
  • 5.0 V8 : 4 L/hp (5.4 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 3.0 V6 : 0.75 L/km-h (0.47 L/mph)
  • S 3.0 V6 : 0.71 L/km-h (0.44 L/mph)
  • R 5.0 V8 : 6.54 L/km-h (4.06 L/mph)
  • SVR 5.0 V8 : 0.66 L/km-h (0.41 L/mph)
  • 5.0 V8 : 6.54 L/km-h (4.06 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 3.0 V6 : 23.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • S 3.0 V6 : 22.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • R 5.0 V8 : 173.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • SVR 5.0 V8 : 18.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 5.0 V8 : 176.8x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    3.0 V6 196 L 39 L to 1 s 2.8x 65x -282L
    S 3.0 V6 196 L 42 L to 1 s 2.8x 65x -282L
    R 5.0 V8 1962 L 503 L to 1 s 28x 392x +1484L
    SVR 5.0 V8 207 L 59 L to 1 s 3x 41x -271L
    5.0 V8 1962 L 479 L to 1 s 27.3x 392x +1484L
    Vehicle 3.0 V6
    Trunk space 196 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 39 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 65x
    Difference with world average -282L
    Vehicle S 3.0 V6
    Trunk space 196 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 42 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 65x
    Difference with world average -282L
    Vehicle R 5.0 V8
    Trunk space 1962 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 503 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 28x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 392x
    Difference with world average +1484L
    Vehicle SVR 5.0 V8
    Trunk space 207 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 59 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 41x
    Difference with world average -271L
    Vehicle 5.0 V8
    Trunk space 1962 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 479 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 27.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 392x
    Difference with world average +1484L