Jaguar XF Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Quick notes on Jaguar XF trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 519 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 11.5 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 5.2 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 103.8 L
    • Max trunk load: 104 kg
    • Interior transformation: limited
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 1.7 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 1 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.0d : 2.3 L/hp (3.1 L/kW)
  • 3.0d V6 : 1.7 L/hp (2.3 L/kW)
  • S 3.0 V6 : 1.3 L/hp (1.8 L/kW)
  • 3.0 V6 : 1.5 L/hp (2 L/kW)
  • 2.0 : 1.8 L/hp (2.4 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.0d : 2.2 L/km-h (1.37 L/mph)
  • 3.0d V6 : 2.02 L/km-h (1.26 L/mph)
  • S 3.0 V6 : 2.02 L/km-h (1.26 L/mph)
  • 3.0 V6 : 2.02 L/km-h (1.26 L/mph)
  • 2.0 : 2.16 L/km-h (1.34 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.0d : 98.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 3.0d V6 : 91.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • S 3.0 V6 : 58.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 3.0 V6 : 60.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 : 75x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.0d 540 L 87 L to 1 s 8.2x 270x +62L
    3.0d V6 505 L 86 L to 1 s 7.7x 169x +27L
    S 3.0 V6 505 L 101 L to 1 s 6.8x 169x +27L
    3.0 V6 505 L 99 L to 1 s 6.8x 169x +27L
    2.0 540 L 98 L to 1 s 7.3x 270x +62L
    Vehicle 2.0d
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 87 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 270x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle 3.0d V6
    Trunk space 505 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 86 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 169x
    Difference with world average +27L
    Vehicle S 3.0 V6
    Trunk space 505 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 101 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 169x
    Difference with world average +27L
    Vehicle 3.0 V6
    Trunk space 505 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 99 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 169x
    Difference with world average +27L
    Vehicle 2.0
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 98 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 270x
    Difference with world average +62L

    Quick notes on Jaguar XF trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 565 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 12.6 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 5.7 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 113 L
      • Max trunk load: 107 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.2 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 10 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.0d : 3.1 L/hp (4.3 L/kW)
  • 3.0 V6 : 1.5 L/hp (2 L/kW)
  • 2.0 : 2.3 L/hp (3.1 L/kW)
  • 3.0d V6 : 1.9 L/hp (2.6 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.0d : 2.58 L/km-h (1.6 L/mph)
  • 3.0 V6 : 2.26 L/km-h (1.4 L/mph)
  • 2.0 : 2.34 L/km-h (1.45 L/mph)
  • 3.0d V6 : 2.26 L/km-h (1.4 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.0d : 113x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 : 83.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 3.0d V6 : 99.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.0d 565 L 66 L to 1 s 8.6x 283x +87L
    3.0 V6 565 L 109 L to 1 s 7.6x 189x +87L
    2.0 565 L 84 L to 1 s 7.6x 283x +87L
    3.0d V6 565 L 90 L to 1 s 8.6x 189x +87L
    Vehicle 2.0d
    Trunk space 565 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 66 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 283x
    Difference with world average +87L
    Vehicle 3.0 V6
    Trunk space 565 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 109 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 189x
    Difference with world average +87L
    Vehicle 2.0
    Trunk space 565 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 84 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 283x
    Difference with world average +87L
    Vehicle 3.0d V6
    Trunk space 565 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 90 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 189x
    Difference with world average +87L

    Quick notes on Jaguar XF trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 550 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 12.2 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 5.5 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 110 L
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.3 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.2d : 2.8 L/hp (3.7 L/kW)
  • 3.0d : 2 L/hp (2.7 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.2d : 2.57 L/km-h (1.6 L/mph)
  • 3.0d : 2.2 L/km-h (1.37 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.2d : 107.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 3.0d : 90.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.2d 550 L 65 L to 1 s 7.8x 252x +72L
    3.0d 550 L 87 L to 1 s 7.8x 184x +72L
    Vehicle 2.2d
    Trunk space 550 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 65 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 252x
    Difference with world average +72L
    Vehicle 3.0d
    Trunk space 550 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 87 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 184x
    Difference with world average +72L

    Quick notes on Jaguar XF trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 649 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 14.4 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 6.5 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 129.8 L
      • Max trunk load: 106 kg
      • Interior transformation: limited
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 1.9 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.2 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 10 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.0 : 2.3 L/hp (3.1 L/kW)
  • 2.2d : 2.8 L/hp (3.9 L/kW)
  • 3.0 V6 : 3.9 L/hp (5.3 L/kW)
  • R-S 5.0 V8 : 1 L/hp (1.3 L/kW)
  • 3.0d V6 : 2 L/hp (2.7 L/kW)
  • 5.0 V8 : 2.4 L/hp (3.3 L/kW)
  • R 5.0 V8 : 1.1 L/hp (1.4 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.0 : 2.24 L/km-h (1.39 L/mph)
  • 2.2d : 2.4 L/km-h (1.49 L/mph)
  • 3.0 V6 : 3.89 L/km-h (2.42 L/mph)
  • R-S 5.0 V8 : 1.8 L/km-h (1.12 L/mph)
  • 3.0d V6 : 2.16 L/km-h (1.34 L/mph)
  • 5.0 V8 : 3.69 L/km-h (2.29 L/mph)
  • R 5.0 V8 : 2.16 L/km-h (1.34 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.0 : 66.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.2d : 100x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 3.0 V6 : 87.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • R-S 5.0 V8 : 46.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 3.0d V6 : 90x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 5.0 V8 : 83.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • R 5.0 V8 : 46.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.0 540 L 72 L to 1 s 7.7x 270x +62L
    2.2d 540 L 67 L to 1 s 7.7x 248x +62L
    3.0 V6 923 L 117 L to 1 s 14.4x 311x +445L
    R-S 5.0 V8 540 L 123 L to 1 s 7.7x 108x +62L
    3.0d V6 540 L 89 L to 1 s 7.7x 180x +62L
    5.0 V8 923 L 171 L to 1 s 14.4x 185x +445L
    R 5.0 V8 540 L 115 L to 1 s 7.7x 108x +62L
    Vehicle 2.0
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 72 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 270x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle 2.2d
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 67 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 248x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle 3.0 V6
    Trunk space 923 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 117 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 14.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 311x
    Difference with world average +445L
    Vehicle R-S 5.0 V8
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 123 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 108x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle 3.0d V6
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 89 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 180x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle 5.0 V8
    Trunk space 923 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 171 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 14.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 185x
    Difference with world average +445L
    Vehicle R 5.0 V8
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 115 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 108x
    Difference with world average +62L