Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 MPI | 502 L | - | 10x | 251x | +24L |
GT 1.6 T-GDI | 502 L | - | 10x | 316x | +24L |
Vehicle | 2.0 MPI |
---|---|
Trunk space | 502 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 10x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 251x |
Difference with world average | +24L |
Vehicle | GT 1.6 T-GDI |
Trunk space | 502 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 10x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 316x |
Difference with world average | +24L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 MPI | 428 L | - | 8.6x | 214x | -50L |
GT 1.6 T-GDI | 428 L | - | 8.6x | 269x | -50L |
Vehicle | 2.0 MPI |
---|---|
Trunk space | 428 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 214x |
Difference with world average | -50L |
Vehicle | GT 1.6 T-GDI |
Trunk space | 428 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 269x |
Difference with world average | -50L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 | 228 L | 18 L to 1 s | 4.1x | 143x | -250L |
2.0 | 228 L | 23 L to 1 s | 4.1x | 115x | -250L |
2.0 CRDi | 228 L | 21 L to 1 s | 4.1x | 115x | -250L |
1.5 CRDi | 228 L | 19 L to 1 s | 4.1x | 153x | -250L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 228 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 18 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 143x |
Difference with world average | -250L |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Trunk space | 228 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 23 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 115x |
Difference with world average | -250L |
Vehicle | 2.0 CRDi |
Trunk space | 228 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 21 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 115x |
Difference with world average | -250L |
Vehicle | 1.5 CRDi |
Trunk space | 228 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 19 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 153x |
Difference with world average | -250L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 | 381 L | 36 L to 1 s | 6.9x | 238x | -97L |
2.0 | 381 L | 44 L to 1 s | 6.9x | 193x | -97L |
2.0 CRDi | 381 L | 35 L to 1 s | 6.9x | 191x | -97L |
1.5 CRDi | 381 L | 32 L to 1 s | 6.9x | 255x | -97L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 381 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 36 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 238x |
Difference with world average | -97L |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Trunk space | 381 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 44 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 193x |
Difference with world average | -97L |
Vehicle | 2.0 CRDi |
Trunk space | 381 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 35 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 191x |
Difference with world average | -97L |
Vehicle | 1.5 CRDi |
Trunk space | 381 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 32 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 255x |
Difference with world average | -97L |