Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 | 255 L | 19 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 256x | -223L |
1.2 | 255 L | 20 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 204x | -223L |
1.0 T-GDi | 255 L | 27 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 256x | -223L |
Vehicle | 1.0 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 255 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 19 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 256x |
Difference with world average | -223L |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
Trunk space | 255 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 20 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 204x |
Difference with world average | -223L |
Vehicle | 1.0 T-GDi |
Trunk space | 255 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 27 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 256x |
Difference with world average | -223L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 | 200 L | 15 L to 1 s | 5.7x | 160x | -278L |
1.0 | 151 L | 11 L to 1 s | 4.3x | 151x | -327L |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 200 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 15 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 160x |
Difference with world average | -278L |
Vehicle | 1.0 |
Trunk space | 151 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 11 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 151x |
Difference with world average | -327L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 | 200 L | 14 L to 1 s | 5.7x | 200x | -278L |
1.2 | 200 L | 18 L to 1 s | 5.7x | 160x | -278L |
Vehicle | 1.0 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 200 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 14 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 200x |
Difference with world average | -278L |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
Trunk space | 200 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 18 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 160x |
Difference with world average | -278L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 16V | 200 L | 19 L to 1 s | 5.7x | 160x | -278L |
1.0 16V | 200 L | 15 L to 1 s | 5.7x | 200x | -278L |
1.0 12V LPI | 200 L | 15 L to 1 s | 5.7x | 200x | -278L |
Vehicle | 1.2 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 200 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 19 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 160x |
Difference with world average | -278L |
Vehicle | 1.0 16V |
Trunk space | 200 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 15 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 200x |
Difference with world average | -278L |
Vehicle | 1.0 12V LPI |
Trunk space | 200 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 15 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 200x |
Difference with world average | -278L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 16V | 200 L | 15 L to 1 s | 5.7x | 200x | -278L |
1.0 12V LPI | 200 L | 15 L to 1 s | 5.7x | 200x | -278L |
1.2 16V | 200 L | 19 L to 1 s | 5.7x | 160x | -278L |
Vehicle | 1.0 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 200 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 15 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 200x |
Difference with world average | -278L |
Vehicle | 1.0 12V LPI |
Trunk space | 200 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 15 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 200x |
Difference with world average | -278L |
Vehicle | 1.2 16V |
Trunk space | 200 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 19 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 160x |
Difference with world average | -278L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.1i 12V | 220 L | 15 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 203x | -258L |
1.0 i 12V | 220 L | 14 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 220x | -258L |
Vehicle | 1.1i 12V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 220 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 15 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 203x |
Difference with world average | -258L |
Vehicle | 1.0 i 12V |
Trunk space | 220 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 14 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 220x |
Difference with world average | -258L |