Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 T-GDI | 325 L | 34 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 326x | -153L |
1.4 MPI | 325 L | 28 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 238x | -153L |
1.4 CRDi | 325 L | 24 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 233x | -153L |
1.25 MPI | 325 L | 26 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 260x | -153L |
Vehicle | 1.0 T-GDI |
---|---|
Trunk space | 325 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 34 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 326x |
Difference with world average | -153L |
Vehicle | 1.4 MPI |
Trunk space | 325 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 28 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 238x |
Difference with world average | -153L |
Vehicle | 1.4 CRDi |
Trunk space | 325 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 24 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 233x |
Difference with world average | -153L |
Vehicle | 1.25 MPI |
Trunk space | 325 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 26 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 260x |
Difference with world average | -153L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4 | 288 L | 23 L to 1 s | 6.7x | 206x | -190L |
1.4 CRDI | 288 L | 22 L to 1 s | 6.7x | 206x | -190L |
1.2 | 288 L | 23 L to 1 s | 6.7x | 231x | -190L |
1.1 CRDI | 288 L | 18 L to 1 s | 6.7x | 257x | -190L |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 288 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 23 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 206x |
Difference with world average | -190L |
Vehicle | 1.4 CRDI |
Trunk space | 288 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 22 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 206x |
Difference with world average | -190L |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
Trunk space | 288 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 23 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 231x |
Difference with world average | -190L |
Vehicle | 1.1 CRDI |
Trunk space | 288 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 18 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 257x |
Difference with world average | -190L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 16V | 224 L | 18 L to 1 s | 5.2x | 179x | -254L |
1.4 16V | 224 L | 18 L to 1 s | 5.2x | 160x | -254L |
1.1 12V | 224 L | 15 L to 1 s | 5.2x | 200x | -254L |
Vehicle | 1.2 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 224 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 18 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 179x |
Difference with world average | -254L |
Vehicle | 1.4 16V |
Trunk space | 224 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 18 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 160x |
Difference with world average | -254L |
Vehicle | 1.1 12V |
Trunk space | 224 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 15 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 200x |
Difference with world average | -254L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 16V | 500 L | 40 L to 1 s | 11.6x | 401x | +22L |
1.4 16V | 500 L | 46 L to 1 s | 11.6x | 358x | +22L |
1.4 CRDi 16V | 500 L | 37 L to 1 s | 11.6x | 358x | +22L |
1.1 CRDi 12V | 500 L | 33 L to 1 s | 11.6x | 446x | +22L |
Vehicle | 1.2 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 500 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 40 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 401x |
Difference with world average | +22L |
Vehicle | 1.4 16V |
Trunk space | 500 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 46 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 358x |
Difference with world average | +22L |
Vehicle | 1.4 CRDi 16V |
Trunk space | 500 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 37 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 358x |
Difference with world average | +22L |
Vehicle | 1.1 CRDi 12V |
Trunk space | 500 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 33 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 446x |
Difference with world average | +22L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6i 16V | 272 L | 28 L to 1 s | 6x | 170x | -206L |
Vehicle | 1.6i 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 272 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 28 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 170x |
Difference with world average | -206L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6i 16V | 337 L | 35 L to 1 s | 7.5x | 211x | -141L |
Vehicle | 1.6i 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 337 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 35 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 211x |
Difference with world average | -141L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.3i | 326 L | 24 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 243x | -152L |
Vehicle | 1.3i |
---|---|
Trunk space | 326 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 24 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 243x |
Difference with world average | -152L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.3 i | 449 L | 33 L to 1 s | 10x | 334x | -29L |
Vehicle | 1.3 i |
---|---|
Trunk space | 449 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 33 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 334x |
Difference with world average | -29L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5i 16V | 326 L | 30 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 218x | -152L |
1.3i | 261 L | 19 L to 1 s | 5.8x | 194x | -217L |
Vehicle | 1.5i 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 326 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 30 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 218x |
Difference with world average | -152L |
Vehicle | 1.3i |
Trunk space | 261 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 19 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 194x |
Difference with world average | -217L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5i 16V | 405 L | 37 L to 1 s | 9x | 271x | -73L |
1.5 i 16V | 499 L | 37 L to 1 s | 11.1x | 334x | +21L |
1.3 i | 449 L | 33 L to 1 s | 10x | 334x | -29L |
Vehicle | 1.5i 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 405 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 37 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 271x |
Difference with world average | -73L |
Vehicle | 1.5 i 16V |
Trunk space | 499 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 37 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 334x |
Difference with world average | +21L |
Vehicle | 1.3 i |
Trunk space | 449 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 33 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 334x |
Difference with world average | -29L |