| Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RS 5.0 V8 | 150 L | - | 1.8x | 30x | -328L |
| 5.0 V8 | 120 L | 41 L to 1 s | 1.5x | 24x | -358L |
| S 5.0 V8 | 120 L | 43 L to 1 s | 1.5x | 24x | -358L |
| R 5.0 V8 | 120 L | 44 L to 1 s | 1.5x | 24x | -358L |
| Vehicle | RS 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|
| Trunk space | 150 L |
| Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
| Trunk space to tank size | 1.8x |
| Trunk space to engine capacity | 30x |
| Difference with world average | -328L |
| Vehicle | 5.0 V8 |
| Trunk space | 120 L |
| Trunk to acceleration ratio | 41 L to 1 s |
| Trunk space to tank size | 1.5x |
| Trunk space to engine capacity | 24x |
| Difference with world average | -358L |
| Vehicle | S 5.0 V8 |
| Trunk space | 120 L |
| Trunk to acceleration ratio | 43 L to 1 s |
| Trunk space to tank size | 1.5x |
| Trunk space to engine capacity | 24x |
| Difference with world average | -358L |
| Vehicle | R 5.0 V8 |
| Trunk space | 120 L |
| Trunk to acceleration ratio | 44 L to 1 s |
| Trunk space to tank size | 1.5x |
| Trunk space to engine capacity | 24x |
| Difference with world average | -358L |
