Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 | 520 L | 47 L to 1 s | 10.4x | 326x | +42L |
1.6 16V | 520 L | 46 L to 1 s | 10.4x | 326x | +42L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 47 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 326x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 46 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 326x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 16V | 240 L | 24 L to 1 s | 4.8x | 150x | -238L |
1.6 | 240 L | 21 L to 1 s | 4.8x | 150x | -238L |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 240 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 24 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 150x |
Difference with world average | -238L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Trunk space | 240 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 21 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 150x |
Difference with world average | -238L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 16V | 360 L | 29 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 226x | -118L |
1.6 | 360 L | 32 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 226x | -118L |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 360 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 29 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 226x |
Difference with world average | -118L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Trunk space | 360 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 32 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 226x |
Difference with world average | -118L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 16V | 435 L | 35 L to 1 s | 8.7x | 273x | -43L |
1.6 | 435 L | 39 L to 1 s | 8.7x | 273x | -43L |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 435 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 35 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 273x |
Difference with world average | -43L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Trunk space | 435 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 39 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 273x |
Difference with world average | -43L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 | 440 L | 38 L to 1 s | 8.8x | 276x | -38L |
1.6 16V | 440 L | 34 L to 1 s | 8.8x | 276x | -38L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 440 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 38 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 276x |
Difference with world average | -38L |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
Trunk space | 440 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 34 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 276x |
Difference with world average | -38L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 | 520 L | 58 L to 1 s | 10.4x | 326x | +42L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 58 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 326x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 | 520 L | 50 L to 1 s | 10.4x | 326x | +42L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 50 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 326x |
Difference with world average | +42L |