Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 | 430 L | 36 L to 1 s | 10x | 269x | -48L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 430 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 36 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 269x |
Difference with world average | -48L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 | 360 L | 33 L to 1 s | 8.4x | 226x | -118L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 360 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 33 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 226x |
Difference with world average | -118L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 | 444 L | 41 L to 1 s | 10.3x | 278x | -34L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 444 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 41 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 278x |
Difference with world average | -34L |