cat_logo
HomeLancia

Delta

Lancia Delta Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Choose Generation

Quick notes on Lancia Delta trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 380 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 8.4 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 3.8 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 76 L
    • Max trunk load: 88 kg
    • Interior transformation: flexible
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.6 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.3 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.4T-Jet 16V : 2.5 L/hp (3.5 L/kW)
  • 1.6JTD Multijet 16V : 3.2 L/hp (4.3 L/kW)
  • 2.0JTD Multijet 16V : 2.3 L/hp (3.1 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.4T-Jet 16V : 1.81 L/km-h (1.12 L/mph)
  • 1.6JTD Multijet 16V : 1.95 L/km-h (1.21 L/mph)
  • 2.0JTD Multijet 16V : 1.79 L/km-h (1.11 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.4T-Jet 16V : 54.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6JTD Multijet 16V : 77.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0JTD Multijet 16V : 71.7x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.4T-Jet 16V 380 L 46 L to 1 s 6.7x 278x -98L
    1.6JTD Multijet 16V 380 L 37 L to 1 s 6.7x 238x -98L
    2.0JTD Multijet 16V 380 L 47 L to 1 s 6.7x 194x -98L
    Vehicle 1.4T-Jet 16V
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 46 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 278x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 1.6JTD Multijet 16V
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 37 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 238x
    Difference with world average -98L
    Vehicle 2.0JTD Multijet 16V
    Trunk space 380 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 47 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 194x
    Difference with world average -98L

    Quick notes on Lancia Delta trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 322 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 7.2 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 3.2 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 64.4 L
      • Max trunk load: 73 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.8 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.9 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.6 : 3.3 L/hp (4.4 L/kW)
  • 1.6 i.e. : 4.1 L/hp (5.6 L/kW)
  • 1.8 : 3.4 L/hp (4.7 L/kW)
  • 1.8 GT : 2.7 L/hp (3.7 L/kW)
  • 1.8 i.e. : 3 L/hp (4.1 L/kW)
  • 1.9 TD : 3.7 L/hp (5.1 L/kW)
  • 2.0 16V : 2.2 L/hp (3 L/kW)
  • 2.0 Turbo : 1.7 L/hp (2.3 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.6 : 1.76 L/km-h (1.09 L/mph)
  • 1.6 i.e. : 1.8 L/km-h (1.12 L/mph)
  • 1.8 : 1.72 L/km-h (1.07 L/mph)
  • 1.8 GT : 1.78 L/km-h (1.11 L/mph)
  • 1.9 TD : 1.86 L/km-h (1.16 L/mph)
  • 2.0 16V : 1.5 L/km-h (0.93 L/mph)
  • 2.0 Turbo : 1.41 L/km-h (0.88 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.6 i.e. : 37.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.8 : 34.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 16V : 33.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 Turbo : 31.6x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.6 335 L 32 L to 1 s 6.7x 212x -143L
    1.6 i.e. 310 L 24 L to 1 s 5.6x 196x -168L
    1.8 310 L 26 L to 1 s 5.6x 177x -168L
    1.8 GT 355 L 40 L to 1 s 5.9x 203x -123L
    1.8 i.e. 310 L - 5.6x 177x -168L
    1.9 TD 335 L 29 L to 1 s 6.1x 174x -143L
    2.0 16V 310 L 34 L to 1 s 5.6x 155x -168L
    2.0 Turbo 310 L 44 L to 1 s 4.9x 155x -168L
    Vehicle 1.6
    Trunk space 335 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 32 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 212x
    Difference with world average -143L
    Vehicle 1.6 i.e.
    Trunk space 310 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 24 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 196x
    Difference with world average -168L
    Vehicle 1.8
    Trunk space 310 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 26 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 177x
    Difference with world average -168L
    Vehicle 1.8 GT
    Trunk space 355 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 40 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 203x
    Difference with world average -123L
    Vehicle 1.8 i.e.
    Trunk space 310 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 177x
    Difference with world average -168L
    Vehicle 1.9 TD
    Trunk space 335 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 29 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 174x
    Difference with world average -143L
    Vehicle 2.0 16V
    Trunk space 310 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 34 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 155x
    Difference with world average -168L
    Vehicle 2.0 Turbo
    Trunk space 310 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 44 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 155x
    Difference with world average -168L