Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 16V | 420 L | 43 L to 1 s | 7x | 240x | -58L |
1.9 JTD | 420 L | 41 L to 1 s | 7x | 220x | -58L |
1.6 16V | 420 L | 39 L to 1 s | 7x | 266x | -58L |
2.4 JTD | 420 L | 47 L to 1 s | 7x | 176x | -58L |
2.0 20V | 420 L | 46 L to 1 s | 7x | 210x | -58L |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 420 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 43 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 240x |
Difference with world average | -58L |
Vehicle | 1.9 JTD |
Trunk space | 420 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 41 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 220x |
Difference with world average | -58L |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
Trunk space | 420 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 39 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 266x |
Difference with world average | -58L |
Vehicle | 2.4 JTD |
Trunk space | 420 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 47 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 176x |
Difference with world average | -58L |
Vehicle | 2.0 20V |
Trunk space | 420 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 46 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 210x |
Difference with world average | -58L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 16V | 420 L | 37 L to 1 s | 7x | 266x | -58L |
1.8 16V | 420 L | 41 L to 1 s | 7x | 240x | -58L |
1.9 JTD | 420 L | 39 L to 1 s | 7x | 220x | -58L |
2.0 20V | 420 L | 45 L to 1 s | 7x | 210x | -58L |
2.4 JTD | 1300 L | 141 L to 1 s | 21.7x | 545x | +822L |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 420 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 37 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 266x |
Difference with world average | -58L |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
Trunk space | 420 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 41 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 240x |
Difference with world average | -58L |
Vehicle | 1.9 JTD |
Trunk space | 420 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 39 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 220x |
Difference with world average | -58L |
Vehicle | 2.0 20V |
Trunk space | 420 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 45 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 210x |
Difference with world average | -58L |
Vehicle | 2.4 JTD |
Trunk space | 1300 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 141 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 21.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 545x |
Difference with world average | +822L |