Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2000 16V | 440 L | 49 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 221x | -38L |
2850 V6 i.e. | 440 L | 55 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 154x | -38L |
2000 16V Turbo | 440 L | 58 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 221x | -38L |
2000 i.e. | 440 L | 44 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 221x | -38L |
2500 Turbo DS | 440 L | 42 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 176x | -38L |
8.32 | 440 L | 65 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 150x | -38L |
Vehicle | 2000 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 440 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 49 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 221x |
Difference with world average | -38L |
Vehicle | 2850 V6 i.e. |
Trunk space | 440 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 55 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 154x |
Difference with world average | -38L |
Vehicle | 2000 16V Turbo |
Trunk space | 440 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 58 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 221x |
Difference with world average | -38L |
Vehicle | 2000 i.e. |
Trunk space | 440 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 44 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 221x |
Difference with world average | -38L |
Vehicle | 2500 Turbo DS |
Trunk space | 440 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 42 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 176x |
Difference with world average | -38L |
Vehicle | 8.32 |
Trunk space | 440 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 65 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 150x |
Difference with world average | -38L |