Lancia Thema Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Choose Generation

Quick notes on Lancia Thema trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 440 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 9.8 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 4.4 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 88 L
    • Max trunk load: 78 kg
    • Interior transformation: limited
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.8 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.9 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2000 16V : 2.9 L/hp (3.9 L/kW)
  • 2850 V6 i.e. : 2.9 L/hp (4 L/kW)
  • 2000 16V Turbo : 2.4 L/hp (3.3 L/kW)
  • 2000 i.e. : 3.7 L/hp (5 L/kW)
  • 2500 Turbo DS : 3.7 L/hp (5.1 L/kW)
  • 8.32 : 2 L/hp (2.8 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2000 16V : 2.15 L/km-h (1.34 L/mph)
  • 2850 V6 i.e. : 2.15 L/km-h (1.34 L/mph)
  • 2000 16V Turbo : 1.98 L/km-h (1.23 L/mph)
  • 2000 i.e. : 2.26 L/km-h (1.4 L/mph)
  • 2500 Turbo DS : 2.26 L/km-h (1.4 L/mph)
  • 8.32 : 1.88 L/km-h (1.17 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2000 16V : 53.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2850 V6 i.e. : 46.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2000 16V Turbo : 48.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2000 i.e. : 52.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2500 Turbo DS : 62.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 8.32 : 41.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2000 16V 440 L 49 L to 1 s 6.3x 221x -38L
    2850 V6 i.e. 440 L 55 L to 1 s 6.3x 154x -38L
    2000 16V Turbo 440 L 58 L to 1 s 6.3x 221x -38L
    2000 i.e. 440 L 44 L to 1 s 6.3x 221x -38L
    2500 Turbo DS 440 L 42 L to 1 s 6.3x 176x -38L
    8.32 440 L 65 L to 1 s 6.3x 150x -38L
    Vehicle 2000 16V
    Trunk space 440 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 49 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 221x
    Difference with world average -38L
    Vehicle 2850 V6 i.e.
    Trunk space 440 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 55 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 154x
    Difference with world average -38L
    Vehicle 2000 16V Turbo
    Trunk space 440 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 58 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 221x
    Difference with world average -38L
    Vehicle 2000 i.e.
    Trunk space 440 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 44 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 221x
    Difference with world average -38L
    Vehicle 2500 Turbo DS
    Trunk space 440 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 42 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 176x
    Difference with world average -38L
    Vehicle 8.32
    Trunk space 440 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 65 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 150x
    Difference with world average -38L