Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 TD4 | 755 L | 68 L to 1 s | 10.8x | 346x | +277L |
3.2 i V6 24V | 755 L | 89 L to 1 s | 10.8x | 237x | +277L |
Vehicle | 2.2 TD4 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 755 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 68 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 346x |
Difference with world average | +277L |
Vehicle | 3.2 i V6 24V |
Trunk space | 755 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 89 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 237x |
Difference with world average | +277L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 TD4 | 354 L | 26 L to 1 s | 5.9x | 182x | -124L |
1.8 i 16V | 370 L | 33 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 206x | -108L |
2.0 DI | 370 L | 26 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 186x | -108L |
2.5 V6 24V | 354 L | 34 L to 1 s | 5.9x | 142x | -124L |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD4 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 354 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 26 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 182x |
Difference with world average | -124L |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
Trunk space | 370 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 33 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 206x |
Difference with world average | -108L |
Vehicle | 2.0 DI |
Trunk space | 370 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 26 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 186x |
Difference with world average | -108L |
Vehicle | 2.5 V6 24V |
Trunk space | 354 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 34 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 142x |
Difference with world average | -124L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 TD4 | 311 L | 23 L to 1 s | 5.2x | 159x | -167L |
2.0 DI | 370 L | 26 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 186x | -108L |
1.8 i 16V | 370 L | 33 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 206x | -108L |
2.5 V6 24V | 311 L | 30 L to 1 s | 5.2x | 125x | -167L |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD4 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 311 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 23 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 159x |
Difference with world average | -167L |
Vehicle | 2.0 DI |
Trunk space | 370 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 26 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 186x |
Difference with world average | -108L |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
Trunk space | 370 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 33 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 206x |
Difference with world average | -108L |
Vehicle | 2.5 V6 24V |
Trunk space | 311 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 30 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 125x |
Difference with world average | -167L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 i 16V | 311 L | 26 L to 1 s | 5.2x | 173x | -167L |
2.0 TD | 311 L | 23 L to 1 s | 5.2x | 159x | -167L |
2.5 i V6 24V | 311 L | 30 L to 1 s | 5.2x | 125x | -167L |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 311 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 26 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 173x |
Difference with world average | -167L |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD |
Trunk space | 311 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 23 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 159x |
Difference with world average | -167L |
Vehicle | 2.5 i V6 24V |
Trunk space | 311 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 30 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 125x |
Difference with world average | -167L |