Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
300 V6 | 294 L | - | 4.5x | 85x | -184L |
350 V6 | 294 L | - | 4.5x | 85x | -184L |
300 | 294 L | 41 L to 1 s | 4.5x | 147x | -184L |
Vehicle | 300 V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 294 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 85x |
Difference with world average | -184L |
Vehicle | 350 V6 |
Trunk space | 294 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 85x |
Difference with world average | -184L |
Vehicle | 300 |
Trunk space | 294 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 41 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 147x |
Difference with world average | -184L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
F 5.0 | 286 L | - | 4.3x | 58x | -192L |
300 | 294 L | - | 4.5x | 147x | -184L |
300 V6 | 294 L | - | 4.5x | 85x | -184L |
350 V6 | 294 L | - | 4.5x | 85x | -184L |
Vehicle | F 5.0 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 286 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 58x |
Difference with world average | -192L |
Vehicle | 300 |
Trunk space | 294 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 147x |
Difference with world average | -184L |
Vehicle | 300 V6 |
Trunk space | 294 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 85x |
Difference with world average | -184L |
Vehicle | 350 V6 |
Trunk space | 294 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 85x |
Difference with world average | -184L |