Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.0 V6 | 520 L | - | 7.6x | - | +42L |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | - |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.6 i V8 32V AWD | 351 L | 49 L to 1 s | 4.1x | 76x | -127L |
4.6 i V8 32V | 351 L | 37 L to 1 s | 4.1x | 76x | -127L |
Vehicle | 4.6 i V8 32V AWD |
---|---|
Trunk space | 351 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 49 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 76x |
Difference with world average | -127L |
Vehicle | 4.6 i V8 32V |
Trunk space | 351 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 37 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 76x |
Difference with world average | -127L |