Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i V6 Turbo | 427 L | - | 6.1x | 214x | -51L |
2.0 i V6 | 427 L | - | 6.1x | 214x | -51L |
2.2i 12V | 427 L | - | 6.1x | 196x | -51L |
3.0 i V6 | 427 L | 52 L to 1 s | 6.1x | 145x | -51L |
3.0 i V6 24V | 427 L | - | 6.1x | 145x | -51L |
Vehicle | 2.0 i V6 Turbo |
---|---|
Trunk space | 427 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 214x |
Difference with world average | -51L |
Vehicle | 2.0 i V6 |
Trunk space | 427 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 214x |
Difference with world average | -51L |
Vehicle | 2.2i 12V |
Trunk space | 427 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 196x |
Difference with world average | -51L |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 |
Trunk space | 427 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 52 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 145x |
Difference with world average | -51L |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V |
Trunk space | 427 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 145x |
Difference with world average | -51L |