Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 SKYACTIV-D | 494 L | 54 L to 1 s | 8.5x | 225x | +16L |
2.5 SKYACTIV-G | 875 L | - | 15.6x | 352x | +397L |
2.0 SKYACTIV-G | 506 L | 49 L to 1 s | 8.7x | 253x | +28L |
2.5 Turbo SKYACTIV-G | 875 L | - | 15.6x | 352x | +397L |
Vehicle | 2.2 SKYACTIV-D |
---|---|
Trunk space | 494 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 54 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 225x |
Difference with world average | +16L |
Vehicle | 2.5 SKYACTIV-G |
Trunk space | 875 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 15.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 352x |
Difference with world average | +397L |
Vehicle | 2.0 SKYACTIV-G |
Trunk space | 506 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 49 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 253x |
Difference with world average | +28L |
Vehicle | 2.5 Turbo SKYACTIV-G |
Trunk space | 875 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 15.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 352x |
Difference with world average | +397L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i | 503 L | 58 L to 1 s | 8.7x | 252x | +25L |
2.5i | 503 L | 66 L to 1 s | 8.7x | 202x | +25L |
2.2d | 503 L | 60 L to 1 s | 8.7x | 230x | +25L |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
---|---|
Trunk space | 503 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 58 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 252x |
Difference with world average | +25L |
Vehicle | 2.5i |
Trunk space | 503 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 66 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 202x |
Difference with world average | +25L |
Vehicle | 2.2d |
Trunk space | 503 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 60 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 230x |
Difference with world average | +25L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 | 503 L | 58 L to 1 s | 9x | 252x | +25L |
2.2 | 503 L | 52 L to 1 s | 8.7x | 230x | +25L |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 503 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 58 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 252x |
Difference with world average | +25L |
Vehicle | 2.2 |
Trunk space | 503 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 52 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 230x |
Difference with world average | +25L |