Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.3 i | 330 L | - | 7.3x | 245x | -148L |
1.5 i 16V | 330 L | - | 7.3x | 220x | -148L |
Vehicle | 1.3 i |
---|---|
Trunk space | 330 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 245x |
Difference with world average | -148L |
Vehicle | 1.5 i 16V |
Trunk space | 330 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 220x |
Difference with world average | -148L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 16V | 330 L | 27 L to 1 s | 8.3x | 220x | -148L |
1.3 16V | 330 L | 27 L to 1 s | 8.3x | 249x | -148L |
Vehicle | 1.5 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 330 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 27 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 220x |
Difference with world average | -148L |
Vehicle | 1.3 16V |
Trunk space | 330 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 27 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 249x |
Difference with world average | -148L |