Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 CRDi | 294 L | 24 L to 1 s | 3.9x | 147x | -184L |
2.0 | 294 L | 22 L to 1 s | 4.2x | 148x | -184L |
2.3i 16V | 294 L | 24 L to 1 s | 4.2x | 130x | -184L |
2.5 24V | 481 L | 36 L to 1 s | 6.9x | 193x | +3L |
3.0 i V6 24V | 294 L | 26 L to 1 s | 3.9x | 99x | -184L |
Vehicle | 2.0 CRDi |
---|---|
Trunk space | 294 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 24 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 3.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 147x |
Difference with world average | -184L |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Trunk space | 294 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 22 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 148x |
Difference with world average | -184L |
Vehicle | 2.3i 16V |
Trunk space | 294 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 24 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 130x |
Difference with world average | -184L |
Vehicle | 2.5 24V |
Trunk space | 481 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 36 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 193x |
Difference with world average | +3L |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V |
Trunk space | 294 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 26 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 3.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 99x |
Difference with world average | -184L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.0 i V6 | 335 L | - | 4.5x | 113x | -143L |
2.5 TD | 282 L | 18 L to 1 s | 3.8x | 113x | -196L |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 335 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 113x |
Difference with world average | -143L |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
Trunk space | 282 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 18 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 3.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 113x |
Difference with world average | -196L |