Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 SkyActiv-G | 130 L | - | 2.9x | 65x | -348L |
Vehicle | 2.0 SkyActiv-G |
---|---|
Trunk space | 130 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 2.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 65x |
Difference with world average | -348L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 SkyActiv-G | 127 L | - | 2.8x | 64x | -351L |
1.5 SkyActiv-G | 127 L | 15 L to 1 s | 2.8x | 85x | -351L |
Vehicle | 2.0 SkyActiv-G |
---|---|
Trunk space | 127 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 2.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 64x |
Difference with world average | -351L |
Vehicle | 1.5 SkyActiv-G |
Trunk space | 127 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 15 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 2.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 85x |
Difference with world average | -351L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 SkyActiv G | 130 L | 16 L to 1 s | 2.9x | 87x | -348L |
2.0 SkyActiv G | 130 L | 19 L to 1 s | 2.9x | 65x | -348L |
Vehicle | 1.5 SkyActiv G |
---|---|
Trunk space | 130 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 16 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 2.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 87x |
Difference with world average | -348L |
Vehicle | 2.0 SkyActiv G |
Trunk space | 130 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 19 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 2.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 65x |
Difference with world average | -348L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 MZR | 150 L | 16 L to 1 s | 3x | 83x | -328L |
2.0 MZR | 150 L | 20 L to 1 s | 3x | 75x | -328L |
Vehicle | 1.8 MZR |
---|---|
Trunk space | 150 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 16 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 83x |
Difference with world average | -328L |
Vehicle | 2.0 MZR |
Trunk space | 150 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 20 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 75x |
Difference with world average | -328L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 MZR | 150 L | 16 L to 1 s | 3x | 83x | -328L |
2.0 MZR | 150 L | 21 L to 1 s | 3x | 75x | -328L |
Vehicle | 1.8 MZR |
---|---|
Trunk space | 150 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 16 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 83x |
Difference with world average | -328L |
Vehicle | 2.0 MZR |
Trunk space | 150 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 21 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 75x |
Difference with world average | -328L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 i 16V | 150 L | 17 L to 1 s | 3x | 83x | -328L |
2.0 i 16V R5 | 150 L | 20 L to 1 s | 3x | 75x | -328L |
2.0 i 16V | 150 L | - | 3x | 75x | -328L |
2.0 i 16V R6 | 150 L | 20 L to 1 s | 3x | 75x | -328L |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 150 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 17 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 83x |
Difference with world average | -328L |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V R5 |
Trunk space | 150 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 20 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 75x |
Difference with world average | -328L |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Trunk space | 150 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 75x |
Difference with world average | -328L |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V R6 |
Trunk space | 150 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 20 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 75x |
Difference with world average | -328L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 i 16V | 150 L | 16 L to 1 s | 3x | 83x | -328L |
2.0 i 16V | 150 L | 19 L to 1 s | 3x | 75x | -328L |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 150 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 16 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 83x |
Difference with world average | -328L |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Trunk space | 150 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 19 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 75x |
Difference with world average | -328L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 i 16V | 145 L | 16 L to 1 s | 2.9x | 91x | -333L |
1.8i 16V | 145 L | 18 L to 1 s | 2.9x | 79x | -333L |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 145 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 16 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 2.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 91x |
Difference with world average | -333L |
Vehicle | 1.8i 16V |
Trunk space | 145 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 18 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 2.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 79x |
Difference with world average | -333L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 | 135 L | 16 L to 1 s | 2.8x | 84x | -343L |
1.8 | 135 L | 17 L to 1 s | 2.8x | 73x | -343L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 135 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 16 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 2.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 84x |
Difference with world average | -343L |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Trunk space | 135 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 17 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 2.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 73x |
Difference with world average | -343L |