Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
B 200d | 445 L | 56 L to 1 s | 10.3x | 228x | -33L |
B 220d | 445 L | 65 L to 1 s | 10.3x | 228x | -33L |
B 180 | 445 L | 50 L to 1 s | 10.3x | 334x | -33L |
B 200 | 445 L | 55 L to 1 s | 10.3x | 334x | -33L |
B 180d | 445 L | 44 L to 1 s | 10.3x | 305x | -33L |
B 250 | 445 L | 73 L to 1 s | 10.3x | 224x | -33L |
B 220 | 455 L | 68 L to 1 s | 10.6x | 229x | -23L |
B 160 | 455 L | 43 L to 1 s | 10.6x | 342x | -23L |
Vehicle | B 200d |
---|---|
Trunk space | 445 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 56 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 228x |
Difference with world average | -33L |
Vehicle | B 220d |
Trunk space | 445 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 65 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 228x |
Difference with world average | -33L |
Vehicle | B 180 |
Trunk space | 445 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 50 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 334x |
Difference with world average | -33L |
Vehicle | B 200 |
Trunk space | 445 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 55 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 334x |
Difference with world average | -33L |
Vehicle | B 180d |
Trunk space | 445 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 44 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 305x |
Difference with world average | -33L |
Vehicle | B 250 |
Trunk space | 445 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 73 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 224x |
Difference with world average | -33L |
Vehicle | B 220 |
Trunk space | 455 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 68 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 229x |
Difference with world average | -23L |
Vehicle | B 160 |
Trunk space | 455 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 43 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 342x |
Difference with world average | -23L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
B 160 CDI | 488 L | 36 L to 1 s | 9.8x | 334x | +10L |
B 180 CDI | 488 L | 44 L to 1 s | 12.2x | 334x | +10L |
B 200 CDI | 488 L | 52 L to 1 s | 8.7x | 228x | +10L |
B 180 | 488 L | 57 L to 1 s | 9.8x | 306x | +10L |
B 220 CDI | 488 L | 62 L to 1 s | 8.7x | 228x | +10L |
B 200 | 501 L | 58 L to 1 s | - | 252x | +23L |
B 250 | 488 L | 76 L to 1 s | 8.7x | 245x | +10L |
B 220 | 488 L | 69 L to 1 s | 8.7x | 245x | +10L |
B 160 | 488 L | 48 L to 1 s | 9.8x | 306x | +10L |
Vehicle | B 160 CDI |
---|---|
Trunk space | 488 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 36 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 334x |
Difference with world average | +10L |
Vehicle | B 180 CDI |
Trunk space | 488 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 44 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 12.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 334x |
Difference with world average | +10L |
Vehicle | B 200 CDI |
Trunk space | 488 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 52 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 228x |
Difference with world average | +10L |
Vehicle | B 180 |
Trunk space | 488 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 57 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 306x |
Difference with world average | +10L |
Vehicle | B 220 CDI |
Trunk space | 488 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 62 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 228x |
Difference with world average | +10L |
Vehicle | B 200 |
Trunk space | 501 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 58 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | - |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 252x |
Difference with world average | +23L |
Vehicle | B 250 |
Trunk space | 488 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 76 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 245x |
Difference with world average | +10L |
Vehicle | B 220 |
Trunk space | 488 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 69 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 245x |
Difference with world average | +10L |
Vehicle | B 160 |
Trunk space | 488 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 48 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 306x |
Difference with world average | +10L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
28 kWh | 501 L | 67 L to 1 s | - | - | +23L |
Vehicle | 28 kWh |
---|---|
Trunk space | 501 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 67 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | - |
Trunk space to engine capacity | - |
Difference with world average | +23L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
B 180 | 488 L | 50 L to 1 s | 9.8x | 306x | +10L |
B 180 CDI | 488 L | 43 L to 1 s | 9.8x | 334x | +10L |
B 200 CDI | 488 L | 55 L to 1 s | 9.8x | 272x | +10L |
B 200 | 488 L | 61 L to 1 s | 9.8x | 306x | +10L |
B 160 CDI | 488 L | 37 L to 1 s | 9.8x | 334x | +10L |
B 180 1.8 CDI | 488 L | 48 L to 1 s | 9.8x | 272x | +10L |
B 220 CDI | 488 L | 62 L to 1 s | 9.8x | 228x | +10L |
B 250 | 488 L | 75 L to 1 s | 9.8x | 245x | +10L |
B 220 | 488 L | 69 L to 1 s | 8.7x | 245x | +10L |
Vehicle | B 180 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 488 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 50 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 306x |
Difference with world average | +10L |
Vehicle | B 180 CDI |
Trunk space | 488 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 43 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 334x |
Difference with world average | +10L |
Vehicle | B 200 CDI |
Trunk space | 488 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 55 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 272x |
Difference with world average | +10L |
Vehicle | B 200 |
Trunk space | 488 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 61 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 306x |
Difference with world average | +10L |
Vehicle | B 160 CDI |
Trunk space | 488 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 37 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 334x |
Difference with world average | +10L |
Vehicle | B 180 1.8 CDI |
Trunk space | 488 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 48 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 272x |
Difference with world average | +10L |
Vehicle | B 220 CDI |
Trunk space | 488 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 62 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 228x |
Difference with world average | +10L |
Vehicle | B 250 |
Trunk space | 488 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 75 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 245x |
Difference with world average | +10L |
Vehicle | B 220 |
Trunk space | 488 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 69 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 245x |
Difference with world average | +10L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
B 150 | 544 L | 40 L to 1 s | 9.1x | 363x | +66L |
B 170 | 544 L | 48 L to 1 s | 9.1x | 320x | +66L |
B 180 CDI | 544 L | 49 L to 1 s | 9.1x | 273x | +66L |
B 200 | 544 L | 57 L to 1 s | 9.1x | 267x | +66L |
B 200 CDI | 544 L | 60 L to 1 s | 9.1x | 273x | +66L |
B 200 Turbo | 544 L | 78 L to 1 s | 9.1x | 267x | +66L |
Vehicle | B 150 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 544 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 40 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 363x |
Difference with world average | +66L |
Vehicle | B 170 |
Trunk space | 544 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 48 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 320x |
Difference with world average | +66L |
Vehicle | B 180 CDI |
Trunk space | 544 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 49 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 273x |
Difference with world average | +66L |
Vehicle | B 200 |
Trunk space | 544 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 57 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 267x |
Difference with world average | +66L |
Vehicle | B 200 CDI |
Trunk space | 544 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 60 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 273x |
Difference with world average | +66L |
Vehicle | B 200 Turbo |
Trunk space | 544 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 78 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 267x |
Difference with world average | +66L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
B 150 | 544 L | 40 L to 1 s | 9.1x | 363x | +66L |
B 170 | 544 L | 48 L to 1 s | 9.1x | 320x | +66L |
B 180 CDI | 544 L | 49 L to 1 s | 9.1x | 273x | +66L |
B 200 | 544 L | 57 L to 1 s | 9.1x | 267x | +66L |
B 200 CDI | 544 L | 59 L to 1 s | 9.1x | 273x | +66L |
B 200 Turbo | 544 L | 78 L to 1 s | 9.1x | 267x | +66L |
Vehicle | B 150 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 544 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 40 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 363x |
Difference with world average | +66L |
Vehicle | B 170 |
Trunk space | 544 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 48 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 320x |
Difference with world average | +66L |
Vehicle | B 180 CDI |
Trunk space | 544 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 49 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 273x |
Difference with world average | +66L |
Vehicle | B 200 |
Trunk space | 544 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 57 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 267x |
Difference with world average | +66L |
Vehicle | B 200 CDI |
Trunk space | 544 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 59 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 273x |
Difference with world average | +66L |
Vehicle | B 200 Turbo |
Trunk space | 544 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 78 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 267x |
Difference with world average | +66L |