2018 C-class (W205, facelift 2018)
2018 C-class Cabriolet (A205, facelift 2018)
2018 C-class T-mod (S205, facelift 2018)
2018 C-class Coupe (C205, facelift 2018)
2014 C-class T-mod (S205)
2015 C-class Coupe (C205)
2016 C-class Cabriolet (A205)
2014 C-class (W205)
2011 C-class T-mod (S204 facelift 2011)
2011 C-class Coupe (C204 facelift 2011)
2011 C-class (W204 facelift 2011)
2007 C-class T-mod (S204)
2007 C-class (W204)
2000 C-class Sport Coupe (CL203)
2000 C-class (W203)
2001 C-class T-mod (S203)
1996 C-class T-mod (S202)
1993 C-class (W202)
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMG C 43 V6 | 480 L | 107 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 160x | +2L |
C 300 e | 300 L | 59 L to 1 s | 6x | 151x | -178L |
C 300 de | 300 L | 57 L to 1 s | 6x | 154x | -178L |
AMG C 63 V8 | 435 L | 112 L to 1 s | 6.6x | 109x | -43L |
AMG C 63 S V8 | 435 L | 114 L to 1 s | 6.6x | 109x | -43L |
C 300 | 455 L | 84 L to 1 s | 6.9x | 229x | -23L |
C 180 | 455 L | 58 L to 1 s | 11.1x | 285x | -23L |
Vehicle | AMG C 43 V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 480 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 107 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 160x |
Difference with world average | +2L |
Vehicle | C 300 e |
Trunk space | 300 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 59 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 151x |
Difference with world average | -178L |
Vehicle | C 300 de |
Trunk space | 300 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 57 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 154x |
Difference with world average | -178L |
Vehicle | AMG C 63 V8 |
Trunk space | 435 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 112 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 109x |
Difference with world average | -43L |
Vehicle | AMG C 63 S V8 |
Trunk space | 435 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 114 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 109x |
Difference with world average | -43L |
Vehicle | C 300 |
Trunk space | 455 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 84 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 229x |
Difference with world average | -23L |
Vehicle | C 180 |
Trunk space | 455 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 58 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 285x |
Difference with world average | -23L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMG C 43 V6 | 285 L | 62 L to 1 s | 4.3x | 95x | -193L |
AMG C 63 S V8 | 285 L | 73 L to 1 s | 4.3x | 72x | -193L |
AMG C 63 V8 | 285 L | 71 L to 1 s | 4.3x | 72x | -193L |
Vehicle | AMG C 43 V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 285 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 62 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 95x |
Difference with world average | -193L |
Vehicle | AMG C 63 S V8 |
Trunk space | 285 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 73 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 72x |
Difference with world average | -193L |
Vehicle | AMG C 63 V8 |
Trunk space | 285 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 71 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 72x |
Difference with world average | -193L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMG C 43 V6 | 490 L | 107 L to 1 s | 7.4x | 164x | +12L |
AMG C 63 V8 | 460 L | 115 L to 1 s | 7x | 116x | -18L |
AMG C 63 S V8 | 460 L | 118 L to 1 s | 7x | 116x | -18L |
Vehicle | AMG C 43 V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 490 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 107 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 164x |
Difference with world average | +12L |
Vehicle | AMG C 63 V8 |
Trunk space | 460 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 115 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 116x |
Difference with world average | -18L |
Vehicle | AMG C 63 S V8 |
Trunk space | 460 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 118 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 116x |
Difference with world average | -18L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMG C 43 V6 | 400 L | 89 L to 1 s | 6.1x | 134x | -78L |
AMG C 63 V8 | 355 L | 93 L to 1 s | 5.4x | 89x | -123L |
AMG C 63 S V8 | 355 L | 96 L to 1 s | 5.4x | 89x | -123L |
Vehicle | AMG C 43 V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 400 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 89 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 134x |
Difference with world average | -78L |
Vehicle | AMG C 63 V8 |
Trunk space | 355 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 93 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 89x |
Difference with world average | -123L |
Vehicle | AMG C 63 S V8 |
Trunk space | 355 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 96 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 89x |
Difference with world average | -123L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C 180d | 490 L | 43 L to 1 s | 12x | 307x | +12L |
C 200d | 490 L | 49 L to 1 s | 12x | 307x | +12L |
C 220d | 490 L | 69 L to 1 s | 12x | 229x | +12L |
C 180 | 490 L | 60 L to 1 s | 12x | 307x | +12L |
C 200 | 480 L | 67 L to 1 s | 11.7x | 241x | +2L |
AMG C 63 V8 | 490 L | 123 L to 1 s | 7.4x | 123x | +12L |
C 300h | 435 L | 68 L to 1 s | 8.7x | 203x | -43L |
C 250d | 490 L | 74 L to 1 s | 7.4x | 229x | +12L |
C 250 | 490 L | 78 L to 1 s | 7.4x | 246x | +12L |
AMG C 63 S V6 | 490 L | 126 L to 1 s | 7.4x | 123x | +12L |
AMG C 43 V6 | 490 L | 107 L to 1 s | 7.4x | 164x | +12L |
C 300 | 490 L | 84 L to 1 s | 7.4x | 246x | +12L |
C 160 | 490 L | 51 L to 1 s | 12x | 307x | +12L |
C 400 V6 | 480 L | 100 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 160x | +2L |
Vehicle | C 180d |
---|---|
Trunk space | 490 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 43 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 12x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 307x |
Difference with world average | +12L |
Vehicle | C 200d |
Trunk space | 490 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 49 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 12x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 307x |
Difference with world average | +12L |
Vehicle | C 220d |
Trunk space | 490 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 69 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 12x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 229x |
Difference with world average | +12L |
Vehicle | C 180 |
Trunk space | 490 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 60 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 12x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 307x |
Difference with world average | +12L |
Vehicle | C 200 |
Trunk space | 480 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 67 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 241x |
Difference with world average | +2L |
Vehicle | AMG C 63 V8 |
Trunk space | 490 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 123 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 123x |
Difference with world average | +12L |
Vehicle | C 300h |
Trunk space | 435 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 68 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 203x |
Difference with world average | -43L |
Vehicle | C 250d |
Trunk space | 490 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 74 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 229x |
Difference with world average | +12L |
Vehicle | C 250 |
Trunk space | 490 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 78 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 246x |
Difference with world average | +12L |
Vehicle | AMG C 63 S V6 |
Trunk space | 490 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 126 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 123x |
Difference with world average | +12L |
Vehicle | AMG C 43 V6 |
Trunk space | 490 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 107 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 164x |
Difference with world average | +12L |
Vehicle | C 300 |
Trunk space | 490 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 84 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 246x |
Difference with world average | +12L |
Vehicle | C 160 |
Trunk space | 490 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 51 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 12x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 307x |
Difference with world average | +12L |
Vehicle | C 400 V6 |
Trunk space | 480 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 100 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 160x |
Difference with world average | +2L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C 220d | 400 L | 56 L to 1 s | 9.8x | 187x | -78L |
C 180 | 400 L | 48 L to 1 s | 9.8x | 251x | -78L |
C 200 | 400 L | 58 L to 1 s | 8x | 201x | -78L |
C 300 | 400 L | 70 L to 1 s | 6.1x | 201x | -78L |
C 250d | 400 L | 61 L to 1 s | 8x | 187x | -78L |
C 250 | 400 L | 62 L to 1 s | 8x | 201x | -78L |
C 400 | 400 L | 85 L to 1 s | 6.1x | 134x | -78L |
Vehicle | C 220d |
---|---|
Trunk space | 400 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 56 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 187x |
Difference with world average | -78L |
Vehicle | C 180 |
Trunk space | 400 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 48 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 251x |
Difference with world average | -78L |
Vehicle | C 200 |
Trunk space | 400 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 58 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 201x |
Difference with world average | -78L |
Vehicle | C 300 |
Trunk space | 400 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 70 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 201x |
Difference with world average | -78L |
Vehicle | C 250d |
Trunk space | 400 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 61 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 187x |
Difference with world average | -78L |
Vehicle | C 250 |
Trunk space | 400 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 62 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 201x |
Difference with world average | -78L |
Vehicle | C 400 |
Trunk space | 400 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 85 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 134x |
Difference with world average | -78L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C 220d | 285 L | 37 L to 1 s | 7x | 133x | -193L |
C 250d | 285 L | 42 L to 1 s | 5.7x | 133x | -193L |
C 180 | 285 L | 34 L to 1 s | 7x | 179x | -193L |
C 200 | 285 L | 38 L to 1 s | 5.7x | 143x | -193L |
C 250 | 285 L | 43 L to 1 s | 5.7x | 143x | -193L |
C 300 | 285 L | 47 L to 1 s | 4.3x | 143x | -193L |
C 400 | 285 L | 58 L to 1 s | 4.3x | 95x | -193L |
Vehicle | C 220d |
---|---|
Trunk space | 285 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 37 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 133x |
Difference with world average | -193L |
Vehicle | C 250d |
Trunk space | 285 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 42 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 133x |
Difference with world average | -193L |
Vehicle | C 180 |
Trunk space | 285 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 34 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 179x |
Difference with world average | -193L |
Vehicle | C 200 |
Trunk space | 285 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 38 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 143x |
Difference with world average | -193L |
Vehicle | C 250 |
Trunk space | 285 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 43 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 143x |
Difference with world average | -193L |
Vehicle | C 300 |
Trunk space | 285 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 47 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 143x |
Difference with world average | -193L |
Vehicle | C 400 |
Trunk space | 285 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 58 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 95x |
Difference with world average | -193L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C 200d | 480 L | 49 L to 1 s | 11.7x | 300x | +2L |
C 180d | 480 L | 44 L to 1 s | 11.7x | 300x | +2L |
C 250d | 480 L | 76 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 224x | +2L |
AMG C 63 V8 | 435 L | 112 L to 1 s | 6.6x | 109x | -43L |
C 220d | 480 L | 65 L to 1 s | 11.7x | 224x | +2L |
C 300h | 435 L | 71 L to 1 s | 8.7x | 203x | -43L |
C 250 | 480 L | 77 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 241x | +2L |
C 400 V6 | 480 L | 98 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 160x | +2L |
AMG C 63 S V8 | 435 L | 114 L to 1 s | 6.6x | 109x | -43L |
C 300 | 480 L | 86 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 241x | +2L |
C 200 | 480 L | 70 L to 1 s | 11.7x | 241x | +2L |
C 160 | 480 L | 53 L to 1 s | 11.7x | 301x | +2L |
C 350e | 335 L | 60 L to 1 s | 6.7x | 168x | -143L |
C 180 | 480 L | 59 L to 1 s | 11.7x | 301x | +2L |
C 400 | 480 L | 98 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 160x | +2L |
Vehicle | C 200d |
---|---|
Trunk space | 480 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 49 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 300x |
Difference with world average | +2L |
Vehicle | C 180d |
Trunk space | 480 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 44 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 300x |
Difference with world average | +2L |
Vehicle | C 250d |
Trunk space | 480 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 76 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 224x |
Difference with world average | +2L |
Vehicle | AMG C 63 V8 |
Trunk space | 435 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 112 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 109x |
Difference with world average | -43L |
Vehicle | C 220d |
Trunk space | 480 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 65 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 224x |
Difference with world average | +2L |
Vehicle | C 300h |
Trunk space | 435 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 71 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 203x |
Difference with world average | -43L |
Vehicle | C 250 |
Trunk space | 480 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 77 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 241x |
Difference with world average | +2L |
Vehicle | C 400 V6 |
Trunk space | 480 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 98 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 160x |
Difference with world average | +2L |
Vehicle | AMG C 63 S V8 |
Trunk space | 435 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 114 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 109x |
Difference with world average | -43L |
Vehicle | C 300 |
Trunk space | 480 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 86 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 241x |
Difference with world average | +2L |
Vehicle | C 200 |
Trunk space | 480 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 70 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 241x |
Difference with world average | +2L |
Vehicle | C 160 |
Trunk space | 480 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 53 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 301x |
Difference with world average | +2L |
Vehicle | C 350e |
Trunk space | 335 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 60 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 168x |
Difference with world average | -143L |
Vehicle | C 180 |
Trunk space | 480 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 59 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 301x |
Difference with world average | +2L |
Vehicle | C 400 |
Trunk space | 480 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 98 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 160x |
Difference with world average | +2L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C 180 CDI | 485 L | 47 L to 1 s | 8.2x | 226x | +7L |
C 250 CDI | 485 L | 69 L to 1 s | 8.2x | 226x | +7L |
C 200 CDI | 485 L | 54 L to 1 s | 8.2x | 226x | +7L |
C 220 CDI | 485 L | 61 L to 1 s | 8.2x | 226x | +7L |
C 180 | 485 L | 58 L to 1 s | 8.2x | 304x | +7L |
C 250 | 485 L | 69 L to 1 s | 8.2x | 270x | +7L |
C 350 | 485 L | 84 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 139x | +7L |
C 200 | 485 L | 63 L to 1 s | 8.2x | 270x | +7L |
C 300 CDI | 485 L | 78 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 162x | +7L |
C 350 CDI | 485 L | 81 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 162x | +7L |
Vehicle | C 180 CDI |
---|---|
Trunk space | 485 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 47 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 226x |
Difference with world average | +7L |
Vehicle | C 250 CDI |
Trunk space | 485 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 69 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 226x |
Difference with world average | +7L |
Vehicle | C 200 CDI |
Trunk space | 485 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 54 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 226x |
Difference with world average | +7L |
Vehicle | C 220 CDI |
Trunk space | 485 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 61 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 226x |
Difference with world average | +7L |
Vehicle | C 180 |
Trunk space | 485 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 58 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 304x |
Difference with world average | +7L |
Vehicle | C 250 |
Trunk space | 485 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 69 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 270x |
Difference with world average | +7L |
Vehicle | C 350 |
Trunk space | 485 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 84 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 139x |
Difference with world average | +7L |
Vehicle | C 200 |
Trunk space | 485 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 63 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 270x |
Difference with world average | +7L |
Vehicle | C 300 CDI |
Trunk space | 485 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 78 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 162x |
Difference with world average | +7L |
Vehicle | C 350 CDI |
Trunk space | 485 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 81 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 162x |
Difference with world average | +7L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C 250 CDI | 450 L | 67 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 210x | -28L |
C 220 CDI | 450 L | 58 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 210x | -28L |
C 250 | 450 L | 66 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 251x | -28L |
C 180 | 450 L | 56 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 282x | -28L |
C 350 | 450 L | 79 L to 1 s | 6.8x | 129x | -28L |
AMG C 63 | 450 L | 107 L to 1 s | 6.8x | 72x | -28L |
C 200 | 450 L | 61 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 251x | -28L |
Vehicle | C 250 CDI |
---|---|
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 67 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 210x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | C 220 CDI |
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 58 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 210x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | C 250 |
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 66 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 251x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | C 180 |
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 56 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 282x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | C 350 |
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 79 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 129x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | AMG C 63 |
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 107 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 72x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | C 200 |
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 61 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 251x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C 180 | 475 L | 59 L to 1 s | 8.1x | 298x | -3L |
C 200 | 475 L | 61 L to 1 s | 8.1x | 264x | -3L |
C 250 CDI | 475 L | 71 L to 1 s | 8.1x | 222x | -3L |
C 220 CDI | 475 L | 59 L to 1 s | 8.1x | 222x | -3L |
C 200 CDI | 475 L | 55 L to 1 s | 8.1x | 222x | -3L |
C 180 CDI | 475 L | 48 L to 1 s | 8.1x | 222x | -3L |
C 250 CDI 4MATIC | 475 L | 71 L to 1 s | 8.1x | 222x | -3L |
C 250 | 475 L | 70 L to 1 s | 8.1x | 264x | -3L |
C 350 | 475 L | 83 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 136x | -3L |
C 350 4MATIC | 475 L | 83 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 136x | -3L |
Vehicle | C 180 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 475 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 59 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 298x |
Difference with world average | -3L |
Vehicle | C 200 |
Trunk space | 475 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 61 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 264x |
Difference with world average | -3L |
Vehicle | C 250 CDI |
Trunk space | 475 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 71 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 222x |
Difference with world average | -3L |
Vehicle | C 220 CDI |
Trunk space | 475 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 59 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 222x |
Difference with world average | -3L |
Vehicle | C 200 CDI |
Trunk space | 475 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 55 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 222x |
Difference with world average | -3L |
Vehicle | C 180 CDI |
Trunk space | 475 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 48 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 222x |
Difference with world average | -3L |
Vehicle | C 250 CDI 4MATIC |
Trunk space | 475 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 71 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 222x |
Difference with world average | -3L |
Vehicle | C 250 |
Trunk space | 475 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 70 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 264x |
Difference with world average | -3L |
Vehicle | C 350 |
Trunk space | 475 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 83 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 136x |
Difference with world average | -3L |
Vehicle | C 350 4MATIC |
Trunk space | 475 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 83 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 136x |
Difference with world average | -3L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C 180 K | 485 L | 52 L to 1 s | 7.8x | - | +7L |
C 200 CDI | 485 L | 48 L to 1 s | 7.8x | 226x | +7L |
C 200 CDI | 485 L | 47 L to 1 s | 7.8x | 226x | +7L |
C 200 K | 485 L | 58 L to 1 s | 7.8x | 270x | +7L |
C 220 CDI | 485 L | 57 L to 1 s | 7.8x | - | +7L |
C 230 T-Model | 485 L | 59 L to 1 s | 7.8x | - | +7L |
C 230 | 485 L | 57 L to 1 s | 7.8x | 194x | +7L |
C 320 CDI | 485 L | 72 L to 1 s | 7.8x | 162x | +7L |
C 350 | 485 L | 78 L to 1 s | 7.8x | 139x | +7L |
AMG C 63 | 450 L | 102 L to 1 s | - | 72x | -28L |
Vehicle | C 180 K |
---|---|
Trunk space | 485 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 52 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | - |
Difference with world average | +7L |
Vehicle | C 200 CDI |
Trunk space | 485 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 48 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 226x |
Difference with world average | +7L |
Vehicle | C 200 CDI |
Trunk space | 485 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 47 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 226x |
Difference with world average | +7L |
Vehicle | C 200 K |
Trunk space | 485 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 58 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 270x |
Difference with world average | +7L |
Vehicle | C 220 CDI |
Trunk space | 485 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 57 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | - |
Difference with world average | +7L |
Vehicle | C 230 T-Model |
Trunk space | 485 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 59 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | - |
Difference with world average | +7L |
Vehicle | C 230 |
Trunk space | 485 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 57 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 194x |
Difference with world average | +7L |
Vehicle | C 320 CDI |
Trunk space | 485 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 72 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 162x |
Difference with world average | +7L |
Vehicle | C 350 |
Trunk space | 485 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 78 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 139x |
Difference with world average | +7L |
Vehicle | AMG C 63 |
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 102 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | - |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 72x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C 180 Kompressor | 475 L | 51 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 264x | -3L |
C 200 | 475 L | 57 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 264x | -3L |
C 200 Kompressor | 475 L | 58 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 264x | -3L |
C 200 CDI | 475 L | 48 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 221x | -3L |
C 230 | 475 L | 59 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 190x | -3L |
C 220 CDI | 475 L | 66 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 221x | -3L |
C 280 | 475 L | 69 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 159x | -3L |
C 280 4Matic | 475 L | 69 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 159x | -3L |
C 320 CDI | 475 L | 65 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 159x | -3L |
C 350 | 475 L | 78 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 136x | -3L |
C 350 4Matic | 475 L | 78 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 136x | -3L |
AMG C 63 | 475 L | 110 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 77x | -3L |
Vehicle | C 180 Kompressor |
---|---|
Trunk space | 475 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 51 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 264x |
Difference with world average | -3L |
Vehicle | C 200 |
Trunk space | 475 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 57 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 264x |
Difference with world average | -3L |
Vehicle | C 200 Kompressor |
Trunk space | 475 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 58 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 264x |
Difference with world average | -3L |
Vehicle | C 200 CDI |
Trunk space | 475 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 48 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 221x |
Difference with world average | -3L |
Vehicle | C 230 |
Trunk space | 475 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 59 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 190x |
Difference with world average | -3L |
Vehicle | C 220 CDI |
Trunk space | 475 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 66 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 221x |
Difference with world average | -3L |
Vehicle | C 280 |
Trunk space | 475 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 69 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 159x |
Difference with world average | -3L |
Vehicle | C 280 4Matic |
Trunk space | 475 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 69 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 159x |
Difference with world average | -3L |
Vehicle | C 320 CDI |
Trunk space | 475 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 65 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 159x |
Difference with world average | -3L |
Vehicle | C 350 |
Trunk space | 475 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 78 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 136x |
Difference with world average | -3L |
Vehicle | C 350 4Matic |
Trunk space | 475 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 78 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 136x |
Difference with world average | -3L |
Vehicle | AMG C 63 |
Trunk space | 475 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 110 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 77x |
Difference with world average | -3L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C 180K | 310 L | 33 L to 1 s | 5x | 173x | -168L |
C 180 | 310 L | 30 L to 1 s | 5x | 155x | -168L |
C 200 | 310 L | 35 L to 1 s | 5x | 155x | -168L |
C 200 CDI | 310 L | 27 L to 1 s | 5x | 144x | -168L |
C 200 CGI | 310 L | 36 L to 1 s | 5x | 173x | -168L |
C 220 CDI | 310 L | 31 L to 1 s | 5x | 144x | -168L |
C 200 Kompressor | 310 L | 33 L to 1 s | 5x | 155x | -168L |
AMG C 30 CDI | 310 L | 48 L to 1 s | 5x | 105x | -168L |
C 230 | 310 L | 36 L to 1 s | 5x | 124x | -168L |
C 230 Kompressor | 310 L | 40 L to 1 s | 5x | 173x | -168L |
AMG C 32 | 310 L | 63 L to 1 s | 5x | - | -168L |
C 350 | 310 L | 51 L to 1 s | 5x | 89x | -168L |
C 320 | 310 L | 42 L to 1 s | 5x | 97x | -168L |
C 160 | 310 L | 29 L to 1 s | 5x | 173x | -168L |
Vehicle | C 180K |
---|---|
Trunk space | 310 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 33 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 173x |
Difference with world average | -168L |
Vehicle | C 180 |
Trunk space | 310 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 30 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 155x |
Difference with world average | -168L |
Vehicle | C 200 |
Trunk space | 310 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 35 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 155x |
Difference with world average | -168L |
Vehicle | C 200 CDI |
Trunk space | 310 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 27 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 144x |
Difference with world average | -168L |
Vehicle | C 200 CGI |
Trunk space | 310 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 36 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 173x |
Difference with world average | -168L |
Vehicle | C 220 CDI |
Trunk space | 310 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 31 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 144x |
Difference with world average | -168L |
Vehicle | C 200 Kompressor |
Trunk space | 310 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 33 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 155x |
Difference with world average | -168L |
Vehicle | AMG C 30 CDI |
Trunk space | 310 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 48 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 105x |
Difference with world average | -168L |
Vehicle | C 230 |
Trunk space | 310 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 36 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 124x |
Difference with world average | -168L |
Vehicle | C 230 Kompressor |
Trunk space | 310 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 40 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 173x |
Difference with world average | -168L |
Vehicle | AMG C 32 |
Trunk space | 310 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 63 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | - |
Difference with world average | -168L |
Vehicle | C 350 |
Trunk space | 310 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 51 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 89x |
Difference with world average | -168L |
Vehicle | C 320 |
Trunk space | 310 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 42 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 97x |
Difference with world average | -168L |
Vehicle | C 160 |
Trunk space | 310 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 29 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 173x |
Difference with world average | -168L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C 180 | 455 L | 43 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 228x | -23L |
C 180K | 455 L | 48 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 253x | -23L |
C 200 Kompressor | 455 L | 51 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 253x | -23L |
C 200 CDI | 455 L | 40 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 212x | -23L |
C 200 CGI | 455 L | 53 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 253x | -23L |
C 220 CDI | 455 L | 46 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 212x | -23L |
C 230 | 455 L | 58 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 182x | -23L |
C 230 Kompressor | 455 L | 59 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 253x | -23L |
C 240 | 455 L | 51 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 175x | -23L |
C 280 | 455 L | 66 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 152x | -23L |
C 240 4Matic | 455 L | 48 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 175x | -23L |
C 280 4Matic | 455 L | 63 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 152x | -23L |
C 270 CDI | 455 L | 54 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 169x | -23L |
AMG C 30 CDI | 455 L | 70 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 154x | -23L |
AMG C 32 | 455 L | 93 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 142x | -23L |
C 320 CDI | 455 L | 67 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 152x | -23L |
C 320 | 455 L | 68 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 142x | -23L |
C 350 | 455 L | 75 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 130x | -23L |
C 55 | 455 L | 93 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 84x | -23L |
C 320 4Matic | 455 L | 60 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 142x | -23L |
C200 CDI | 455 L | 40 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 212x | -23L |
C 350 4Matic | 455 L | 69 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 130x | -23L |
Vehicle | C 180 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 455 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 43 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 228x |
Difference with world average | -23L |
Vehicle | C 180K |
Trunk space | 455 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 48 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 253x |
Difference with world average | -23L |
Vehicle | C 200 Kompressor |
Trunk space | 455 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 51 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 253x |
Difference with world average | -23L |
Vehicle | C 200 CDI |
Trunk space | 455 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 40 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 212x |
Difference with world average | -23L |
Vehicle | C 200 CGI |
Trunk space | 455 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 53 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 253x |
Difference with world average | -23L |
Vehicle | C 220 CDI |
Trunk space | 455 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 46 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 212x |
Difference with world average | -23L |
Vehicle | C 230 |
Trunk space | 455 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 58 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 182x |
Difference with world average | -23L |
Vehicle | C 230 Kompressor |
Trunk space | 455 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 59 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 253x |
Difference with world average | -23L |
Vehicle | C 240 |
Trunk space | 455 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 51 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 175x |
Difference with world average | -23L |
Vehicle | C 280 |
Trunk space | 455 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 66 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 152x |
Difference with world average | -23L |
Vehicle | C 240 4Matic |
Trunk space | 455 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 48 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 175x |
Difference with world average | -23L |
Vehicle | C 280 4Matic |
Trunk space | 455 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 63 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 152x |
Difference with world average | -23L |
Vehicle | C 270 CDI |
Trunk space | 455 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 54 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 169x |
Difference with world average | -23L |
Vehicle | AMG C 30 CDI |
Trunk space | 455 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 70 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 154x |
Difference with world average | -23L |
Vehicle | AMG C 32 |
Trunk space | 455 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 93 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 142x |
Difference with world average | -23L |
Vehicle | C 320 CDI |
Trunk space | 455 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 67 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 152x |
Difference with world average | -23L |
Vehicle | C 320 |
Trunk space | 455 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 68 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 142x |
Difference with world average | -23L |
Vehicle | C 350 |
Trunk space | 455 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 75 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 130x |
Difference with world average | -23L |
Vehicle | C 55 |
Trunk space | 455 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 93 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 84x |
Difference with world average | -23L |
Vehicle | C 320 4Matic |
Trunk space | 455 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 60 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 142x |
Difference with world average | -23L |
Vehicle | C200 CDI |
Trunk space | 455 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 40 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 212x |
Difference with world average | -23L |
Vehicle | C 350 4Matic |
Trunk space | 455 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 69 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 130x |
Difference with world average | -23L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C 180K | 470 L | 49 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 262x | -8L |
C 200 T | 470 L | 52 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 235x | -8L |
C 180 T | 470 L | 44 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 235x | -8L |
C 200 CDI T | 470 L | 39 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 219x | -8L |
C 200 CGI | 470 L | 53 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 262x | -8L |
C 200 CDI | 470 L | 41 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 219x | -8L |
C 220 CDI | 470 L | 47 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 219x | -8L |
C 230 Kompressor | 470 L | 57 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 262x | -8L |
C 220 CDI T | 470 L | 46 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 219x | -8L |
C 230 T | 470 L | 59 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 188x | -8L |
C 240 | 470 L | 52 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 181x | -8L |
C 280 T | 470 L | 63 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 157x | -8L |
C 270 CDI T | 470 L | 53 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 175x | -8L |
C 240 4Matic | 470 L | 47 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 181x | -8L |
C 240 T | 470 L | 52 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 181x | -8L |
AMG C 30 CDI | 470 L | 70 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 159x | -8L |
AMG C 32 | 470 L | 92 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 147x | -8L |
C 320 4Matic | 470 L | 59 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 147x | -8L |
C 320 T CDI | 470 L | 59 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 157x | -8L |
C 350 T 4Matic | 470 L | 70 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 134x | -8L |
C 320 T | 470 L | 61 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 147x | -8L |
C 55 T | 470 L | 92 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 86x | -8L |
C 350 T | 470 L | 76 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 134x | -8L |
Vehicle | C 180K |
---|---|
Trunk space | 470 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 49 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 262x |
Difference with world average | -8L |
Vehicle | C 200 T |
Trunk space | 470 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 52 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 235x |
Difference with world average | -8L |
Vehicle | C 180 T |
Trunk space | 470 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 44 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 235x |
Difference with world average | -8L |
Vehicle | C 200 CDI T |
Trunk space | 470 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 39 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 219x |
Difference with world average | -8L |
Vehicle | C 200 CGI |
Trunk space | 470 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 53 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 262x |
Difference with world average | -8L |
Vehicle | C 200 CDI |
Trunk space | 470 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 41 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 219x |
Difference with world average | -8L |
Vehicle | C 220 CDI |
Trunk space | 470 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 47 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 219x |
Difference with world average | -8L |
Vehicle | C 230 Kompressor |
Trunk space | 470 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 57 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 262x |
Difference with world average | -8L |
Vehicle | C 220 CDI T |
Trunk space | 470 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 46 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 219x |
Difference with world average | -8L |
Vehicle | C 230 T |
Trunk space | 470 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 59 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 188x |
Difference with world average | -8L |
Vehicle | C 240 |
Trunk space | 470 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 52 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 181x |
Difference with world average | -8L |
Vehicle | C 280 T |
Trunk space | 470 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 63 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 157x |
Difference with world average | -8L |
Vehicle | C 270 CDI T |
Trunk space | 470 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 53 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 175x |
Difference with world average | -8L |
Vehicle | C 240 4Matic |
Trunk space | 470 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 47 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 181x |
Difference with world average | -8L |
Vehicle | C 240 T |
Trunk space | 470 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 52 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 181x |
Difference with world average | -8L |
Vehicle | AMG C 30 CDI |
Trunk space | 470 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 70 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 159x |
Difference with world average | -8L |
Vehicle | AMG C 32 |
Trunk space | 470 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 92 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 147x |
Difference with world average | -8L |
Vehicle | C 320 4Matic |
Trunk space | 470 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 59 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 147x |
Difference with world average | -8L |
Vehicle | C 320 T CDI |
Trunk space | 470 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 59 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 157x |
Difference with world average | -8L |
Vehicle | C 350 T 4Matic |
Trunk space | 470 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 70 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 134x |
Difference with world average | -8L |
Vehicle | C 320 T |
Trunk space | 470 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 61 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 147x |
Difference with world average | -8L |
Vehicle | C 55 T |
Trunk space | 470 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 92 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 86x |
Difference with world average | -8L |
Vehicle | C 350 T |
Trunk space | 470 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 76 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 134x |
Difference with world average | -8L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C 200 T | 465 L | 40 L to 1 s | 7.5x | 233x | -13L |
C 180 T | 465 L | 37 L to 1 s | 7.5x | 258x | -13L |
C 200 T 2.0 | 465 L | 61 L to 1 s | 7.5x | 233x | -13L |
C 200 T CDI | 465 L | 38 L to 1 s | 7.5x | 216x | -13L |
C 220 T CDI | 465 L | 45 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 216x | -13L |
C 220 T D | 465 L | 29 L to 1 s | 7.5x | 216x | -13L |
C 230 T | 465 L | 47 L to 1 s | 7.5x | 211x | -13L |
C 240 T | 465 L | 54 L to 1 s | 7.5x | 194x | -13L |
C 250 T Turbo-D | 465 L | 47 L to 1 s | 7.5x | 186x | -13L |
C 230 T Kompressor | 465 L | 57 L to 1 s | 7.5x | 203x | -13L |
AMG C 43 | 465 L | 75 L to 1 s | 7.5x | 109x | -13L |
C 280 T | 465 L | 56 L to 1 s | 7.5x | 166x | -13L |
Vehicle | C 200 T |
---|---|
Trunk space | 465 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 40 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 233x |
Difference with world average | -13L |
Vehicle | C 180 T |
Trunk space | 465 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 37 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 258x |
Difference with world average | -13L |
Vehicle | C 200 T 2.0 |
Trunk space | 465 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 61 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 233x |
Difference with world average | -13L |
Vehicle | C 200 T CDI |
Trunk space | 465 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 38 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 216x |
Difference with world average | -13L |
Vehicle | C 220 T CDI |
Trunk space | 465 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 45 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 216x |
Difference with world average | -13L |
Vehicle | C 220 T D |
Trunk space | 465 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 29 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 216x |
Difference with world average | -13L |
Vehicle | C 230 T |
Trunk space | 465 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 47 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 211x |
Difference with world average | -13L |
Vehicle | C 240 T |
Trunk space | 465 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 54 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 194x |
Difference with world average | -13L |
Vehicle | C 250 T Turbo-D |
Trunk space | 465 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 47 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 186x |
Difference with world average | -13L |
Vehicle | C 230 T Kompressor |
Trunk space | 465 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 57 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 203x |
Difference with world average | -13L |
Vehicle | AMG C 43 |
Trunk space | 465 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 75 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 109x |
Difference with world average | -13L |
Vehicle | C 280 T |
Trunk space | 465 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 56 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 166x |
Difference with world average | -13L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C 180 | 430 L | 35 L to 1 s | 6.9x | 239x | -48L |
C 200 | 430 L | 41 L to 1 s | 6.9x | 215x | -48L |
C 200 D | 430 L | 25 L to 1 s | 6.9x | 215x | -48L |
C 220 | 430 L | 43 L to 1 s | 6.9x | 196x | -48L |
C 220 D | 430 L | 28 L to 1 s | 6.9x | 200x | -48L |
C 220 CDI | 430 L | 42 L to 1 s | 6.9x | 200x | -48L |
C 230 Kompressor | 430 L | 54 L to 1 s | 6.9x | 187x | -48L |
C 250 Turbo-D | 430 L | 46 L to 1 s | 6.9x | 172x | -48L |
C 280 | 430 L | 50 L to 1 s | 6.9x | 154x | -48L |
C 240 | 430 L | 46 L to 1 s | 6.9x | 179x | -48L |
C 250 D | 430 L | 30 L to 1 s | 6.9x | 172x | -48L |
AMG C 36 | 430 L | 67 L to 1 s | 6.9x | 119x | -48L |
AMG C 43 | 465 L | 75 L to 1 s | 7.5x | 109x | -13L |
Vehicle | C 180 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 430 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 35 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 239x |
Difference with world average | -48L |
Vehicle | C 200 |
Trunk space | 430 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 41 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 215x |
Difference with world average | -48L |
Vehicle | C 200 D |
Trunk space | 430 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 25 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 215x |
Difference with world average | -48L |
Vehicle | C 220 |
Trunk space | 430 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 43 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 196x |
Difference with world average | -48L |
Vehicle | C 220 D |
Trunk space | 430 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 28 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 200x |
Difference with world average | -48L |
Vehicle | C 220 CDI |
Trunk space | 430 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 42 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 200x |
Difference with world average | -48L |
Vehicle | C 230 Kompressor |
Trunk space | 430 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 54 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 187x |
Difference with world average | -48L |
Vehicle | C 250 Turbo-D |
Trunk space | 430 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 46 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 172x |
Difference with world average | -48L |
Vehicle | C 280 |
Trunk space | 430 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 50 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 154x |
Difference with world average | -48L |
Vehicle | C 240 |
Trunk space | 430 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 46 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 179x |
Difference with world average | -48L |
Vehicle | C 250 D |
Trunk space | 430 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 30 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 172x |
Difference with world average | -48L |
Vehicle | AMG C 36 |
Trunk space | 430 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 67 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 119x |
Difference with world average | -48L |
Vehicle | AMG C 43 |
Trunk space | 465 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 75 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 109x |
Difference with world average | -13L |