cat_logo
HomeMercedes-benz

E-class

Mercedes-Benz E-class Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Choose Generation

Quick notes on Mercedes-Benz E-class trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 425 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 9.4 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 4.3 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 106.3 L
    • Max trunk load: 106 kg
    • Interior transformation: none
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 1.4 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 0.8 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • E 300 : 1.6 L/hp (2.2 L/kW)
  • E 200 : 2.2 L/hp (2.9 L/kW)
  • E 220d : 2.2 L/hp (3 L/kW)
  • E 400 : 1.3 L/hp (1.7 L/kW)
  • E 350d : 1.6 L/hp (2.2 L/kW)
  • E 400d : 1.3 L/hp (1.7 L/kW)
  • AMG E 53 : 1 L/hp (1.3 L/kW)
  • E 450 V6 : 1.2 L/hp (1.6 L/kW)
  • E 350 d : 1.5 L/hp (2 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • E 300 : 1.7 L/km-h (1.06 L/mph)
  • E 200 : 1.84 L/km-h (1.14 L/mph)
  • E 220d : 1.78 L/km-h (1.11 L/mph)
  • E 400 : 1.7 L/km-h (1.06 L/mph)
  • E 350d : 1.7 L/km-h (1.06 L/mph)
  • E 400d : 1.7 L/km-h (1.06 L/mph)
  • AMG E 53 : 1.7 L/km-h (1.06 L/mph)
  • E 450 V6 : 1.7 L/km-h (1.06 L/mph)
  • E 350 d : 1.7 L/km-h (1.06 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • E 300 : 66.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 200 : 62.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 220d : 88.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 400 : 50.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 350d : 67.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 400d : 85x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • AMG E 53 : 59x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 450 V6 : 49.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 350 d : 78.7x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    E 300 425 L 70 L to 1 s 6.4x 213x -53L
    E 200 425 L 58 L to 1 s 8.5x 213x -53L
    E 220d 425 L 59 L to 1 s 8.5x 218x -53L
    E 400 425 L 85 L to 1 s 6.4x 142x -53L
    E 350d 425 L 75 L to 1 s 8.5x 142x -53L
    E 400d 425 L 89 L to 1 s 6.4x 145x -53L
    AMG E 53 425 L 101 L to 1 s 6.4x 142x -53L
    E 450 V6 425 L 89 L to 1 s 6.4x 142x -53L
    E 350 d 425 L 76 L to 1 s 8.5x 145x -53L
    Vehicle E 300
    Trunk space 425 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 70 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 213x
    Difference with world average -53L
    Vehicle E 200
    Trunk space 425 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 58 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 213x
    Difference with world average -53L
    Vehicle E 220d
    Trunk space 425 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 59 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 218x
    Difference with world average -53L
    Vehicle E 400
    Trunk space 425 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 85 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 142x
    Difference with world average -53L
    Vehicle E 350d
    Trunk space 425 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 75 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 142x
    Difference with world average -53L
    Vehicle E 400d
    Trunk space 425 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 89 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 145x
    Difference with world average -53L
    Vehicle AMG E 53
    Trunk space 425 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 101 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 142x
    Difference with world average -53L
    Vehicle E 450 V6
    Trunk space 425 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 89 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 142x
    Difference with world average -53L
    Vehicle E 350 d
    Trunk space 425 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 76 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 145x
    Difference with world average -53L

    Quick notes on Mercedes-Benz E-class trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 534 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 11.9 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 5.3 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 106.8 L
      • Max trunk load: 103 kg
      • Interior transformation: limited
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 1.8 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.1 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • E 200 : 2.9 L/hp (4 L/kW)
  • E 350d V6 : 2.1 L/hp (2.8 L/kW)
  • E 220d : 2.8 L/hp (3.8 L/kW)
  • E 250 : 2.6 L/hp (3.5 L/kW)
  • E 200d : 3.6 L/hp (4.9 L/kW)
  • E 300 : 2.1 L/hp (2.8 L/kW)
  • E 350e : 2.1 L/hp (2.9 L/kW)
  • AMG E 63 V8 : 0.9 L/hp (1.3 L/kW)
  • E 400 V6 : 1.6 L/hp (2.2 L/kW)
  • AMG E 63 S V8 : 0.9 L/hp (1.2 L/kW)
  • AMG E 53 : 1.2 L/hp (1.7 L/kW)
  • E 300 d : 2.2 L/hp (3 L/kW)
  • E 350d : 1.9 L/hp (2.6 L/kW)
  • E 350 : 2.5 L/hp (3.3 L/kW)
  • E 450 V6 : 1.5 L/hp (2 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • E 200 : 2.25 L/km-h (1.4 L/mph)
  • E 350d V6 : 2.16 L/km-h (1.34 L/mph)
  • E 220d : 2.26 L/km-h (1.4 L/mph)
  • E 250 : 2.16 L/km-h (1.34 L/mph)
  • E 200d : 2.41 L/km-h (1.5 L/mph)
  • E 300 : 2.16 L/km-h (1.34 L/mph)
  • E 350e : 1.8 L/km-h (1.12 L/mph)
  • AMG E 63 V8 : 2.16 L/km-h (1.34 L/mph)
  • E 400 V6 : 2.16 L/km-h (1.34 L/mph)
  • AMG E 63 S V8 : 2.16 L/km-h (1.34 L/mph)
  • AMG E 53 : 2.16 L/km-h (1.34 L/mph)
  • E 300 d : 2.16 L/km-h (1.34 L/mph)
  • E 350d : 2.16 L/km-h (1.34 L/mph)
  • E 350 : 2.16 L/km-h (1.34 L/mph)
  • E 450 V6 : 2.16 L/km-h (1.34 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • E 200 : 88.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 350d V6 : 90x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 220d : 120x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 250 : 91.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 200d : 138.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 300 : 88.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 350e : 214.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • AMG E 63 V8 : 61.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 400 V6 : 71.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • AMG E 63 S V8 : 61.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • AMG E 53 : 62.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 300 d : 110.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 350d : 103.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 350 : 81.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 450 V6 : 64.3x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    E 200 540 L 70 L to 1 s 10.8x 271x +62L
    E 350d V6 540 L 96 L to 1 s 10.8x 181x +62L
    E 220d 540 L 76 L to 1 s 10.8x 277x +62L
    E 250 540 L 82 L to 1 s 10.8x 271x +62L
    E 200d 540 L 68 L to 1 s 10.8x 277x +62L
    E 300 540 L 90 L to 1 s 8.2x 271x +62L
    E 350e 450 L 76 L to 1 s 9x 226x -28L
    AMG E 63 V8 540 L 164 L to 1 s 8.2x 136x +62L
    E 400 V6 540 L 110 L to 1 s 8.2x 154x +62L
    AMG E 63 S V8 540 L 169 L to 1 s 8.2x 136x +62L
    AMG E 53 540 L 126 L to 1 s 8.2x 180x +62L
    E 300 d 540 L 92 L to 1 s 10.8x 277x +62L
    E 350d 540 L 100 L to 1 s 10.8x 185x +62L
    E 350 540 L 96 L to 1 s 8.2x 271x +62L
    E 450 V6 540 L 102 L to 1 s 8.2x 180x +62L
    Vehicle E 200
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 70 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 10.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 271x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 350d V6
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 96 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 10.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 181x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 220d
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 76 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 10.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 277x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 250
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 82 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 10.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 271x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 200d
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 68 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 10.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 277x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 300
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 90 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 271x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 350e
    Trunk space 450 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 76 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 226x
    Difference with world average -28L
    Vehicle AMG E 63 V8
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 164 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 136x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 400 V6
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 110 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 154x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle AMG E 63 S V8
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 169 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 136x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle AMG E 53
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 126 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 180x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 300 d
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 92 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 10.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 277x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 350d
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 100 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 10.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 185x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 350
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 96 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 271x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 450 V6
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 102 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 180x
    Difference with world average +62L

    Quick notes on Mercedes-Benz E-class trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 323 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 7.2 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 3.2 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 80.8 L
      • Max trunk load: 113 kg
      • Interior transformation: none
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 1.1 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 0.7 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • E 300 : 1.1 L/hp (1.5 L/kW)
  • E 220d : 1.6 L/hp (2.2 L/kW)
  • E 200 : 1.4 L/hp (2 L/kW)
  • E 400 : 0.9 L/hp (1.3 L/kW)
  • E 350d : 1.1 L/hp (1.5 L/kW)
  • E 400d : 1.1 L/hp (1.5 L/kW)
  • AMG E 53 : 0.9 L/hp (1.2 L/kW)
  • E 450 V6 : 0.9 L/hp (1.2 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • E 300 : 1.14 L/km-h (0.71 L/mph)
  • E 220d : 1.31 L/km-h (0.81 L/mph)
  • E 200 : 1.24 L/km-h (0.77 L/mph)
  • E 400 : 1.24 L/km-h (0.77 L/mph)
  • E 350d : 1.24 L/km-h (0.77 L/mph)
  • E 400d : 1.54 L/km-h (0.96 L/mph)
  • AMG E 53 : 1.54 L/km-h (0.96 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • E 300 : 43.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 220d : 72.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 200 : 40.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 400 : 37.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 350d : 58.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 400d : 74x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • AMG E 53 : 52.7x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    E 300 285 L 45 L to 1 s 4.3x 143x -193L
    E 220d 310 L 42 L to 1 s 6.2x 159x -168L
    E 200 285 L 38 L to 1 s 5.7x 143x -193L
    E 400 310 L 60 L to 1 s 4.7x 103x -168L
    E 350d 310 L 54 L to 1 s 6.2x 106x -168L
    E 400d 385 L 79 L to 1 s 5.8x 132x -93L
    AMG E 53 385 L 90 L to 1 s 5.8x 128x -93L
    E 450 V6 310 L - 4.7x 103x -168L
    Vehicle E 300
    Trunk space 285 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 45 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 143x
    Difference with world average -193L
    Vehicle E 220d
    Trunk space 310 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 42 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 159x
    Difference with world average -168L
    Vehicle E 200
    Trunk space 285 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 38 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 143x
    Difference with world average -193L
    Vehicle E 400
    Trunk space 310 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 60 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 103x
    Difference with world average -168L
    Vehicle E 350d
    Trunk space 310 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 54 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 106x
    Difference with world average -168L
    Vehicle E 400d
    Trunk space 385 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 79 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 132x
    Difference with world average -93L
    Vehicle AMG E 53
    Trunk space 385 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 90 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 128x
    Difference with world average -93L
    Vehicle E 450 V6
    Trunk space 310 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 4.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 103x
    Difference with world average -168L

    Quick notes on Mercedes-Benz E-class trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 640 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 14.2 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 6.4 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 128 L
      • Max trunk load: 110 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 1.9 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.2 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 10 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • E 220d : 3.3 L/hp (4.5 L/kW)
  • E 200 : 3.2 L/hp (4.4 L/kW)
  • E 250 : 3 L/hp (4.1 L/kW)
  • E 400 : 1.9 L/hp (2.6 L/kW)
  • AMG E 43 : 1.6 L/hp (2.2 L/kW)
  • E 350d : 2.5 L/hp (3.4 L/kW)
  • AMG E 63 V8 : 1.1 L/hp (1.5 L/kW)
  • AMG E 63 S V8 : 1 L/hp (1.4 L/kW)
  • AMG E 53 : 1.5 L/hp (2 L/kW)
  • E 300d : 2.6 L/hp (3.6 L/kW)
  • E 300 : 2.5 L/hp (3.4 L/kW)
  • E 450 V6 : 1.7 L/hp (2.4 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • E 220d : 2.72 L/km-h (1.69 L/mph)
  • E 200 : 2.77 L/km-h (1.72 L/mph)
  • E 250 : 2.63 L/km-h (1.63 L/mph)
  • E 400 : 2.56 L/km-h (1.59 L/mph)
  • AMG E 43 : 2.56 L/km-h (1.59 L/mph)
  • E 350d : 2.56 L/km-h (1.59 L/mph)
  • AMG E 63 V8 : 2.56 L/km-h (1.59 L/mph)
  • AMG E 63 S V8 : 2.56 L/km-h (1.59 L/mph)
  • AMG E 53 : 2.56 L/km-h (1.59 L/mph)
  • E 300d : 2.56 L/km-h (1.59 L/mph)
  • E 300 : 2.56 L/km-h (1.59 L/mph)
  • E 450 V6 : 2.56 L/km-h (1.59 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • E 220d : 139.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 200 : 100x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 250 : 97x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 400 : 78x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • AMG E 43 : 74.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 350d : 101.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • AMG E 63 V8 : 70.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • AMG E 63 S V8 : 70.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • AMG E 53 : 86.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 300d : 125.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 300 : 100x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 450 V6 : 75.3x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    E 220d 640 L 88 L to 1 s 12.8x 328x +162L
    E 200 640 L 86 L to 1 s 12.8x 321x +162L
    E 250 640 L 94 L to 1 s 12.8x 321x +162L
    E 400 640 L 125 L to 1 s 9.7x 183x +162L
    AMG E 43 640 L 142 L to 1 s 9.7x 214x +162L
    E 350d 640 L 112 L to 1 s 12.8x 214x +162L
    AMG E 63 V8 640 L 188 L to 1 s 9.7x 161x +162L
    AMG E 63 S V8 640 L 188 L to 1 s 9.7x 161x +162L
    AMG E 53 640 L 149 L to 1 s 9.7x 213x +162L
    E 300d 640 L 103 L to 1 s 12.8x 328x +162L
    E 300 640 L 103 L to 1 s 9.7x 321x +162L
    E 450 V6 640 L 128 L to 1 s 9.7x 214x +162L
    Vehicle E 220d
    Trunk space 640 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 88 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 12.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 328x
    Difference with world average +162L
    Vehicle E 200
    Trunk space 640 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 86 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 12.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 321x
    Difference with world average +162L
    Vehicle E 250
    Trunk space 640 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 94 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 12.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 321x
    Difference with world average +162L
    Vehicle E 400
    Trunk space 640 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 125 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 183x
    Difference with world average +162L
    Vehicle AMG E 43
    Trunk space 640 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 142 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 214x
    Difference with world average +162L
    Vehicle E 350d
    Trunk space 640 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 112 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 12.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 214x
    Difference with world average +162L
    Vehicle AMG E 63 V8
    Trunk space 640 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 188 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 161x
    Difference with world average +162L
    Vehicle AMG E 63 S V8
    Trunk space 640 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 188 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 161x
    Difference with world average +162L
    Vehicle AMG E 53
    Trunk space 640 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 149 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 213x
    Difference with world average +162L
    Vehicle E 300d
    Trunk space 640 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 103 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 12.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 328x
    Difference with world average +162L
    Vehicle E 300
    Trunk space 640 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 103 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 321x
    Difference with world average +162L
    Vehicle E 450 V6
    Trunk space 640 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 128 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 214x
    Difference with world average +162L

    Quick notes on Mercedes-Benz E-class trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 660 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 14.7 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 6.6 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 132 L
      • Max trunk load: 119 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.5 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.2 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 10 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • E 220d : 3.5 L/hp (4.7 L/kW)
  • E 350d V6 : 2.6 L/hp (3.5 L/kW)
  • E 400d : 1.9 L/hp (2.6 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • E 220d : 2.9 L/km-h (1.8 L/mph)
  • E 350d V6 : 2.68 L/km-h (1.67 L/mph)
  • E 400d : 2.56 L/km-h (1.59 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • E 220d : 126.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 350d V6 : 100x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 400d : 120.8x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    E 220d 670 L 88 L to 1 s 13.4x 344x +192L
    E 350d V6 670 L 114 L to 1 s 13.4x 224x +192L
    E 400d 640 L 125 L to 1 s 9.7x 219x +162L
    Vehicle E 220d
    Trunk space 670 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 88 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 13.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 344x
    Difference with world average +192L
    Vehicle E 350d V6
    Trunk space 670 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 114 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 13.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 224x
    Difference with world average +192L
    Vehicle E 400d
    Trunk space 640 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 125 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 219x
    Difference with world average +162L

    Quick notes on Mercedes-Benz E-class trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 450 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 10 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 4.5 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 112.5 L
      • Max trunk load: 103 kg
      • Interior transformation: none
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 1.7 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • E 220 CDI : 2.6 L/hp (3.6 L/kW)
  • E 350 BlueTEC : 1.8 L/hp (2.4 L/kW)
  • E 250 CDI : 2.2 L/hp (3 L/kW)
  • E 350 4MATIC : 1.5 L/hp (2 L/kW)
  • E 250 : 2.1 L/hp (2.9 L/kW)
  • E 350 : 1.5 L/hp (2 L/kW)
  • E 300 : 1.8 L/hp (2.4 L/kW)
  • E 200 : 2.4 L/hp (3.3 L/kW)
  • E 500 : 1.1 L/hp (1.5 L/kW)
  • E 400 : 1.4 L/hp (1.8 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • E 220 CDI : 1.92 L/km-h (1.19 L/mph)
  • E 350 BlueTEC : 1.8 L/km-h (1.12 L/mph)
  • E 250 CDI : 1.8 L/km-h (1.12 L/mph)
  • E 350 4MATIC : 1.8 L/km-h (1.12 L/mph)
  • E 250 : 1.8 L/km-h (1.12 L/mph)
  • E 350 : 1.8 L/km-h (1.12 L/mph)
  • E 300 : 1.8 L/km-h (1.12 L/mph)
  • E 200 : 1.88 L/km-h (1.17 L/mph)
  • E 500 : 1.8 L/km-h (1.12 L/mph)
  • E 400 : 1.8 L/km-h (1.12 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • E 220 CDI : 91.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 350 BlueTEC : 80.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 250 CDI : 88.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 350 4MATIC : 53.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 250 : 73.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 350 : 62.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 300 : 62.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 200 : 75x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 500 : 50.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 400 : 60x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    E 220 CDI 450 L 57 L to 1 s 6.8x 210x -28L
    E 350 BlueTEC 450 L 74 L to 1 s 6.8x 151x -28L
    E 250 CDI 450 L 64 L to 1 s 6.8x 210x -28L
    E 350 4MATIC 450 L 73 L to 1 s 6.8x 129x -28L
    E 250 450 L 67 L to 1 s 6.8x 226x -28L
    E 350 450 L 76 L to 1 s 6.8x 129x -28L
    E 300 450 L 68 L to 1 s 6.8x 129x -28L
    E 200 450 L 61 L to 1 s 6.8x 226x -28L
    E 500 450 L 98 L to 1 s 6.8x 97x -28L
    E 400 450 L 92 L to 1 s 6.8x 150x -28L
    Vehicle E 220 CDI
    Trunk space 450 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 57 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 210x
    Difference with world average -28L
    Vehicle E 350 BlueTEC
    Trunk space 450 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 74 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 151x
    Difference with world average -28L
    Vehicle E 250 CDI
    Trunk space 450 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 64 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 210x
    Difference with world average -28L
    Vehicle E 350 4MATIC
    Trunk space 450 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 73 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 129x
    Difference with world average -28L
    Vehicle E 250
    Trunk space 450 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 67 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 226x
    Difference with world average -28L
    Vehicle E 350
    Trunk space 450 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 76 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 129x
    Difference with world average -28L
    Vehicle E 300
    Trunk space 450 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 68 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 129x
    Difference with world average -28L
    Vehicle E 200
    Trunk space 450 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 61 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 226x
    Difference with world average -28L
    Vehicle E 500
    Trunk space 450 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 98 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 97x
    Difference with world average -28L
    Vehicle E 400
    Trunk space 450 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 92 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 150x
    Difference with world average -28L

    Quick notes on Mercedes-Benz E-class trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 686 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 15.2 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 6.9 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 137.2 L
      • Max trunk load: 115 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.4 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.5 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 10 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • E 200 : 3.8 L/hp (5.1 L/kW)
  • E 220 CDI : 4.1 L/hp (5.6 L/kW)
  • E 250 CDI : 3.4 L/hp (4.6 L/kW)
  • E 300 : 2.8 L/hp (3.8 L/kW)
  • E 250 : 3.3 L/hp (4.5 L/kW)
  • E 350 BlueTEC : 2.4 L/hp (3.2 L/kW)
  • E 300 BlueTEC : 3 L/hp (4.1 L/kW)
  • E 500 : 1.7 L/hp (2.3 L/kW)
  • E 350 : 2.3 L/hp (3.1 L/kW)
  • E 400 : 2.1 L/hp (2.8 L/kW)
  • AMG E 63 : 1.2 L/hp (1.7 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • E 200 : 3.09 L/km-h (1.92 L/mph)
  • E 220 CDI : 3.22 L/km-h (2 L/mph)
  • E 250 CDI : 3 L/km-h (1.86 L/mph)
  • E 300 : 2.86 L/km-h (1.78 L/mph)
  • E 250 : 2.98 L/km-h (1.85 L/mph)
  • E 350 BlueTEC : 2.5 L/km-h (1.55 L/mph)
  • E 300 BlueTEC : 2.9 L/km-h (1.8 L/mph)
  • E 500 : 2.78 L/km-h (1.73 L/mph)
  • E 350 : 2.78 L/km-h (1.73 L/mph)
  • E 400 : 2.78 L/km-h (1.73 L/mph)
  • AMG E 63 : 2.78 L/km-h (1.73 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • E 200 : 112.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 220 CDI : 128.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 250 CDI : 126.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 300 : 88x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 250 : 110.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 350 BlueTEC : 92.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 300 BlueTEC : 113.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 500 : 73.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 350 : 96.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 400 : 79x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • AMG E 63 : 66.2x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    E 200 695 L 88 L to 1 s 11.8x 349x +217L
    E 220 CDI 695 L 85 L to 1 s 11.8x 324x +217L
    E 250 CDI 695 L 94 L to 1 s 11.8x 324x +217L
    E 300 695 L 94 L to 1 s 11.8x 199x +217L
    E 250 695 L 94 L to 1 s 11.8x 349x +217L
    E 350 BlueTEC 600 L 90 L to 1 s 10.2x 201x +122L
    E 300 BlueTEC 695 L 99 L to 1 s 11.8x 233x +217L
    E 500 695 L 148 L to 1 s 8.7x 149x +217L
    E 350 695 L 109 L to 1 s 11.8x 199x +217L
    E 400 695 L 136 L to 1 s 11.8x 232x +217L
    AMG E 63 695 L 193 L to 1 s 10.5x 127x +217L
    Vehicle E 200
    Trunk space 695 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 88 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 11.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 349x
    Difference with world average +217L
    Vehicle E 220 CDI
    Trunk space 695 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 85 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 11.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 324x
    Difference with world average +217L
    Vehicle E 250 CDI
    Trunk space 695 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 94 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 11.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 324x
    Difference with world average +217L
    Vehicle E 300
    Trunk space 695 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 94 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 11.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 199x
    Difference with world average +217L
    Vehicle E 250
    Trunk space 695 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 94 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 11.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 349x
    Difference with world average +217L
    Vehicle E 350 BlueTEC
    Trunk space 600 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 90 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 10.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 201x
    Difference with world average +122L
    Vehicle E 300 BlueTEC
    Trunk space 695 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 99 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 11.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 233x
    Difference with world average +217L
    Vehicle E 500
    Trunk space 695 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 148 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 149x
    Difference with world average +217L
    Vehicle E 350
    Trunk space 695 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 109 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 11.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 199x
    Difference with world average +217L
    Vehicle E 400
    Trunk space 695 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 136 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 11.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 232x
    Difference with world average +217L
    Vehicle AMG E 63
    Trunk space 695 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 193 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 10.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 127x
    Difference with world average +217L

    Quick notes on Mercedes-Benz E-class trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 540 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 12 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 5.4 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 135 L
      • Max trunk load: 108 kg
      • Interior transformation: limited
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 1.9 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.2 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • E 250 CDI : 2.6 L/hp (3.6 L/kW)
  • E 200 CDI : 4 L/hp (5.4 L/kW)
  • E 220 : 3.2 L/hp (4.3 L/kW)
  • E 220 CDI : 3.2 L/hp (4.3 L/kW)
  • E 350 BlueTEC : 2.1 L/hp (2.9 L/kW)
  • E 300 : 2.1 L/hp (2.9 L/kW)
  • E 250 : 2.6 L/hp (3.5 L/kW)
  • E 200 : 2.9 L/hp (4 L/kW)
  • AMG E 63 : 1 L/hp (1.3 L/kW)
  • E 500 4MATIC : 1.3 L/hp (1.8 L/kW)
  • E 400 4MATIC : 1.6 L/hp (2.2 L/kW)
  • E 500 : 1.3 L/hp (1.8 L/kW)
  • E 400 : 1.6 L/hp (2.2 L/kW)
  • E 350 4MATIC : 1.8 L/hp (2.4 L/kW)
  • E 350 : 1.8 L/hp (2.4 L/kW)
  • E 300 4MATIC : 2.1 L/hp (2.9 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • E 250 CDI : 2.23 L/km-h (1.39 L/mph)
  • E 200 CDI : 2.61 L/km-h (1.62 L/mph)
  • E 220 : 2.38 L/km-h (1.48 L/mph)
  • E 220 CDI : 2.38 L/km-h (1.48 L/mph)
  • E 350 BlueTEC : 2.2 L/km-h (1.37 L/mph)
  • E 300 : 2.16 L/km-h (1.34 L/mph)
  • E 250 : 2.22 L/km-h (1.38 L/mph)
  • E 200 : 2.32 L/km-h (1.44 L/mph)
  • AMG E 63 : 2.16 L/km-h (1.34 L/mph)
  • E 500 4MATIC : 2.16 L/km-h (1.34 L/mph)
  • E 400 4MATIC : 2.16 L/km-h (1.34 L/mph)
  • E 500 : 2.16 L/km-h (1.34 L/mph)
  • E 400 : 2.16 L/km-h (1.34 L/mph)
  • E 350 4MATIC : 2.16 L/km-h (1.34 L/mph)
  • E 350 : 2.16 L/km-h (1.34 L/mph)
  • E 300 4MATIC : 2.2 L/km-h (1.37 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • E 250 CDI : 105.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 200 CDI : 103.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 220 : 117.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 220 CDI : 108x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 350 BlueTEC : 84.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 300 : 77.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 250 : 88.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 200 : 88.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • AMG E 63 : 55.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 500 4MATIC : 57.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 400 4MATIC : 63.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 500 : 60.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 400 : 68.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 350 4MATIC : 72x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 350 : 77.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 300 4MATIC : 72x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    E 250 CDI 540 L 76 L to 1 s 9.2x 252x +62L
    E 200 CDI 540 L 60 L to 1 s 9.2x 252x +62L
    E 220 540 L 68 L to 1 s 9.2x 252x +62L
    E 220 CDI 540 L 68 L to 1 s 9.2x 252x +62L
    E 350 BlueTEC 540 L 84 L to 1 s 9.2x 181x +62L
    E 300 540 L 81 L to 1 s 9.2x 154x +62L
    E 250 540 L 77 L to 1 s 9.2x 271x +62L
    E 200 540 L 72 L to 1 s 9.2x 271x +62L
    AMG E 63 540 L 135 L to 1 s 8.2x 99x +62L
    E 500 4MATIC 540 L 117 L to 1 s 6.8x 116x +62L
    E 400 4MATIC 540 L 108 L to 1 s 9.2x 180x +62L
    E 500 540 L 115 L to 1 s 6.8x 116x +62L
    E 400 540 L 108 L to 1 s 9.2x 180x +62L
    E 350 4MATIC 540 L 86 L to 1 s 9.2x 154x +62L
    E 350 540 L 90 L to 1 s 9.2x 154x +62L
    E 300 4MATIC 540 L 77 L to 1 s 9.2x 154x +62L
    Vehicle E 250 CDI
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 76 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 252x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 200 CDI
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 60 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 252x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 220
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 68 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 252x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 220 CDI
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 68 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 252x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 350 BlueTEC
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 84 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 181x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 300
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 81 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 154x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 250
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 77 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 271x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 200
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 72 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 271x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle AMG E 63
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 135 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 99x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 500 4MATIC
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 117 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 116x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 400 4MATIC
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 108 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 180x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 500
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 115 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 116x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 400
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 108 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 180x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 350 4MATIC
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 86 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 154x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 350
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 90 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 154x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 300 4MATIC
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 77 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 154x
    Difference with world average +62L

    Quick notes on Mercedes-Benz E-class trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 323 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 7.2 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 3.2 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 80.8 L
      • Max trunk load: 109 kg
      • Interior transformation: none
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 1.2 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 0.8 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • E 220 CDI : 1.8 L/hp (2.4 L/kW)
  • E 250 CDI : 1.5 L/hp (2 L/kW)
  • E 200 : 1.6 L/hp (2.2 L/kW)
  • E 350 : 1 L/hp (1.3 L/kW)
  • E 500 : 0.7 L/hp (1 L/kW)
  • E 400 : 1.2 L/hp (1.6 L/kW)
  • E 250 : 1.8 L/hp (2.5 L/kW)
  • E 300 : 1.2 L/hp (1.6 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • E 220 CDI : 1.3 L/km-h (0.81 L/mph)
  • E 250 CDI : 1.23 L/km-h (0.76 L/mph)
  • E 200 : 1.28 L/km-h (0.8 L/mph)
  • E 350 : 1.2 L/km-h (0.75 L/mph)
  • E 500 : 1.2 L/km-h (0.75 L/mph)
  • E 400 : 1.56 L/km-h (0.97 L/mph)
  • E 250 : 1.59 L/km-h (0.99 L/mph)
  • E 300 : 1.2 L/km-h (0.75 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • E 220 CDI : 61.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 250 CDI : 61.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 200 : 47.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 350 : 40x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 500 : 33x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 400 : 49.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 250 : 60.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 300 : 40x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    E 220 CDI 300 L 36 L to 1 s 4.5x 140x -178L
    E 250 CDI 300 L 41 L to 1 s 4.5x 140x -178L
    E 200 300 L 38 L to 1 s 4.5x 151x -178L
    E 350 300 L 49 L to 1 s 4.5x 86x -178L
    E 500 300 L 64 L to 1 s 4.5x 64x -178L
    E 400 390 L 78 L to 1 s 5.9x 130x -88L
    E 250 390 L 55 L to 1 s 5.9x 196x -88L
    E 300 300 L 44 L to 1 s 4.5x 86x -178L
    Vehicle E 220 CDI
    Trunk space 300 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 36 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 140x
    Difference with world average -178L
    Vehicle E 250 CDI
    Trunk space 300 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 41 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 140x
    Difference with world average -178L
    Vehicle E 200
    Trunk space 300 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 38 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 151x
    Difference with world average -178L
    Vehicle E 350
    Trunk space 300 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 49 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 86x
    Difference with world average -178L
    Vehicle E 500
    Trunk space 300 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 64 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 64x
    Difference with world average -178L
    Vehicle E 400
    Trunk space 390 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 78 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 130x
    Difference with world average -88L
    Vehicle E 250
    Trunk space 390 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 55 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 196x
    Difference with world average -88L
    Vehicle E 300
    Trunk space 300 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 44 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 86x
    Difference with world average -178L

    Quick notes on Mercedes-Benz E-class trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 300 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 6.7 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 3 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 75 L
      • Max trunk load: 107 kg
      • Interior transformation: none
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 1.3 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 0.7 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 4 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • E 200 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY : 1.7 L/hp (2.3 L/kW)
  • E 250 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY : 1.5 L/hp (2 L/kW)
  • E 220 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY : 1.8 L/hp (2.4 L/kW)
  • E 350 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY : 1.3 L/hp (1.8 L/kW)
  • E 250 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY : 1.5 L/hp (2 L/kW)
  • E 350 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY : 1 L/hp (1.4 L/kW)
  • E 500 : 0.8 L/hp (1.1 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • E 200 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY : 1.27 L/km-h (0.79 L/mph)
  • E 250 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY : 1.22 L/km-h (0.76 L/mph)
  • E 220 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY : 1.29 L/km-h (0.8 L/mph)
  • E 350 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY : 1.2 L/km-h (0.75 L/mph)
  • E 250 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY : 1.25 L/km-h (0.78 L/mph)
  • E 350 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY : 1.2 L/km-h (0.75 L/mph)
  • E 500 : 1.2 L/km-h (0.75 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • E 200 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY : 40.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 250 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY : 53.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 220 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY : 55.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 350 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY : 42.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 250 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY : 38x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 350 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY : 34.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 500 : 27.3x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    E 200 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY 300 L 36 L to 1 s 4.5x 167x -178L
    E 250 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 300 L 41 L to 1 s 4.5x 140x -178L
    E 220 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 300 L 36 L to 1 s 4.5x 140x -178L
    E 350 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 300 L 45 L to 1 s 4.5x 100x -178L
    E 250 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY 300 L 41 L to 1 s 4.5x 167x -178L
    E 350 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY 300 L 46 L to 1 s 4.5x 86x -178L
    E 500 300 L 60 L to 1 s 4.5x 55x -178L
    Vehicle E 200 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY
    Trunk space 300 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 36 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 167x
    Difference with world average -178L
    Vehicle E 250 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY
    Trunk space 300 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 41 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 140x
    Difference with world average -178L
    Vehicle E 220 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY
    Trunk space 300 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 36 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 140x
    Difference with world average -178L
    Vehicle E 350 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY
    Trunk space 300 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 45 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 100x
    Difference with world average -178L
    Vehicle E 250 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY
    Trunk space 300 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 41 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 167x
    Difference with world average -178L
    Vehicle E 350 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY
    Trunk space 300 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 46 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 86x
    Difference with world average -178L
    Vehicle E 500
    Trunk space 300 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 60 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 55x
    Difference with world average -178L

    Quick notes on Mercedes-Benz E-class trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 540 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 12 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 5.4 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 108 L
      • Max trunk load: 105 kg
      • Interior transformation: limited
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.5 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.3 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • E 200 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY : 2.9 L/hp (4 L/kW)
  • E 250 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY : 2.6 L/hp (3.6 L/kW)
  • E 220 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY : 3.2 L/hp (4.3 L/kW)
  • E 200 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY : 4 L/hp (5.4 L/kW)
  • E 350 CDI 4MATIC BlueEFFICIENCY : 2.3 L/hp (3.2 L/kW)
  • E 350 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY : 2.3 L/hp (3.2 L/kW)
  • E 350 BlueTEC : 2.6 L/hp (3.5 L/kW)
  • E 350 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY : 1.8 L/hp (2.5 L/kW)
  • E 250 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY : 2.6 L/hp (3.6 L/kW)
  • E 350 4MATIC BlueEFFICIENCY : 2 L/hp (2.7 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • E 200 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY : 2.3 L/km-h (1.43 L/mph)
  • E 250 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY : 2.23 L/km-h (1.39 L/mph)
  • E 220 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY : 2.34 L/km-h (1.45 L/mph)
  • E 200 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY : 2.51 L/km-h (1.56 L/mph)
  • E 350 CDI 4MATIC BlueEFFICIENCY : 2.19 L/km-h (1.36 L/mph)
  • E 350 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY : 2.18 L/km-h (1.35 L/mph)
  • E 350 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY : 2.16 L/km-h (1.34 L/mph)
  • E 250 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY : 2.24 L/km-h (1.39 L/mph)
  • E 350 4MATIC BlueEFFICIENCY : 2.16 L/km-h (1.34 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • E 200 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY : 81.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 250 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY : 101.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 220 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY : 101.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 200 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY : 101.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 350 CDI 4MATIC BlueEFFICIENCY : 74x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 350 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY : 79.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 350 BlueTEC : 77.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 350 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY : 63.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 250 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY : 74x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 350 4MATIC BlueEFFICIENCY : 61.4x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    E 200 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY 540 L 65 L to 1 s 9.2x 301x +62L
    E 250 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 540 L 69 L to 1 s 9.2x 252x +62L
    E 220 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 540 L 63 L to 1 s 9.2x 252x +62L
    E 200 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 540 L 53 L to 1 s 9.2x 252x +62L
    E 350 CDI 4MATIC BlueEFFICIENCY 540 L 89 L to 1 s 6.8x 181x +62L
    E 350 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 540 L 82 L to 1 s 6.8x 181x +62L
    E 350 BlueTEC 540 L - 6.8x 181x +62L
    E 350 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY 540 L 90 L to 1 s 6.8x 155x +62L
    E 250 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY 540 L 73 L to 1 s 9.2x 301x +62L
    E 350 4MATIC BlueEFFICIENCY 540 L 89 L to 1 s 6.8x 155x +62L
    Vehicle E 200 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 65 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 301x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 250 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 69 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 252x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 220 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 63 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 252x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 200 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 53 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 252x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 350 CDI 4MATIC BlueEFFICIENCY
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 89 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 181x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 350 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 82 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 181x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 350 BlueTEC
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 181x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 350 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 90 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 155x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 250 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 73 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 301x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 350 4MATIC BlueEFFICIENCY
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 89 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 155x
    Difference with world average +62L

    Quick notes on Mercedes-Benz E-class trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 450 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 10 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 4.5 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 112.5 L
      • Max trunk load: 101 kg
      • Interior transformation: none
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 1.9 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • E 200 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY : 2.7 L/hp (3.6 L/kW)
  • E 220 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY : 2.7 L/hp (3.6 L/kW)
  • E 250 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY : 2.2 L/hp (3 L/kW)
  • E 250 CDI : 2.2 L/hp (3 L/kW)
  • E 250 CGI : 2.2 L/hp (3 L/kW)
  • E 350 CGI : 1.5 L/hp (2.1 L/kW)
  • E 350 CDI : 1.9 L/hp (2.6 L/kW)
  • E 500 : 1.2 L/hp (1.6 L/kW)
  • E 250 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY : 2.2 L/hp (3 L/kW)
  • E 350 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY : 2 L/hp (2.7 L/kW)
  • E 350 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY : 1.6 L/hp (2.1 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • E 200 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY : 1.91 L/km-h (1.19 L/mph)
  • E 220 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY : 1.91 L/km-h (1.19 L/mph)
  • E 250 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY : 1.8 L/km-h (1.12 L/mph)
  • E 250 CDI : 1.81 L/km-h (1.12 L/mph)
  • E 250 CGI : 1.8 L/km-h (1.12 L/mph)
  • E 350 CGI : 1.8 L/km-h (1.12 L/mph)
  • E 350 CDI : 1.8 L/km-h (1.12 L/mph)
  • E 500 : 1.8 L/km-h (1.12 L/mph)
  • E 250 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY : 1.82 L/km-h (1.13 L/mph)
  • E 350 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY : 1.8 L/km-h (1.12 L/mph)
  • E 350 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY : 1.8 L/km-h (1.12 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • E 200 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY : 88.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 220 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY : 88.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 250 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY : 88.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 250 CDI : 77.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 250 CGI : 84.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 350 CGI : 52.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 350 CDI : 66.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 500 : 41.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 250 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY : 60x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 350 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY : 66.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 350 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY : 52.9x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    E 200 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY 450 L 56 L to 1 s 6.8x 210x -28L
    E 220 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 450 L 56 L to 1 s 6.8x 210x -28L
    E 250 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 450 L 64 L to 1 s 6.8x 210x -28L
    E 250 CDI 450 L 66 L to 1 s 6.8x 210x -28L
    E 250 CGI 450 L 58 L to 1 s 6.8x 251x -28L
    E 350 CGI 450 L 75 L to 1 s 6.8x 129x -28L
    E 350 CDI 450 L 78 L to 1 s 6.8x 151x -28L
    E 500 450 L 92 L to 1 s 6.8x 82x -28L
    E 250 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY 450 L 64 L to 1 s 6.8x 251x -28L
    E 350 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 450 L 70 L to 1 s 6.8x 151x -28L
    E 350 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY 450 L 75 L to 1 s 6.8x 129x -28L
    Vehicle E 200 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY
    Trunk space 450 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 56 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 210x
    Difference with world average -28L
    Vehicle E 220 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY
    Trunk space 450 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 56 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 210x
    Difference with world average -28L
    Vehicle E 250 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY
    Trunk space 450 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 64 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 210x
    Difference with world average -28L
    Vehicle E 250 CDI
    Trunk space 450 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 66 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 210x
    Difference with world average -28L
    Vehicle E 250 CGI
    Trunk space 450 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 58 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 251x
    Difference with world average -28L
    Vehicle E 350 CGI
    Trunk space 450 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 75 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 129x
    Difference with world average -28L
    Vehicle E 350 CDI
    Trunk space 450 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 78 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 151x
    Difference with world average -28L
    Vehicle E 500
    Trunk space 450 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 92 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 82x
    Difference with world average -28L
    Vehicle E 250 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY
    Trunk space 450 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 64 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 251x
    Difference with world average -28L
    Vehicle E 350 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY
    Trunk space 450 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 70 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 151x
    Difference with world average -28L
    Vehicle E 350 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY
    Trunk space 450 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 75 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 129x
    Difference with world average -28L

    Quick notes on Mercedes-Benz E-class trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 695 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 15.4 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 7 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 139 L
      • Max trunk load: 111 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.9 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.7 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 10 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • E 200 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY : 3.8 L/hp (5.1 L/kW)
  • E 250 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY : 3.4 L/hp (4.6 L/kW)
  • E 200 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY : 3.8 L/hp (5.1 L/kW)
  • E 220 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY : 4.1 L/hp (5.6 L/kW)
  • E 250 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY : 3.4 L/hp (4.6 L/kW)
  • E 350 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY : 3 L/hp (4.1 L/kW)
  • E 350 CDI 4MATIC BlueEFFICIENCY : 3 L/hp (4.1 L/kW)
  • E 500 : 1.8 L/hp (2.4 L/kW)
  • E 350 4MATIC : 2.6 L/hp (3.5 L/kW)
  • E 350 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY : 2.4 L/hp (3.2 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • E 200 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY : 3.09 L/km-h (1.92 L/mph)
  • E 250 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY : 2.98 L/km-h (1.85 L/mph)
  • E 200 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY : 3.09 L/km-h (1.92 L/mph)
  • E 220 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY : 3.19 L/km-h (1.98 L/mph)
  • E 250 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY : 3.02 L/km-h (1.88 L/mph)
  • E 350 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY : 2.9 L/km-h (1.8 L/mph)
  • E 350 CDI 4MATIC BlueEFFICIENCY : 2.96 L/km-h (1.84 L/mph)
  • E 500 : 2.78 L/km-h (1.73 L/mph)
  • E 350 4MATIC : 2.86 L/km-h (1.78 L/mph)
  • E 350 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY : 2.78 L/km-h (1.73 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • E 200 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY : 90.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 250 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY : 119.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 200 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY : 88x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 220 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY : 119.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 250 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY : 86.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 350 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY : 99.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 350 CDI 4MATIC BlueEFFICIENCY : 91.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 500 : 62.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 350 4MATIC : 68.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 350 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY : 80.8x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    E 200 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY 695 L 84 L to 1 s 11.8x 387x +217L
    E 250 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 695 L 94 L to 1 s 11.8x 387x +217L
    E 200 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 695 L 84 L to 1 s 11.8x 387x +217L
    E 220 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 695 L 83 L to 1 s 11.8x 387x +217L
    E 250 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY 695 L 87 L to 1 s 11.8x 387x +217L
    E 350 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 695 L 102 L to 1 s 8.7x 233x +217L
    E 350 CDI 4MATIC BlueEFFICIENCY 695 L 98 L to 1 s 8.7x 233x +217L
    E 500 695 L 136 L to 1 s 8.7x 127x +217L
    E 350 4MATIC 695 L 98 L to 1 s 8.7x 199x +217L
    E 350 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY 695 L 104 L to 1 s 8.7x 199x +217L
    Vehicle E 200 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY
    Trunk space 695 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 84 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 11.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 387x
    Difference with world average +217L
    Vehicle E 250 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY
    Trunk space 695 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 94 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 11.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 387x
    Difference with world average +217L
    Vehicle E 200 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY
    Trunk space 695 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 84 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 11.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 387x
    Difference with world average +217L
    Vehicle E 220 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY
    Trunk space 695 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 83 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 11.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 387x
    Difference with world average +217L
    Vehicle E 250 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY
    Trunk space 695 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 87 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 11.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 387x
    Difference with world average +217L
    Vehicle E 350 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY
    Trunk space 695 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 102 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 233x
    Difference with world average +217L
    Vehicle E 350 CDI 4MATIC BlueEFFICIENCY
    Trunk space 695 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 98 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 233x
    Difference with world average +217L
    Vehicle E 500
    Trunk space 695 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 136 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 127x
    Difference with world average +217L
    Vehicle E 350 4MATIC
    Trunk space 695 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 98 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 199x
    Difference with world average +217L
    Vehicle E 350 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY
    Trunk space 695 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 104 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 199x
    Difference with world average +217L

    Quick notes on Mercedes-Benz E-class trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 559 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 12.4 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 5.6 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 111.8 L
      • Max trunk load: 103 kg
      • Interior transformation: limited
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.3 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.1 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 10 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • E 280 V6 : 2.3 L/hp (3.2 L/kW)
  • E 320 CDI V6 : 2.4 L/hp (3.3 L/kW)
  • E 420 CDI V8 : 1.7 L/hp (2.3 L/kW)
  • E 300 BlueTec V6 : 3 L/hp (4 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • E 280 V6 : 2.21 L/km-h (1.37 L/mph)
  • E 320 CDI V6 : 2.16 L/km-h (1.34 L/mph)
  • E 420 CDI V8 : 2.12 L/km-h (1.32 L/mph)
  • E 300 BlueTec V6 : 2.56 L/km-h (1.59 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • E 280 V6 : 54.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 320 CDI V6 : 74x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 420 CDI V8 : 57x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 300 BlueTec V6 : 85.6x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    E 280 V6 540 L 73 L to 1 s 6.8x 180x +62L
    E 320 CDI V6 540 L 83 L to 1 s 6.8x 181x +62L
    E 420 CDI V8 530 L 91 L to 1 s 6.6x 133x +52L
    E 300 BlueTec V6 625 L 92 L to 1 s - 209x +147L
    Vehicle E 280 V6
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 73 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 180x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 320 CDI V6
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 83 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 181x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 420 CDI V8
    Trunk space 530 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 91 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 133x
    Difference with world average +52L
    Vehicle E 300 BlueTec V6
    Trunk space 625 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 92 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size -
    Trunk space to engine capacity 209x
    Difference with world average +147L

    Quick notes on Mercedes-Benz E-class trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 690 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 15.3 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 6.9 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 138 L
      • Max trunk load: 108 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.8 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.8 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 10 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • E 270 CDI : 3.9 L/hp (5.3 L/kW)
  • E 200 Kompressor : 4.2 L/hp (5.8 L/kW)
  • E 220 CDI : 4.6 L/hp (6.3 L/kW)
  • E 240 : 3.9 L/hp (5.3 L/kW)
  • E 200 CDI : 5.1 L/hp (6.9 L/kW)
  • E 230 : 3.4 L/hp (4.6 L/kW)
  • E 240 4 Matic : 3.9 L/hp (5.3 L/kW)
  • E 280 CDI : 3.6 L/hp (4.9 L/kW)
  • E 320 : 3.1 L/hp (4.2 L/kW)
  • E 320 4 Matic : 3.1 L/hp (4.2 L/kW)
  • E 320 CDI : 3.4 L/hp (4.6 L/kW)
  • E 350 : 2.5 L/hp (3.5 L/kW)
  • E 350 CGI : 2.4 L/hp (3.2 L/kW)
  • E 350 4Matic : 2.5 L/hp (3.5 L/kW)
  • E 500 : 2.3 L/hp (3.1 L/kW)
  • E 500 4Matic : 2.3 L/hp (3.1 L/kW)
  • AMG E 55 : 1.4 L/hp (2 L/kW)
  • E 550 4 matic : 1.8 L/hp (2.4 L/kW)
  • E 550 : 1.8 L/hp (2.4 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • E 270 CDI : 3.09 L/km-h (1.92 L/mph)
  • E 200 Kompressor : 3.14 L/km-h (1.95 L/mph)
  • E 220 CDI : 3.32 L/km-h (2.06 L/mph)
  • E 240 : 3.09 L/km-h (1.92 L/mph)
  • E 200 CDI : 3.45 L/km-h (2.14 L/mph)
  • E 230 : 2.96 L/km-h (1.84 L/mph)
  • E 240 4 Matic : 3.22 L/km-h (2 L/mph)
  • E 280 CDI : 3 L/km-h (1.86 L/mph)
  • E 320 : 2.88 L/km-h (1.79 L/mph)
  • E 320 4 Matic : 2.92 L/km-h (1.81 L/mph)
  • E 320 CDI : 2.95 L/km-h (1.83 L/mph)
  • E 350 : 2.76 L/km-h (1.72 L/mph)
  • E 350 CGI : 2.76 L/km-h (1.72 L/mph)
  • E 350 4Matic : 2.76 L/km-h (1.72 L/mph)
  • E 500 : 2.76 L/km-h (1.72 L/mph)
  • E 500 4Matic : 2.76 L/km-h (1.72 L/mph)
  • AMG E 55 : 2.76 L/km-h (1.72 L/mph)
  • E 550 4 matic : 2.76 L/km-h (1.72 L/mph)
  • E 550 : 2.76 L/km-h (1.72 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • E 270 CDI : 97.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 200 Kompressor : 75.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 220 CDI : 100x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 240 : 60.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 200 CDI : 97.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 230 : 71.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 240 4 Matic : 63.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 320 : 90.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 320 4 Matic : 83.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 320 CDI : 94.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 350 CGI : 77.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 500 : 59.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • AMG E 55 : 50.7x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    E 270 CDI 690 L 78 L to 1 s 9.9x 257x +212L
    E 200 Kompressor 690 L 72 L to 1 s 9.9x 384x +212L
    E 220 CDI 690 L 68 L to 1 s 9.9x 321x +212L
    E 240 690 L 78 L to 1 s 9.9x 266x +212L
    E 200 CDI 690 L 68 L to 1 s 9.9x 321x +212L
    E 230 690 L 73 L to 1 s 9.9x 276x +212L
    E 240 4 Matic 690 L 67 L to 1 s 9.9x 266x +212L
    E 280 CDI 690 L 88 L to 1 s 9.9x 231x +212L
    E 320 690 L 100 L to 1 s 9.9x 216x +212L
    E 320 4 Matic 690 L 90 L to 1 s 8.6x 216x +212L
    E 320 CDI 690 L 88 L to 1 s 9.9x 214x +212L
    E 350 690 L 103 L to 1 s 9.9x 197x +212L
    E 350 CGI 690 L 103 L to 1 s 9.9x 197x +212L
    E 350 4Matic 690 L 99 L to 1 s 9.9x 197x +212L
    E 500 690 L 111 L to 1 s 8.6x 139x +212L
    E 500 4Matic 690 L 106 L to 1 s 8.6x 139x +212L
    AMG E 55 690 L 150 L to 1 s 8.6x 127x +212L
    E 550 4 matic 690 L 128 L to 1 s 8.6x 126x +212L
    E 550 690 L 135 L to 1 s 8.6x 126x +212L
    Vehicle E 270 CDI
    Trunk space 690 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 78 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 257x
    Difference with world average +212L
    Vehicle E 200 Kompressor
    Trunk space 690 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 72 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 384x
    Difference with world average +212L
    Vehicle E 220 CDI
    Trunk space 690 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 68 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 321x
    Difference with world average +212L
    Vehicle E 240
    Trunk space 690 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 78 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 266x
    Difference with world average +212L
    Vehicle E 200 CDI
    Trunk space 690 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 68 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 321x
    Difference with world average +212L
    Vehicle E 230
    Trunk space 690 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 73 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 276x
    Difference with world average +212L
    Vehicle E 240 4 Matic
    Trunk space 690 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 67 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 266x
    Difference with world average +212L
    Vehicle E 280 CDI
    Trunk space 690 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 88 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 231x
    Difference with world average +212L
    Vehicle E 320
    Trunk space 690 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 100 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 216x
    Difference with world average +212L
    Vehicle E 320 4 Matic
    Trunk space 690 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 90 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 216x
    Difference with world average +212L
    Vehicle E 320 CDI
    Trunk space 690 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 88 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 214x
    Difference with world average +212L
    Vehicle E 350
    Trunk space 690 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 103 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 197x
    Difference with world average +212L
    Vehicle E 350 CGI
    Trunk space 690 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 103 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 197x
    Difference with world average +212L
    Vehicle E 350 4Matic
    Trunk space 690 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 99 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 197x
    Difference with world average +212L
    Vehicle E 500
    Trunk space 690 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 111 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 139x
    Difference with world average +212L
    Vehicle E 500 4Matic
    Trunk space 690 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 106 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 139x
    Difference with world average +212L
    Vehicle AMG E 55
    Trunk space 690 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 150 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 127x
    Difference with world average +212L
    Vehicle E 550 4 matic
    Trunk space 690 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 128 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 126x
    Difference with world average +212L
    Vehicle E 550
    Trunk space 690 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 135 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 126x
    Difference with world average +212L

    Quick notes on Mercedes-Benz E-class trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 690 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 15.3 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 6.9 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 138 L
      • Max trunk load: 109 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.5 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.6 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 10 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • E 200 Kompressor : 3.8 L/hp (5.1 L/kW)
  • E 220 CDI : 4.1 L/hp (5.5 L/kW)
  • E 280 V6 : 3 L/hp (4.1 L/kW)
  • E 280 CDI V6 : 3.6 L/hp (4.9 L/kW)
  • E 500 V8 : 1.8 L/hp (2.4 L/kW)
  • AMG E 63 V8 : 1.3 L/hp (1.8 L/kW)
  • E 320 CDI V6 : 3.1 L/hp (4.2 L/kW)
  • E 350 V6 : 2.5 L/hp (3.5 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • E 200 Kompressor : 3.07 L/km-h (1.91 L/mph)
  • E 220 CDI : 3.17 L/km-h (1.97 L/mph)
  • E 280 V6 : 2.97 L/km-h (1.85 L/mph)
  • E 280 CDI V6 : 2.99 L/km-h (1.86 L/mph)
  • E 500 V8 : 2.76 L/km-h (1.72 L/mph)
  • AMG E 63 V8 : 2.76 L/km-h (1.72 L/mph)
  • E 320 CDI V6 : 2.92 L/km-h (1.81 L/mph)
  • E 350 V6 : 2.82 L/km-h (1.75 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • E 200 Kompressor : 77.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 220 CDI : 94.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 280 V6 : 67x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 280 CDI V6 : 95.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 500 V8 : 54.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • AMG E 63 V8 : 47.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 320 CDI V6 : 83.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 350 V6 : 65.1x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    E 200 Kompressor 690 L 77 L to 1 s 9.9x 384x +212L
    E 220 CDI 690 L 80 L to 1 s 9.9x 321x +212L
    E 280 V6 690 L 87 L to 1 s 9.9x 230x +212L
    E 280 CDI V6 690 L 80 L to 1 s 9.9x 231x +212L
    E 500 V8 690 L 128 L to 1 s 8.6x 126x +212L
    AMG E 63 V8 690 L 157 L to 1 s 8.6x 111x +212L
    E 320 CDI V6 690 L 90 L to 1 s 8.6x 231x +212L
    E 350 V6 690 L 99 L to 1 s 8.6x 197x +212L
    Vehicle E 200 Kompressor
    Trunk space 690 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 77 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 384x
    Difference with world average +212L
    Vehicle E 220 CDI
    Trunk space 690 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 80 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 321x
    Difference with world average +212L
    Vehicle E 280 V6
    Trunk space 690 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 87 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 230x
    Difference with world average +212L
    Vehicle E 280 CDI V6
    Trunk space 690 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 80 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 231x
    Difference with world average +212L
    Vehicle E 500 V8
    Trunk space 690 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 128 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 126x
    Difference with world average +212L
    Vehicle AMG E 63 V8
    Trunk space 690 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 157 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 111x
    Difference with world average +212L
    Vehicle E 320 CDI V6
    Trunk space 690 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 90 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 231x
    Difference with world average +212L
    Vehicle E 350 V6
    Trunk space 690 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 99 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 197x
    Difference with world average +212L

    Quick notes on Mercedes-Benz E-class trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 540 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 12 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 5.4 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 108 L
      • Max trunk load: 103 kg
      • Interior transformation: limited
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.4 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.3 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • E 200 Kompressor : 3.3 L/hp (4.5 L/kW)
  • E 200 CDI : 4.4 L/hp (6 L/kW)
  • E 220 CDI : 3.6 L/hp (4.9 L/kW)
  • E 240 V6 : 3.1 L/hp (4.2 L/kW)
  • E 270 CDI : 3.1 L/hp (4.2 L/kW)
  • E 280 CDI V6 : 2.8 L/hp (3.9 L/kW)
  • E 320 V6 : 2.4 L/hp (3.3 L/kW)
  • E 320 CDI : 2.6 L/hp (3.6 L/kW)
  • E 350 V6 : 2 L/hp (2.7 L/kW)
  • E 400 CDI V8 : 2.1 L/hp (2.8 L/kW)
  • E 500 V8 : 1.8 L/hp (2.4 L/kW)
  • AMG E 55 V8 : 1.1 L/hp (1.5 L/kW)
  • E 320 CDI V6 : 2.4 L/hp (3.3 L/kW)
  • E 280 CDI : 3.1 L/hp (4.2 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • E 200 Kompressor : 2.35 L/km-h (1.46 L/mph)
  • E 200 CDI : 2.66 L/km-h (1.65 L/mph)
  • E 220 CDI : 2.52 L/km-h (1.57 L/mph)
  • E 240 V6 : 2.32 L/km-h (1.44 L/mph)
  • E 270 CDI : 2.33 L/km-h (1.45 L/mph)
  • E 280 CDI V6 : 2.27 L/km-h (1.41 L/mph)
  • E 320 V6 : 2.21 L/km-h (1.37 L/mph)
  • E 320 CDI : 2.22 L/km-h (1.38 L/mph)
  • E 350 V6 : 2.16 L/km-h (1.34 L/mph)
  • E 400 CDI V8 : 2.16 L/km-h (1.34 L/mph)
  • E 500 V8 : 2.16 L/km-h (1.34 L/mph)
  • AMG E 55 V8 : 2.16 L/km-h (1.34 L/mph)
  • E 320 CDI V6 : 2.21 L/km-h (1.37 L/mph)
  • E 280 CDI : 2.37 L/km-h (1.47 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • E 200 Kompressor : 64.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 200 CDI : 84.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 220 CDI : 83.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 240 V6 : 51.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 270 CDI : 76.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 280 CDI V6 : 75x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 320 V6 : 54x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 320 CDI : 78.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 350 V6 : 51.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 400 CDI V8 : 57.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 500 V8 : 44.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • AMG E 55 V8 : 41.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 320 CDI V6 : 68.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 280 CDI : 74x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    E 200 Kompressor 540 L 59 L to 1 s 8.3x 301x +62L
    E 200 CDI 540 L 47 L to 1 s 8.3x 251x +62L
    E 220 CDI 540 L 56 L to 1 s 8.3x 251x +62L
    E 240 V6 540 L 53 L to 1 s 8.3x 208x +62L
    E 270 CDI 540 L 61 L to 1 s 8.3x 201x +62L
    E 280 CDI V6 540 L 75 L to 1 s 8.3x 181x +62L
    E 320 V6 540 L 72 L to 1 s 6.8x 169x +62L
    E 320 CDI 540 L 74 L to 1 s 8.3x 168x +62L
    E 350 V6 540 L 81 L to 1 s 6.8x 154x +62L
    E 400 CDI V8 540 L 82 L to 1 s 6.8x 135x +62L
    E 500 V8 540 L 102 L to 1 s 6.8x 109x +62L
    AMG E 55 V8 540 L 120 L to 1 s 6.8x 99x +62L
    E 320 CDI V6 540 L 77 L to 1 s 6.8x 181x +62L
    E 280 CDI 540 L 62 L to 1 s 8.3x 168x +62L
    Vehicle E 200 Kompressor
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 59 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 301x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 200 CDI
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 47 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 251x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 220 CDI
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 56 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 251x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 240 V6
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 53 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 208x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 270 CDI
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 61 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 201x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 280 CDI V6
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 75 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 181x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 320 V6
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 72 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 169x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 320 CDI
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 74 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 168x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 350 V6
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 81 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 154x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 400 CDI V8
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 82 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 135x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 500 V8
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 102 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 109x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle AMG E 55 V8
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 120 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 99x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 320 CDI V6
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 77 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 181x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle E 280 CDI
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 62 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 168x
    Difference with world average +62L

    Quick notes on Mercedes-Benz E-class trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 596 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 13.2 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 6 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 119.2 L
      • Max trunk load: 99 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 3 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.9 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 10 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • E 200 T : 4.4 L/hp (6 L/kW)
  • E 220 CDI : 4.2 L/hp (5.7 L/kW)
  • E 240 T : 3.5 L/hp (4.8 L/kW)
  • E 250 T D : 4.7 L/hp (6.4 L/kW)
  • E 230 T : 4 L/hp (5.5 L/kW)
  • E 270 CDI : 3.5 L/hp (4.8 L/kW)
  • E 280 T 4-matic : 2.9 L/hp (4 L/kW)
  • E 280 T : 2.9 L/hp (4 L/kW)
  • E 290 T Turbo-D : 4.7 L/hp (6.3 L/kW)
  • E 320 CDI : 3 L/hp (4.1 L/kW)
  • E 300 T Turbo-D : 3.4 L/hp (4.6 L/kW)
  • E 320 T 4-matic : 2.7 L/hp (3.6 L/kW)
  • E 320 T : 2.7 L/hp (3.6 L/kW)
  • E 430 4-matic : 2.2 L/hp (2.9 L/kW)
  • AMG E 55 T : 1.7 L/hp (2.3 L/kW)
  • E 430 T : 2.2 L/hp (2.9 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • E 200 T : 3.03 L/km-h (1.88 L/mph)
  • E 220 CDI : 2.93 L/km-h (1.82 L/mph)
  • E 240 T : 2.79 L/km-h (1.73 L/mph)
  • E 250 T D : 2.94 L/km-h (1.83 L/mph)
  • E 230 T : 2.93 L/km-h (1.82 L/mph)
  • E 270 CDI : 2.79 L/km-h (1.73 L/mph)
  • E 280 T 4-matic : 2.76 L/km-h (1.72 L/mph)
  • E 280 T : 2.67 L/km-h (1.66 L/mph)
  • E 290 T Turbo-D : 3.11 L/km-h (1.93 L/mph)
  • E 320 CDI : 2.64 L/km-h (1.64 L/mph)
  • E 300 T Turbo-D : 2.79 L/km-h (1.73 L/mph)
  • E 320 T 4-matic : 2.67 L/km-h (1.66 L/mph)
  • E 320 T : 2.61 L/km-h (1.62 L/mph)
  • E 430 4-matic : 2.47 L/km-h (1.53 L/mph)
  • AMG E 55 T : 2.4 L/km-h (1.49 L/mph)
  • E 430 T : 2.47 L/km-h (1.53 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • E 250 T D : 62.4x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    E 200 T 600 L 52 L to 1 s 8.6x 300x +122L
    E 220 CDI 600 L 58 L to 1 s 8.6x 279x +122L
    E 240 T 600 L 60 L to 1 s 8.6x 250x +122L
    E 250 T D 530 L 34 L to 1 s 7.4x 212x +52L
    E 230 T 600 L 57 L to 1 s 8.6x 261x +122L
    E 270 CDI 600 L 67 L to 1 s 8.6x 223x +122L
    E 280 T 4-matic 600 L 62 L to 1 s 8.6x 214x +122L
    E 280 T 600 L 67 L to 1 s 8.6x 214x +122L
    E 290 T Turbo-D 600 L 52 L to 1 s 8.6x 209x +122L
    E 320 CDI 600 L 71 L to 1 s 8.6x 186x +122L
    E 300 T Turbo-D 600 L 67 L to 1 s 8.6x 200x +122L
    E 320 T 4-matic 600 L 69 L to 1 s 8.6x 188x +122L
    E 320 T 600 L 72 L to 1 s 8.6x 188x +122L
    E 430 4-matic 600 L 88 L to 1 s 8.6x 141x +122L
    AMG E 55 T 600 L 107 L to 1 s 8.6x 110x +122L
    E 430 T 600 L 91 L to 1 s 8.6x 141x +122L
    Vehicle E 200 T
    Trunk space 600 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 52 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 300x
    Difference with world average +122L
    Vehicle E 220 CDI
    Trunk space 600 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 58 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 279x
    Difference with world average +122L
    Vehicle E 240 T
    Trunk space 600 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 60 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 250x
    Difference with world average +122L
    Vehicle E 250 T D
    Trunk space 530 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 34 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 212x
    Difference with world average +52L
    Vehicle E 230 T
    Trunk space 600 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 57 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 261x
    Difference with world average +122L
    Vehicle E 270 CDI
    Trunk space 600 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 67 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 223x
    Difference with world average +122L
    Vehicle E 280 T 4-matic
    Trunk space 600 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 62 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 214x
    Difference with world average +122L
    Vehicle E 280 T
    Trunk space 600 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 67 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 214x
    Difference with world average +122L
    Vehicle E 290 T Turbo-D
    Trunk space 600 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 52 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 209x
    Difference with world average +122L
    Vehicle E 320 CDI
    Trunk space 600 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 71 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 186x
    Difference with world average +122L
    Vehicle E 300 T Turbo-D
    Trunk space 600 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 67 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 200x
    Difference with world average +122L
    Vehicle E 320 T 4-matic
    Trunk space 600 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 69 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 188x
    Difference with world average +122L
    Vehicle E 320 T
    Trunk space 600 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 72 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 188x
    Difference with world average +122L
    Vehicle E 430 4-matic
    Trunk space 600 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 88 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 141x
    Difference with world average +122L
    Vehicle AMG E 55 T
    Trunk space 600 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 107 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 110x
    Difference with world average +122L
    Vehicle E 430 T
    Trunk space 600 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 91 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 141x
    Difference with world average +122L

    Quick notes on Mercedes-Benz E-class trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 516 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 11.5 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 5.2 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 103.2 L
      • Max trunk load: 94 kg
      • Interior transformation: limited
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.7 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.7 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • E 280 : 2.6 L/hp (3.5 L/kW)
  • E 200 : 3.8 L/hp (5.2 L/kW)
  • E 200 CDI : 4.5 L/hp (6.1 L/kW)
  • E 220 CDI : 3.6 L/hp (5 L/kW)
  • E 220 D : 5.5 L/hp (7.4 L/kW)
  • E 200 Kompressor : 2.8 L/hp (3.8 L/kW)
  • E 230 : 3.5 L/hp (4.7 L/kW)
  • E 240 : 2.9 L/hp (4 L/kW)
  • E 270 CDI : 3.1 L/hp (4.2 L/kW)
  • E 280 4-matic : 2.5 L/hp (3.5 L/kW)
  • E 300 D : 3.8 L/hp (5.2 L/kW)
  • E 290 Turbo-D : 4 L/hp (5.5 L/kW)
  • E 300 Turbo-D : 2.9 L/hp (4 L/kW)
  • E 300 TD : 2.9 L/hp (4 L/kW)
  • E 320 : 2.3 L/hp (3.1 L/kW)
  • E 320 CDI : 2.6 L/hp (3.6 L/kW)
  • E 420 : 1.8 L/hp (2.4 L/kW)
  • E 320 4-matic : 2.3 L/hp (3.2 L/kW)
  • E 430 : 1.9 L/hp (2.5 L/kW)
  • AMG E 50 : 1.4 L/hp (2 L/kW)
  • E 430 4-matic : 1.9 L/hp (2.5 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • E 280 : 2.17 L/km-h (1.35 L/mph)
  • E 200 : 2.54 L/km-h (1.58 L/mph)
  • E 200 CDI : 2.61 L/km-h (1.62 L/mph)
  • E 220 CDI : 2.44 L/km-h (1.52 L/mph)
  • E 220 D : 2.89 L/km-h (1.8 L/mph)
  • E 200 Kompressor : 2.25 L/km-h (1.4 L/mph)
  • E 230 : 2.42 L/km-h (1.5 L/mph)
  • E 240 : 2.33 L/km-h (1.45 L/mph)
  • E 270 CDI : 2.32 L/km-h (1.44 L/mph)
  • E 280 4-matic : 2.3 L/km-h (1.43 L/mph)
  • E 300 D : 2.54 L/km-h (1.58 L/mph)
  • E 290 Turbo-D : 2.67 L/km-h (1.66 L/mph)
  • E 300 Turbo-D : 2.6 L/km-h (1.62 L/mph)
  • E 300 TD : 2.57 L/km-h (1.6 L/mph)
  • E 320 : 2.13 L/km-h (1.32 L/mph)
  • E 320 CDI : 2.26 L/km-h (1.4 L/mph)
  • E 420 : 2 L/km-h (1.24 L/mph)
  • E 320 4-matic : 2.26 L/km-h (1.4 L/mph)
  • E 430 : 2.08 L/km-h (1.29 L/mph)
  • AMG E 50 : 2 L/km-h (1.24 L/mph)
  • E 430 4-matic : 2.08 L/km-h (1.29 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • E 280 : 48.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 200 : 63.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 220 D : 78.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 230 : 53.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 300 D : 70.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 290 Turbo-D : 73.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 300 TD : 65.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 320 : 48.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 320 CDI : 56.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 420 : 46.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 430 : 48.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • AMG E 50 : 41.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 430 4-matic : 42.3x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    E 280 500 L 58 L to 1 s 6.3x 179x +22L
    E 200 520 L 48 L to 1 s 8x 260x +42L
    E 200 CDI 520 L 44 L to 1 s 8x 242x +42L
    E 220 CDI 520 L 53 L to 1 s 8x 242x +42L
    E 220 D 520 L 32 L to 1 s 8x 241x +42L
    E 200 Kompressor 520 L 61 L to 1 s 8x 260x +42L
    E 230 520 L 52 L to 1 s 8x 227x +42L
    E 240 520 L 57 L to 1 s 8x 200x +42L
    E 270 CDI 520 L 56 L to 1 s 8x 194x +42L
    E 280 4-matic 520 L 60 L to 1 s 6.5x 186x +42L
    E 300 D 520 L 42 L to 1 s 8x 174x +42L
    E 290 Turbo-D 520 L 48 L to 1 s 8x 181x +42L
    E 300 Turbo-D 520 L 61 L to 1 s 8x 174x +42L
    E 300 TD 520 L 50 L to 1 s 7.4x 174x +42L
    E 320 500 L 68 L to 1 s 6.3x 156x +22L
    E 320 CDI 520 L 68 L to 1 s 8x 161x +42L
    E 420 500 L 75 L to 1 s 6.3x 119x +22L
    E 320 4-matic 520 L 68 L to 1 s 6.5x 163x +42L
    E 430 520 L 91 L to 1 s 6.5x 122x +42L
    AMG E 50 500 L 85 L to 1 s 6.3x 101x +22L
    E 430 4-matic 520 L 80 L to 1 s 6.5x 122x +42L
    Vehicle E 280
    Trunk space 500 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 58 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 179x
    Difference with world average +22L
    Vehicle E 200
    Trunk space 520 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 48 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 260x
    Difference with world average +42L
    Vehicle E 200 CDI
    Trunk space 520 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 44 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 242x
    Difference with world average +42L
    Vehicle E 220 CDI
    Trunk space 520 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 53 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 242x
    Difference with world average +42L
    Vehicle E 220 D
    Trunk space 520 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 32 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 241x
    Difference with world average +42L
    Vehicle E 200 Kompressor
    Trunk space 520 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 61 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 260x
    Difference with world average +42L
    Vehicle E 230
    Trunk space 520 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 52 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 227x
    Difference with world average +42L
    Vehicle E 240
    Trunk space 520 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 57 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 200x
    Difference with world average +42L
    Vehicle E 270 CDI
    Trunk space 520 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 56 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 194x
    Difference with world average +42L
    Vehicle E 280 4-matic
    Trunk space 520 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 60 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 186x
    Difference with world average +42L
    Vehicle E 300 D
    Trunk space 520 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 42 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 174x
    Difference with world average +42L
    Vehicle E 290 Turbo-D
    Trunk space 520 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 48 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 181x
    Difference with world average +42L
    Vehicle E 300 Turbo-D
    Trunk space 520 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 61 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 174x
    Difference with world average +42L
    Vehicle E 300 TD
    Trunk space 520 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 50 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 174x
    Difference with world average +42L
    Vehicle E 320
    Trunk space 500 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 68 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 156x
    Difference with world average +22L
    Vehicle E 320 CDI
    Trunk space 520 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 68 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 161x
    Difference with world average +42L
    Vehicle E 420
    Trunk space 500 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 75 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 119x
    Difference with world average +22L
    Vehicle E 320 4-matic
    Trunk space 520 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 68 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 163x
    Difference with world average +42L
    Vehicle E 430
    Trunk space 520 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 91 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 122x
    Difference with world average +42L
    Vehicle AMG E 50
    Trunk space 500 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 85 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 101x
    Difference with world average +22L
    Vehicle E 430 4-matic
    Trunk space 520 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 80 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 122x
    Difference with world average +42L

    Quick notes on Mercedes-Benz E-class trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 498 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 11.1 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 5 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 99.6 L
      • Max trunk load: 98 kg
      • Interior transformation: limited
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.5 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.7 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 320 E : 2.4 L/hp (3.2 L/kW)
  • E 200 : 3.8 L/hp (5.2 L/kW)
  • E 220 : 3.5 L/hp (4.7 L/kW)
  • E 200 D : 6.9 L/hp (9.5 L/kW)
  • E 250 D Lang : 3.5 L/hp (4.7 L/kW)
  • E 280 : 2.7 L/hp (3.7 L/kW)
  • E 300 4-matic : 2.9 L/hp (3.9 L/kW)
  • E 280 long : 2 L/hp (2.7 L/kW)
  • E 300 Turbo-D : 3.5 L/hp (4.8 L/kW)
  • E 300 D : 3.8 L/hp (5.2 L/kW)
  • E 300 Turbo-D 4-matic : 3.5 L/hp (4.8 L/kW)
  • E 320 : 2.4 L/hp (3.2 L/kW)
  • E 420 : 1.8 L/hp (2.5 L/kW)
  • 500E : 1.5 L/hp (2 L/kW)
  • E 500 : 1.5 L/hp (2.1 L/kW)
  • AMG E 60 : 1.3 L/hp (1.8 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 320 E : 2.21 L/km-h (1.37 L/mph)
  • E 200 : 2.6 L/km-h (1.62 L/mph)
  • E 220 : 2.48 L/km-h (1.54 L/mph)
  • E 200 D : 3.25 L/km-h (2.02 L/mph)
  • E 250 D Lang : 2.17 L/km-h (1.35 L/mph)
  • E 280 : 2.26 L/km-h (1.4 L/mph)
  • E 300 4-matic : 2.4 L/km-h (1.49 L/mph)
  • E 280 long : 1.81 L/km-h (1.12 L/mph)
  • E 300 Turbo-D : 2.57 L/km-h (1.6 L/mph)
  • E 300 D : 2.6 L/km-h (1.62 L/mph)
  • E 300 Turbo-D 4-matic : 2.63 L/km-h (1.63 L/mph)
  • E 320 : 2.21 L/km-h (1.37 L/mph)
  • E 420 : 2.08 L/km-h (1.29 L/mph)
  • 500E : 1.94 L/km-h (1.21 L/mph)
  • E 500 : 1.94 L/km-h (1.21 L/mph)
  • AMG E 60 : 2 L/km-h (1.24 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 320 E : 47.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 200 : 60.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 220 : 59.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 200 D : 77.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 250 D Lang : 48.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 280 : 41.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 300 4-matic : 46x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 280 long : 33.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 300 Turbo-D : 65.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 300 D : 70.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 300 Turbo-D 4-matic : 59.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 320 : 47.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 420 : 44.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 500E : 37.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 500 : 37.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • AMG E 60 : 42x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    320 E 520 L 66 L to 1 s 7.4x 163x +42L
    E 200 520 L 48 L to 1 s 7.4x 260x +42L
    E 220 520 L 51 L to 1 s 7.4x 236x +42L
    E 200 D 520 L 30 L to 1 s 7.4x 260x +42L
    E 250 D Lang 390 L 23 L to 1 s 5.4x 156x -88L
    E 280 520 L 60 L to 1 s 7.4x 186x +42L
    E 300 4-matic 520 L 60 L to 1 s 7.4x 176x +42L
    E 280 long 390 L - 5.4x 139x -88L
    E 300 Turbo-D 520 L 50 L to 1 s 7.4x 174x +42L
    E 300 D 520 L 43 L to 1 s 7.4x 174x +42L
    E 300 Turbo-D 4-matic 520 L 46 L to 1 s 7.4x 174x +42L
    E 320 520 L 66 L to 1 s 7.4x 163x +42L
    E 420 520 L 76 L to 1 s 7.4x 124x +42L
    500E 485 L 81 L to 1 s 5.4x 98x +7L
    E 500 485 L 84 L to 1 s 5.4x 98x +7L
    AMG E 60 500 L 98 L to 1 s 5.6x 84x +22L
    Vehicle 320 E
    Trunk space 520 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 66 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 163x
    Difference with world average +42L
    Vehicle E 200
    Trunk space 520 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 48 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 260x
    Difference with world average +42L
    Vehicle E 220
    Trunk space 520 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 51 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 236x
    Difference with world average +42L
    Vehicle E 200 D
    Trunk space 520 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 30 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 260x
    Difference with world average +42L
    Vehicle E 250 D Lang
    Trunk space 390 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 23 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 156x
    Difference with world average -88L
    Vehicle E 280
    Trunk space 520 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 60 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 186x
    Difference with world average +42L
    Vehicle E 300 4-matic
    Trunk space 520 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 60 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 176x
    Difference with world average +42L
    Vehicle E 280 long
    Trunk space 390 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 5.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 139x
    Difference with world average -88L
    Vehicle E 300 Turbo-D
    Trunk space 520 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 50 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 174x
    Difference with world average +42L
    Vehicle E 300 D
    Trunk space 520 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 43 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 174x
    Difference with world average +42L
    Vehicle E 300 Turbo-D 4-matic
    Trunk space 520 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 46 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 174x
    Difference with world average +42L
    Vehicle E 320
    Trunk space 520 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 66 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 163x
    Difference with world average +42L
    Vehicle E 420
    Trunk space 520 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 76 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 124x
    Difference with world average +42L
    Vehicle 500E
    Trunk space 485 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 81 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 98x
    Difference with world average +7L
    Vehicle E 500
    Trunk space 485 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 84 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 98x
    Difference with world average +7L
    Vehicle AMG E 60
    Trunk space 500 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 98 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 84x
    Difference with world average +22L

    Quick notes on Mercedes-Benz E-class trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 480 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 10.7 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 4.8 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 120 L
      • Max trunk load: 85 kg
      • Interior transformation: none
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.8 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 2 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • E 200 : 3.5 L/hp (4.8 L/kW)
  • E 220 : 3.2 L/hp (4.4 L/kW)
  • E 320 : 2.2 L/hp (3 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • E 200 : 2.4 L/km-h (1.49 L/mph)
  • E 220 : 2.29 L/km-h (1.42 L/mph)
  • E 320 : 2.04 L/km-h (1.27 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • E 200 : 37.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 220 : 53.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 320 : 43.6x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    E 200 480 L 44 L to 1 s 6.9x 240x +2L
    E 220 480 L 48 L to 1 s 6.9x 218x +2L
    E 320 480 L 61 L to 1 s 6.9x 150x +2L
    Vehicle E 200
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 44 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 240x
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle E 220
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 48 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 218x
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle E 320
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 61 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 150x
    Difference with world average +2L

    Quick notes on Mercedes-Benz E-class trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 300 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 6.7 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 3 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 75 L
      • Max trunk load: 101 kg
      • Interior transformation: none
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 1.8 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.3 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 4 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • E 200 : 2.2 L/hp (3 L/kW)
  • E 220 : 2 L/hp (2.7 L/kW)
  • E 320 : 1.4 L/hp (1.9 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • E 200 : 1.5 L/km-h (0.93 L/mph)
  • E 220 : 1.43 L/km-h (0.89 L/mph)
  • E 320 : 1.28 L/km-h (0.8 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • E 200 : 34.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 220 : 33.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 320 : 26.1x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    E 200 300 L 24 L to 1 s 4.3x 150x -178L
    E 220 300 L 27 L to 1 s 4.3x 136x -178L
    E 320 300 L 34 L to 1 s 4.3x 94x -178L
    Vehicle E 200
    Trunk space 300 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 24 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 150x
    Difference with world average -178L
    Vehicle E 220
    Trunk space 300 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 27 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 136x
    Difference with world average -178L
    Vehicle E 320
    Trunk space 300 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 34 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 94x
    Difference with world average -178L

    Quick notes on Mercedes-Benz E-class trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 530 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 11.8 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 5.3 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 106 L
      • Max trunk load: 94 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 3.4 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 2.2 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • E 200 T : 3.9 L/hp (5.3 L/kW)
  • E 220 T : 3.5 L/hp (4.8 L/kW)
  • E 280 T : 2.7 L/hp (3.7 L/kW)
  • E 250 T D : 4.7 L/hp (6.4 L/kW)
  • E 300 T 4-matic : 2.9 L/hp (4 L/kW)
  • E 300 T D : 3.9 L/hp (5.3 L/kW)
  • E 300 T Turbo-D : 3.6 L/hp (4.9 L/kW)
  • E 300 T Turbo-D 4-matic : 3.6 L/hp (4.9 L/kW)
  • E 320 T : 2.4 L/hp (3.3 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • E 200 T : 2.82 L/km-h (1.75 L/mph)
  • E 220 T : 2.68 L/km-h (1.67 L/mph)
  • E 280 T : 2.43 L/km-h (1.51 L/mph)
  • E 250 T D : 2.94 L/km-h (1.83 L/mph)
  • E 300 T 4-matic : 2.6 L/km-h (1.62 L/mph)
  • E 300 T D : 2.79 L/km-h (1.73 L/mph)
  • E 300 T Turbo-D : 2.72 L/km-h (1.69 L/mph)
  • E 300 T Turbo-D 4-matic : 2.72 L/km-h (1.69 L/mph)
  • E 320 T : 2.36 L/km-h (1.47 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • E 200 T : 57.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 220 T : 55.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 280 T : 47.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 250 T D : 69.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 300 T 4-matic : 43.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 300 T D : 67.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 300 T Turbo-D : 63.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 300 T Turbo-D 4-matic : 58.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • E 320 T : 45.7x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    E 200 T 530 L 46 L to 1 s 7.4x 265x +52L
    E 220 T 530 L 50 L to 1 s 7.4x 241x +52L
    E 280 T 530 L 60 L to 1 s 7.4x 189x +52L
    E 250 T D 530 L 34 L to 1 s 7.4x 212x +52L
    E 300 T 4-matic 530 L 57 L to 1 s 7.4x 179x +52L
    E 300 T D 530 L 41 L to 1 s 7.4x 177x +52L
    E 300 T Turbo-D 530 L 51 L to 1 s 7.4x 177x +52L
    E 300 T Turbo-D 4-matic 530 L 51 L to 1 s 7.4x 177x +52L
    E 320 T 530 L 65 L to 1 s 7.4x 166x +52L
    Vehicle E 200 T
    Trunk space 530 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 46 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 265x
    Difference with world average +52L
    Vehicle E 220 T
    Trunk space 530 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 50 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 241x
    Difference with world average +52L
    Vehicle E 280 T
    Trunk space 530 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 60 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 189x
    Difference with world average +52L
    Vehicle E 250 T D
    Trunk space 530 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 34 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 212x
    Difference with world average +52L
    Vehicle E 300 T 4-matic
    Trunk space 530 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 57 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 179x
    Difference with world average +52L
    Vehicle E 300 T D
    Trunk space 530 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 41 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 177x
    Difference with world average +52L
    Vehicle E 300 T Turbo-D
    Trunk space 530 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 51 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 177x
    Difference with world average +52L
    Vehicle E 300 T Turbo-D 4-matic
    Trunk space 530 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 51 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 177x
    Difference with world average +52L
    Vehicle E 320 T
    Trunk space 530 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 65 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 166x
    Difference with world average +52L