2016 E-class Coupe (C238)
2016 E-class (W213)
2017 E-class Cabrio (A238)
2016 E-class T-mod. (S213)
2017 E-class All-Terrain
2013 E-class Coupe (C207, facelift 2013)
2013 E-class T-mod. (S212, facelift 2013)
2013 E-class (W212, facelift 2013)
2013 E-class Cabrio (A207, facelift 2013)
2009 E-class Cabrio (A207)
2009 E-class (W212)
2009 E-class Coupe (C207)
2009 E-class T-mod. (S212)
2006 E-class (W211, facelift 2006)
2003 E-class T-mod. (S211)
2006 E-class T-mod. (S211, facelift 2006)
2002 E-class (W211)
1996 E-class T-mod. (S210)
1995 E-class (W210)
1993 E-class (W124)
1993 E-class Coupe (C124)
1993 E-class Cabrio (A124)
1993 E-class T-mod. (S124)
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
E 300 | 425 L | 70 L to 1 s | 6.4x | 213x | -53L |
E 200 | 425 L | 58 L to 1 s | 8.5x | 213x | -53L |
E 220d | 425 L | 59 L to 1 s | 8.5x | 218x | -53L |
E 400 | 425 L | 85 L to 1 s | 6.4x | 142x | -53L |
E 350d | 425 L | 75 L to 1 s | 8.5x | 142x | -53L |
E 400d | 425 L | 89 L to 1 s | 6.4x | 145x | -53L |
AMG E 53 | 425 L | 101 L to 1 s | 6.4x | 142x | -53L |
E 450 V6 | 425 L | 89 L to 1 s | 6.4x | 142x | -53L |
E 350 d | 425 L | 76 L to 1 s | 8.5x | 145x | -53L |
Vehicle | E 300 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 425 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 70 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 213x |
Difference with world average | -53L |
Vehicle | E 200 |
Trunk space | 425 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 58 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 213x |
Difference with world average | -53L |
Vehicle | E 220d |
Trunk space | 425 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 59 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 218x |
Difference with world average | -53L |
Vehicle | E 400 |
Trunk space | 425 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 85 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 142x |
Difference with world average | -53L |
Vehicle | E 350d |
Trunk space | 425 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 75 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 142x |
Difference with world average | -53L |
Vehicle | E 400d |
Trunk space | 425 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 89 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 145x |
Difference with world average | -53L |
Vehicle | AMG E 53 |
Trunk space | 425 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 101 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 142x |
Difference with world average | -53L |
Vehicle | E 450 V6 |
Trunk space | 425 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 89 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 142x |
Difference with world average | -53L |
Vehicle | E 350 d |
Trunk space | 425 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 76 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 145x |
Difference with world average | -53L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
E 200 | 540 L | 70 L to 1 s | 10.8x | 271x | +62L |
E 350d V6 | 540 L | 96 L to 1 s | 10.8x | 181x | +62L |
E 220d | 540 L | 76 L to 1 s | 10.8x | 277x | +62L |
E 250 | 540 L | 82 L to 1 s | 10.8x | 271x | +62L |
E 200d | 540 L | 68 L to 1 s | 10.8x | 277x | +62L |
E 300 | 540 L | 90 L to 1 s | 8.2x | 271x | +62L |
E 350e | 450 L | 76 L to 1 s | 9x | 226x | -28L |
AMG E 63 V8 | 540 L | 164 L to 1 s | 8.2x | 136x | +62L |
E 400 V6 | 540 L | 110 L to 1 s | 8.2x | 154x | +62L |
AMG E 63 S V8 | 540 L | 169 L to 1 s | 8.2x | 136x | +62L |
AMG E 53 | 540 L | 126 L to 1 s | 8.2x | 180x | +62L |
E 300 d | 540 L | 92 L to 1 s | 10.8x | 277x | +62L |
E 350d | 540 L | 100 L to 1 s | 10.8x | 185x | +62L |
E 350 | 540 L | 96 L to 1 s | 8.2x | 271x | +62L |
E 450 V6 | 540 L | 102 L to 1 s | 8.2x | 180x | +62L |
Vehicle | E 200 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 70 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 271x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 350d V6 |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 96 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 181x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 220d |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 76 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 277x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 250 |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 82 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 271x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 200d |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 68 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 277x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 300 |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 90 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 271x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 350e |
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 76 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 226x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | AMG E 63 V8 |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 164 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 136x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 400 V6 |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 110 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 154x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | AMG E 63 S V8 |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 169 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 136x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | AMG E 53 |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 126 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 180x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 300 d |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 92 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 277x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 350d |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 100 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 185x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 350 |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 96 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 271x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 450 V6 |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 102 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 180x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
E 300 | 285 L | 45 L to 1 s | 4.3x | 143x | -193L |
E 220d | 310 L | 42 L to 1 s | 6.2x | 159x | -168L |
E 200 | 285 L | 38 L to 1 s | 5.7x | 143x | -193L |
E 400 | 310 L | 60 L to 1 s | 4.7x | 103x | -168L |
E 350d | 310 L | 54 L to 1 s | 6.2x | 106x | -168L |
E 400d | 385 L | 79 L to 1 s | 5.8x | 132x | -93L |
AMG E 53 | 385 L | 90 L to 1 s | 5.8x | 128x | -93L |
E 450 V6 | 310 L | - | 4.7x | 103x | -168L |
Vehicle | E 300 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 285 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 45 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 143x |
Difference with world average | -193L |
Vehicle | E 220d |
Trunk space | 310 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 42 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 159x |
Difference with world average | -168L |
Vehicle | E 200 |
Trunk space | 285 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 38 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 143x |
Difference with world average | -193L |
Vehicle | E 400 |
Trunk space | 310 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 60 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 103x |
Difference with world average | -168L |
Vehicle | E 350d |
Trunk space | 310 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 54 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 106x |
Difference with world average | -168L |
Vehicle | E 400d |
Trunk space | 385 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 79 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 132x |
Difference with world average | -93L |
Vehicle | AMG E 53 |
Trunk space | 385 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 90 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 128x |
Difference with world average | -93L |
Vehicle | E 450 V6 |
Trunk space | 310 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 103x |
Difference with world average | -168L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
E 220d | 640 L | 88 L to 1 s | 12.8x | 328x | +162L |
E 200 | 640 L | 86 L to 1 s | 12.8x | 321x | +162L |
E 250 | 640 L | 94 L to 1 s | 12.8x | 321x | +162L |
E 400 | 640 L | 125 L to 1 s | 9.7x | 183x | +162L |
AMG E 43 | 640 L | 142 L to 1 s | 9.7x | 214x | +162L |
E 350d | 640 L | 112 L to 1 s | 12.8x | 214x | +162L |
AMG E 63 V8 | 640 L | 188 L to 1 s | 9.7x | 161x | +162L |
AMG E 63 S V8 | 640 L | 188 L to 1 s | 9.7x | 161x | +162L |
AMG E 53 | 640 L | 149 L to 1 s | 9.7x | 213x | +162L |
E 300d | 640 L | 103 L to 1 s | 12.8x | 328x | +162L |
E 300 | 640 L | 103 L to 1 s | 9.7x | 321x | +162L |
E 450 V6 | 640 L | 128 L to 1 s | 9.7x | 214x | +162L |
Vehicle | E 220d |
---|---|
Trunk space | 640 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 88 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 12.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 328x |
Difference with world average | +162L |
Vehicle | E 200 |
Trunk space | 640 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 86 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 12.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 321x |
Difference with world average | +162L |
Vehicle | E 250 |
Trunk space | 640 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 94 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 12.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 321x |
Difference with world average | +162L |
Vehicle | E 400 |
Trunk space | 640 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 125 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 183x |
Difference with world average | +162L |
Vehicle | AMG E 43 |
Trunk space | 640 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 142 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 214x |
Difference with world average | +162L |
Vehicle | E 350d |
Trunk space | 640 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 112 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 12.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 214x |
Difference with world average | +162L |
Vehicle | AMG E 63 V8 |
Trunk space | 640 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 188 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 161x |
Difference with world average | +162L |
Vehicle | AMG E 63 S V8 |
Trunk space | 640 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 188 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 161x |
Difference with world average | +162L |
Vehicle | AMG E 53 |
Trunk space | 640 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 149 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 213x |
Difference with world average | +162L |
Vehicle | E 300d |
Trunk space | 640 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 103 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 12.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 328x |
Difference with world average | +162L |
Vehicle | E 300 |
Trunk space | 640 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 103 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 321x |
Difference with world average | +162L |
Vehicle | E 450 V6 |
Trunk space | 640 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 128 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 214x |
Difference with world average | +162L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
E 220d | 670 L | 88 L to 1 s | 13.4x | 344x | +192L |
E 350d V6 | 670 L | 114 L to 1 s | 13.4x | 224x | +192L |
E 400d | 640 L | 125 L to 1 s | 9.7x | 219x | +162L |
Vehicle | E 220d |
---|---|
Trunk space | 670 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 88 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 13.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 344x |
Difference with world average | +192L |
Vehicle | E 350d V6 |
Trunk space | 670 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 114 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 13.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 224x |
Difference with world average | +192L |
Vehicle | E 400d |
Trunk space | 640 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 125 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 219x |
Difference with world average | +162L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
E 220 CDI | 450 L | 57 L to 1 s | 6.8x | 210x | -28L |
E 350 BlueTEC | 450 L | 74 L to 1 s | 6.8x | 151x | -28L |
E 250 CDI | 450 L | 64 L to 1 s | 6.8x | 210x | -28L |
E 350 4MATIC | 450 L | 73 L to 1 s | 6.8x | 129x | -28L |
E 250 | 450 L | 67 L to 1 s | 6.8x | 226x | -28L |
E 350 | 450 L | 76 L to 1 s | 6.8x | 129x | -28L |
E 300 | 450 L | 68 L to 1 s | 6.8x | 129x | -28L |
E 200 | 450 L | 61 L to 1 s | 6.8x | 226x | -28L |
E 500 | 450 L | 98 L to 1 s | 6.8x | 97x | -28L |
E 400 | 450 L | 92 L to 1 s | 6.8x | 150x | -28L |
Vehicle | E 220 CDI |
---|---|
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 57 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 210x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | E 350 BlueTEC |
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 74 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 151x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | E 250 CDI |
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 64 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 210x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | E 350 4MATIC |
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 73 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 129x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | E 250 |
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 67 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 226x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | E 350 |
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 76 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 129x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | E 300 |
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 68 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 129x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | E 200 |
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 61 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 226x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | E 500 |
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 98 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 97x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | E 400 |
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 92 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 150x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
E 200 | 695 L | 88 L to 1 s | 11.8x | 349x | +217L |
E 220 CDI | 695 L | 85 L to 1 s | 11.8x | 324x | +217L |
E 250 CDI | 695 L | 94 L to 1 s | 11.8x | 324x | +217L |
E 300 | 695 L | 94 L to 1 s | 11.8x | 199x | +217L |
E 250 | 695 L | 94 L to 1 s | 11.8x | 349x | +217L |
E 350 BlueTEC | 600 L | 90 L to 1 s | 10.2x | 201x | +122L |
E 300 BlueTEC | 695 L | 99 L to 1 s | 11.8x | 233x | +217L |
E 500 | 695 L | 148 L to 1 s | 8.7x | 149x | +217L |
E 350 | 695 L | 109 L to 1 s | 11.8x | 199x | +217L |
E 400 | 695 L | 136 L to 1 s | 11.8x | 232x | +217L |
AMG E 63 | 695 L | 193 L to 1 s | 10.5x | 127x | +217L |
Vehicle | E 200 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 695 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 88 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 349x |
Difference with world average | +217L |
Vehicle | E 220 CDI |
Trunk space | 695 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 85 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 324x |
Difference with world average | +217L |
Vehicle | E 250 CDI |
Trunk space | 695 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 94 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 324x |
Difference with world average | +217L |
Vehicle | E 300 |
Trunk space | 695 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 94 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 199x |
Difference with world average | +217L |
Vehicle | E 250 |
Trunk space | 695 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 94 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 349x |
Difference with world average | +217L |
Vehicle | E 350 BlueTEC |
Trunk space | 600 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 90 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 201x |
Difference with world average | +122L |
Vehicle | E 300 BlueTEC |
Trunk space | 695 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 99 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 233x |
Difference with world average | +217L |
Vehicle | E 500 |
Trunk space | 695 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 148 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 149x |
Difference with world average | +217L |
Vehicle | E 350 |
Trunk space | 695 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 109 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 199x |
Difference with world average | +217L |
Vehicle | E 400 |
Trunk space | 695 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 136 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 232x |
Difference with world average | +217L |
Vehicle | AMG E 63 |
Trunk space | 695 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 193 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 127x |
Difference with world average | +217L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
E 250 CDI | 540 L | 76 L to 1 s | 9.2x | 252x | +62L |
E 200 CDI | 540 L | 60 L to 1 s | 9.2x | 252x | +62L |
E 220 | 540 L | 68 L to 1 s | 9.2x | 252x | +62L |
E 220 CDI | 540 L | 68 L to 1 s | 9.2x | 252x | +62L |
E 350 BlueTEC | 540 L | 84 L to 1 s | 9.2x | 181x | +62L |
E 300 | 540 L | 81 L to 1 s | 9.2x | 154x | +62L |
E 250 | 540 L | 77 L to 1 s | 9.2x | 271x | +62L |
E 200 | 540 L | 72 L to 1 s | 9.2x | 271x | +62L |
AMG E 63 | 540 L | 135 L to 1 s | 8.2x | 99x | +62L |
E 500 4MATIC | 540 L | 117 L to 1 s | 6.8x | 116x | +62L |
E 400 4MATIC | 540 L | 108 L to 1 s | 9.2x | 180x | +62L |
E 500 | 540 L | 115 L to 1 s | 6.8x | 116x | +62L |
E 400 | 540 L | 108 L to 1 s | 9.2x | 180x | +62L |
E 350 4MATIC | 540 L | 86 L to 1 s | 9.2x | 154x | +62L |
E 350 | 540 L | 90 L to 1 s | 9.2x | 154x | +62L |
E 300 4MATIC | 540 L | 77 L to 1 s | 9.2x | 154x | +62L |
Vehicle | E 250 CDI |
---|---|
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 76 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 252x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 200 CDI |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 60 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 252x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 220 |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 68 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 252x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 220 CDI |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 68 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 252x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 350 BlueTEC |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 84 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 181x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 300 |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 81 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 154x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 250 |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 77 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 271x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 200 |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 72 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 271x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | AMG E 63 |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 135 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 99x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 500 4MATIC |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 117 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 116x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 400 4MATIC |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 108 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 180x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 500 |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 115 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 116x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 400 |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 108 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 180x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 350 4MATIC |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 86 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 154x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 350 |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 90 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 154x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 300 4MATIC |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 77 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 154x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
E 220 CDI | 300 L | 36 L to 1 s | 4.5x | 140x | -178L |
E 250 CDI | 300 L | 41 L to 1 s | 4.5x | 140x | -178L |
E 200 | 300 L | 38 L to 1 s | 4.5x | 151x | -178L |
E 350 | 300 L | 49 L to 1 s | 4.5x | 86x | -178L |
E 500 | 300 L | 64 L to 1 s | 4.5x | 64x | -178L |
E 400 | 390 L | 78 L to 1 s | 5.9x | 130x | -88L |
E 250 | 390 L | 55 L to 1 s | 5.9x | 196x | -88L |
E 300 | 300 L | 44 L to 1 s | 4.5x | 86x | -178L |
Vehicle | E 220 CDI |
---|---|
Trunk space | 300 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 36 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 140x |
Difference with world average | -178L |
Vehicle | E 250 CDI |
Trunk space | 300 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 41 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 140x |
Difference with world average | -178L |
Vehicle | E 200 |
Trunk space | 300 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 38 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 151x |
Difference with world average | -178L |
Vehicle | E 350 |
Trunk space | 300 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 49 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 86x |
Difference with world average | -178L |
Vehicle | E 500 |
Trunk space | 300 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 64 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 64x |
Difference with world average | -178L |
Vehicle | E 400 |
Trunk space | 390 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 78 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 130x |
Difference with world average | -88L |
Vehicle | E 250 |
Trunk space | 390 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 55 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 196x |
Difference with world average | -88L |
Vehicle | E 300 |
Trunk space | 300 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 44 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 86x |
Difference with world average | -178L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
E 200 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY | 300 L | 36 L to 1 s | 4.5x | 167x | -178L |
E 250 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY | 300 L | 41 L to 1 s | 4.5x | 140x | -178L |
E 220 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY | 300 L | 36 L to 1 s | 4.5x | 140x | -178L |
E 350 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY | 300 L | 45 L to 1 s | 4.5x | 100x | -178L |
E 250 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY | 300 L | 41 L to 1 s | 4.5x | 167x | -178L |
E 350 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY | 300 L | 46 L to 1 s | 4.5x | 86x | -178L |
E 500 | 300 L | 60 L to 1 s | 4.5x | 55x | -178L |
Vehicle | E 200 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY |
---|---|
Trunk space | 300 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 36 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 167x |
Difference with world average | -178L |
Vehicle | E 250 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY |
Trunk space | 300 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 41 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 140x |
Difference with world average | -178L |
Vehicle | E 220 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY |
Trunk space | 300 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 36 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 140x |
Difference with world average | -178L |
Vehicle | E 350 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY |
Trunk space | 300 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 45 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 100x |
Difference with world average | -178L |
Vehicle | E 250 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY |
Trunk space | 300 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 41 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 167x |
Difference with world average | -178L |
Vehicle | E 350 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY |
Trunk space | 300 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 46 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 86x |
Difference with world average | -178L |
Vehicle | E 500 |
Trunk space | 300 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 60 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 55x |
Difference with world average | -178L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
E 200 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY | 540 L | 65 L to 1 s | 9.2x | 301x | +62L |
E 250 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY | 540 L | 69 L to 1 s | 9.2x | 252x | +62L |
E 220 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY | 540 L | 63 L to 1 s | 9.2x | 252x | +62L |
E 200 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY | 540 L | 53 L to 1 s | 9.2x | 252x | +62L |
E 350 CDI 4MATIC BlueEFFICIENCY | 540 L | 89 L to 1 s | 6.8x | 181x | +62L |
E 350 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY | 540 L | 82 L to 1 s | 6.8x | 181x | +62L |
E 350 BlueTEC | 540 L | - | 6.8x | 181x | +62L |
E 350 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY | 540 L | 90 L to 1 s | 6.8x | 155x | +62L |
E 250 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY | 540 L | 73 L to 1 s | 9.2x | 301x | +62L |
E 350 4MATIC BlueEFFICIENCY | 540 L | 89 L to 1 s | 6.8x | 155x | +62L |
Vehicle | E 200 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY |
---|---|
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 65 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 301x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 250 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 69 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 252x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 220 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 63 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 252x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 200 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 53 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 252x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 350 CDI 4MATIC BlueEFFICIENCY |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 89 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 181x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 350 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 82 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 181x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 350 BlueTEC |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 181x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 350 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 90 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 155x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 250 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 73 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 301x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 350 4MATIC BlueEFFICIENCY |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 89 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 155x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
E 200 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY | 450 L | 56 L to 1 s | 6.8x | 210x | -28L |
E 220 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY | 450 L | 56 L to 1 s | 6.8x | 210x | -28L |
E 250 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY | 450 L | 64 L to 1 s | 6.8x | 210x | -28L |
E 250 CDI | 450 L | 66 L to 1 s | 6.8x | 210x | -28L |
E 250 CGI | 450 L | 58 L to 1 s | 6.8x | 251x | -28L |
E 350 CGI | 450 L | 75 L to 1 s | 6.8x | 129x | -28L |
E 350 CDI | 450 L | 78 L to 1 s | 6.8x | 151x | -28L |
E 500 | 450 L | 92 L to 1 s | 6.8x | 82x | -28L |
E 250 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY | 450 L | 64 L to 1 s | 6.8x | 251x | -28L |
E 350 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY | 450 L | 70 L to 1 s | 6.8x | 151x | -28L |
E 350 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY | 450 L | 75 L to 1 s | 6.8x | 129x | -28L |
Vehicle | E 200 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY |
---|---|
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 56 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 210x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | E 220 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY |
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 56 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 210x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | E 250 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY |
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 64 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 210x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | E 250 CDI |
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 66 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 210x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | E 250 CGI |
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 58 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 251x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | E 350 CGI |
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 75 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 129x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | E 350 CDI |
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 78 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 151x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | E 500 |
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 92 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 82x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | E 250 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY |
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 64 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 251x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | E 350 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY |
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 70 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 151x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | E 350 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY |
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 75 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 129x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
E 200 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY | 695 L | 84 L to 1 s | 11.8x | 387x | +217L |
E 250 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY | 695 L | 94 L to 1 s | 11.8x | 387x | +217L |
E 200 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY | 695 L | 84 L to 1 s | 11.8x | 387x | +217L |
E 220 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY | 695 L | 83 L to 1 s | 11.8x | 387x | +217L |
E 250 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY | 695 L | 87 L to 1 s | 11.8x | 387x | +217L |
E 350 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY | 695 L | 102 L to 1 s | 8.7x | 233x | +217L |
E 350 CDI 4MATIC BlueEFFICIENCY | 695 L | 98 L to 1 s | 8.7x | 233x | +217L |
E 500 | 695 L | 136 L to 1 s | 8.7x | 127x | +217L |
E 350 4MATIC | 695 L | 98 L to 1 s | 8.7x | 199x | +217L |
E 350 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY | 695 L | 104 L to 1 s | 8.7x | 199x | +217L |
Vehicle | E 200 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY |
---|---|
Trunk space | 695 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 84 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 387x |
Difference with world average | +217L |
Vehicle | E 250 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY |
Trunk space | 695 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 94 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 387x |
Difference with world average | +217L |
Vehicle | E 200 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY |
Trunk space | 695 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 84 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 387x |
Difference with world average | +217L |
Vehicle | E 220 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY |
Trunk space | 695 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 83 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 387x |
Difference with world average | +217L |
Vehicle | E 250 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY |
Trunk space | 695 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 87 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 387x |
Difference with world average | +217L |
Vehicle | E 350 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY |
Trunk space | 695 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 102 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 233x |
Difference with world average | +217L |
Vehicle | E 350 CDI 4MATIC BlueEFFICIENCY |
Trunk space | 695 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 98 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 233x |
Difference with world average | +217L |
Vehicle | E 500 |
Trunk space | 695 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 136 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 127x |
Difference with world average | +217L |
Vehicle | E 350 4MATIC |
Trunk space | 695 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 98 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 199x |
Difference with world average | +217L |
Vehicle | E 350 CGI BlueEFFICIENCY |
Trunk space | 695 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 104 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 199x |
Difference with world average | +217L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
E 280 V6 | 540 L | 73 L to 1 s | 6.8x | 180x | +62L |
E 320 CDI V6 | 540 L | 83 L to 1 s | 6.8x | 181x | +62L |
E 420 CDI V8 | 530 L | 91 L to 1 s | 6.6x | 133x | +52L |
E 300 BlueTec V6 | 625 L | 92 L to 1 s | - | 209x | +147L |
Vehicle | E 280 V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 73 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 180x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 320 CDI V6 |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 83 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 181x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 420 CDI V8 |
Trunk space | 530 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 91 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 133x |
Difference with world average | +52L |
Vehicle | E 300 BlueTec V6 |
Trunk space | 625 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 92 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | - |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 209x |
Difference with world average | +147L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
E 270 CDI | 690 L | 78 L to 1 s | 9.9x | 257x | +212L |
E 200 Kompressor | 690 L | 72 L to 1 s | 9.9x | 384x | +212L |
E 220 CDI | 690 L | 68 L to 1 s | 9.9x | 321x | +212L |
E 240 | 690 L | 78 L to 1 s | 9.9x | 266x | +212L |
E 200 CDI | 690 L | 68 L to 1 s | 9.9x | 321x | +212L |
E 230 | 690 L | 73 L to 1 s | 9.9x | 276x | +212L |
E 240 4 Matic | 690 L | 67 L to 1 s | 9.9x | 266x | +212L |
E 280 CDI | 690 L | 88 L to 1 s | 9.9x | 231x | +212L |
E 320 | 690 L | 100 L to 1 s | 9.9x | 216x | +212L |
E 320 4 Matic | 690 L | 90 L to 1 s | 8.6x | 216x | +212L |
E 320 CDI | 690 L | 88 L to 1 s | 9.9x | 214x | +212L |
E 350 | 690 L | 103 L to 1 s | 9.9x | 197x | +212L |
E 350 CGI | 690 L | 103 L to 1 s | 9.9x | 197x | +212L |
E 350 4Matic | 690 L | 99 L to 1 s | 9.9x | 197x | +212L |
E 500 | 690 L | 111 L to 1 s | 8.6x | 139x | +212L |
E 500 4Matic | 690 L | 106 L to 1 s | 8.6x | 139x | +212L |
AMG E 55 | 690 L | 150 L to 1 s | 8.6x | 127x | +212L |
E 550 4 matic | 690 L | 128 L to 1 s | 8.6x | 126x | +212L |
E 550 | 690 L | 135 L to 1 s | 8.6x | 126x | +212L |
Vehicle | E 270 CDI |
---|---|
Trunk space | 690 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 78 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 257x |
Difference with world average | +212L |
Vehicle | E 200 Kompressor |
Trunk space | 690 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 72 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 384x |
Difference with world average | +212L |
Vehicle | E 220 CDI |
Trunk space | 690 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 68 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 321x |
Difference with world average | +212L |
Vehicle | E 240 |
Trunk space | 690 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 78 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 266x |
Difference with world average | +212L |
Vehicle | E 200 CDI |
Trunk space | 690 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 68 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 321x |
Difference with world average | +212L |
Vehicle | E 230 |
Trunk space | 690 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 73 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 276x |
Difference with world average | +212L |
Vehicle | E 240 4 Matic |
Trunk space | 690 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 67 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 266x |
Difference with world average | +212L |
Vehicle | E 280 CDI |
Trunk space | 690 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 88 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 231x |
Difference with world average | +212L |
Vehicle | E 320 |
Trunk space | 690 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 100 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 216x |
Difference with world average | +212L |
Vehicle | E 320 4 Matic |
Trunk space | 690 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 90 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 216x |
Difference with world average | +212L |
Vehicle | E 320 CDI |
Trunk space | 690 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 88 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 214x |
Difference with world average | +212L |
Vehicle | E 350 |
Trunk space | 690 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 103 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 197x |
Difference with world average | +212L |
Vehicle | E 350 CGI |
Trunk space | 690 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 103 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 197x |
Difference with world average | +212L |
Vehicle | E 350 4Matic |
Trunk space | 690 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 99 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 197x |
Difference with world average | +212L |
Vehicle | E 500 |
Trunk space | 690 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 111 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 139x |
Difference with world average | +212L |
Vehicle | E 500 4Matic |
Trunk space | 690 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 106 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 139x |
Difference with world average | +212L |
Vehicle | AMG E 55 |
Trunk space | 690 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 150 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 127x |
Difference with world average | +212L |
Vehicle | E 550 4 matic |
Trunk space | 690 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 128 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 126x |
Difference with world average | +212L |
Vehicle | E 550 |
Trunk space | 690 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 135 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 126x |
Difference with world average | +212L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
E 200 Kompressor | 690 L | 77 L to 1 s | 9.9x | 384x | +212L |
E 220 CDI | 690 L | 80 L to 1 s | 9.9x | 321x | +212L |
E 280 V6 | 690 L | 87 L to 1 s | 9.9x | 230x | +212L |
E 280 CDI V6 | 690 L | 80 L to 1 s | 9.9x | 231x | +212L |
E 500 V8 | 690 L | 128 L to 1 s | 8.6x | 126x | +212L |
AMG E 63 V8 | 690 L | 157 L to 1 s | 8.6x | 111x | +212L |
E 320 CDI V6 | 690 L | 90 L to 1 s | 8.6x | 231x | +212L |
E 350 V6 | 690 L | 99 L to 1 s | 8.6x | 197x | +212L |
Vehicle | E 200 Kompressor |
---|---|
Trunk space | 690 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 77 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 384x |
Difference with world average | +212L |
Vehicle | E 220 CDI |
Trunk space | 690 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 80 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 321x |
Difference with world average | +212L |
Vehicle | E 280 V6 |
Trunk space | 690 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 87 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 230x |
Difference with world average | +212L |
Vehicle | E 280 CDI V6 |
Trunk space | 690 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 80 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 231x |
Difference with world average | +212L |
Vehicle | E 500 V8 |
Trunk space | 690 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 128 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 126x |
Difference with world average | +212L |
Vehicle | AMG E 63 V8 |
Trunk space | 690 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 157 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 111x |
Difference with world average | +212L |
Vehicle | E 320 CDI V6 |
Trunk space | 690 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 90 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 231x |
Difference with world average | +212L |
Vehicle | E 350 V6 |
Trunk space | 690 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 99 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 197x |
Difference with world average | +212L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
E 200 Kompressor | 540 L | 59 L to 1 s | 8.3x | 301x | +62L |
E 200 CDI | 540 L | 47 L to 1 s | 8.3x | 251x | +62L |
E 220 CDI | 540 L | 56 L to 1 s | 8.3x | 251x | +62L |
E 240 V6 | 540 L | 53 L to 1 s | 8.3x | 208x | +62L |
E 270 CDI | 540 L | 61 L to 1 s | 8.3x | 201x | +62L |
E 280 CDI V6 | 540 L | 75 L to 1 s | 8.3x | 181x | +62L |
E 320 V6 | 540 L | 72 L to 1 s | 6.8x | 169x | +62L |
E 320 CDI | 540 L | 74 L to 1 s | 8.3x | 168x | +62L |
E 350 V6 | 540 L | 81 L to 1 s | 6.8x | 154x | +62L |
E 400 CDI V8 | 540 L | 82 L to 1 s | 6.8x | 135x | +62L |
E 500 V8 | 540 L | 102 L to 1 s | 6.8x | 109x | +62L |
AMG E 55 V8 | 540 L | 120 L to 1 s | 6.8x | 99x | +62L |
E 320 CDI V6 | 540 L | 77 L to 1 s | 6.8x | 181x | +62L |
E 280 CDI | 540 L | 62 L to 1 s | 8.3x | 168x | +62L |
Vehicle | E 200 Kompressor |
---|---|
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 59 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 301x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 200 CDI |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 47 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 251x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 220 CDI |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 56 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 251x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 240 V6 |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 53 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 208x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 270 CDI |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 61 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 201x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 280 CDI V6 |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 75 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 181x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 320 V6 |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 72 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 169x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 320 CDI |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 74 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 168x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 350 V6 |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 81 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 154x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 400 CDI V8 |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 82 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 135x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 500 V8 |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 102 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 109x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | AMG E 55 V8 |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 120 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 99x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 320 CDI V6 |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 77 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 181x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | E 280 CDI |
Trunk space | 540 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 62 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 168x |
Difference with world average | +62L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
E 200 T | 600 L | 52 L to 1 s | 8.6x | 300x | +122L |
E 220 CDI | 600 L | 58 L to 1 s | 8.6x | 279x | +122L |
E 240 T | 600 L | 60 L to 1 s | 8.6x | 250x | +122L |
E 250 T D | 530 L | 34 L to 1 s | 7.4x | 212x | +52L |
E 230 T | 600 L | 57 L to 1 s | 8.6x | 261x | +122L |
E 270 CDI | 600 L | 67 L to 1 s | 8.6x | 223x | +122L |
E 280 T 4-matic | 600 L | 62 L to 1 s | 8.6x | 214x | +122L |
E 280 T | 600 L | 67 L to 1 s | 8.6x | 214x | +122L |
E 290 T Turbo-D | 600 L | 52 L to 1 s | 8.6x | 209x | +122L |
E 320 CDI | 600 L | 71 L to 1 s | 8.6x | 186x | +122L |
E 300 T Turbo-D | 600 L | 67 L to 1 s | 8.6x | 200x | +122L |
E 320 T 4-matic | 600 L | 69 L to 1 s | 8.6x | 188x | +122L |
E 320 T | 600 L | 72 L to 1 s | 8.6x | 188x | +122L |
E 430 4-matic | 600 L | 88 L to 1 s | 8.6x | 141x | +122L |
AMG E 55 T | 600 L | 107 L to 1 s | 8.6x | 110x | +122L |
E 430 T | 600 L | 91 L to 1 s | 8.6x | 141x | +122L |
Vehicle | E 200 T |
---|---|
Trunk space | 600 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 52 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 300x |
Difference with world average | +122L |
Vehicle | E 220 CDI |
Trunk space | 600 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 58 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 279x |
Difference with world average | +122L |
Vehicle | E 240 T |
Trunk space | 600 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 60 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 250x |
Difference with world average | +122L |
Vehicle | E 250 T D |
Trunk space | 530 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 34 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 212x |
Difference with world average | +52L |
Vehicle | E 230 T |
Trunk space | 600 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 57 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 261x |
Difference with world average | +122L |
Vehicle | E 270 CDI |
Trunk space | 600 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 67 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 223x |
Difference with world average | +122L |
Vehicle | E 280 T 4-matic |
Trunk space | 600 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 62 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 214x |
Difference with world average | +122L |
Vehicle | E 280 T |
Trunk space | 600 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 67 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 214x |
Difference with world average | +122L |
Vehicle | E 290 T Turbo-D |
Trunk space | 600 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 52 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 209x |
Difference with world average | +122L |
Vehicle | E 320 CDI |
Trunk space | 600 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 71 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 186x |
Difference with world average | +122L |
Vehicle | E 300 T Turbo-D |
Trunk space | 600 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 67 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 200x |
Difference with world average | +122L |
Vehicle | E 320 T 4-matic |
Trunk space | 600 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 69 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 188x |
Difference with world average | +122L |
Vehicle | E 320 T |
Trunk space | 600 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 72 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 188x |
Difference with world average | +122L |
Vehicle | E 430 4-matic |
Trunk space | 600 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 88 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 141x |
Difference with world average | +122L |
Vehicle | AMG E 55 T |
Trunk space | 600 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 107 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 110x |
Difference with world average | +122L |
Vehicle | E 430 T |
Trunk space | 600 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 91 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 141x |
Difference with world average | +122L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
E 280 | 500 L | 58 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 179x | +22L |
E 200 | 520 L | 48 L to 1 s | 8x | 260x | +42L |
E 200 CDI | 520 L | 44 L to 1 s | 8x | 242x | +42L |
E 220 CDI | 520 L | 53 L to 1 s | 8x | 242x | +42L |
E 220 D | 520 L | 32 L to 1 s | 8x | 241x | +42L |
E 200 Kompressor | 520 L | 61 L to 1 s | 8x | 260x | +42L |
E 230 | 520 L | 52 L to 1 s | 8x | 227x | +42L |
E 240 | 520 L | 57 L to 1 s | 8x | 200x | +42L |
E 270 CDI | 520 L | 56 L to 1 s | 8x | 194x | +42L |
E 280 4-matic | 520 L | 60 L to 1 s | 6.5x | 186x | +42L |
E 300 D | 520 L | 42 L to 1 s | 8x | 174x | +42L |
E 290 Turbo-D | 520 L | 48 L to 1 s | 8x | 181x | +42L |
E 300 Turbo-D | 520 L | 61 L to 1 s | 8x | 174x | +42L |
E 300 TD | 520 L | 50 L to 1 s | 7.4x | 174x | +42L |
E 320 | 500 L | 68 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 156x | +22L |
E 320 CDI | 520 L | 68 L to 1 s | 8x | 161x | +42L |
E 420 | 500 L | 75 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 119x | +22L |
E 320 4-matic | 520 L | 68 L to 1 s | 6.5x | 163x | +42L |
E 430 | 520 L | 91 L to 1 s | 6.5x | 122x | +42L |
AMG E 50 | 500 L | 85 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 101x | +22L |
E 430 4-matic | 520 L | 80 L to 1 s | 6.5x | 122x | +42L |
Vehicle | E 280 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 500 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 58 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 179x |
Difference with world average | +22L |
Vehicle | E 200 |
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 48 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 260x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | E 200 CDI |
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 44 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 242x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | E 220 CDI |
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 53 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 242x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | E 220 D |
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 32 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 241x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | E 200 Kompressor |
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 61 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 260x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | E 230 |
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 52 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 227x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | E 240 |
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 57 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 200x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | E 270 CDI |
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 56 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 194x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | E 280 4-matic |
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 60 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 186x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | E 300 D |
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 42 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 174x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | E 290 Turbo-D |
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 48 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 181x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | E 300 Turbo-D |
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 61 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 174x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | E 300 TD |
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 50 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 174x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | E 320 |
Trunk space | 500 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 68 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 156x |
Difference with world average | +22L |
Vehicle | E 320 CDI |
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 68 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 161x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | E 420 |
Trunk space | 500 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 75 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 119x |
Difference with world average | +22L |
Vehicle | E 320 4-matic |
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 68 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 163x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | E 430 |
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 91 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 122x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | AMG E 50 |
Trunk space | 500 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 85 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 101x |
Difference with world average | +22L |
Vehicle | E 430 4-matic |
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 80 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 122x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
320 E | 520 L | 66 L to 1 s | 7.4x | 163x | +42L |
E 200 | 520 L | 48 L to 1 s | 7.4x | 260x | +42L |
E 220 | 520 L | 51 L to 1 s | 7.4x | 236x | +42L |
E 200 D | 520 L | 30 L to 1 s | 7.4x | 260x | +42L |
E 250 D Lang | 390 L | 23 L to 1 s | 5.4x | 156x | -88L |
E 280 | 520 L | 60 L to 1 s | 7.4x | 186x | +42L |
E 300 4-matic | 520 L | 60 L to 1 s | 7.4x | 176x | +42L |
E 280 long | 390 L | - | 5.4x | 139x | -88L |
E 300 Turbo-D | 520 L | 50 L to 1 s | 7.4x | 174x | +42L |
E 300 D | 520 L | 43 L to 1 s | 7.4x | 174x | +42L |
E 300 Turbo-D 4-matic | 520 L | 46 L to 1 s | 7.4x | 174x | +42L |
E 320 | 520 L | 66 L to 1 s | 7.4x | 163x | +42L |
E 420 | 520 L | 76 L to 1 s | 7.4x | 124x | +42L |
500E | 485 L | 81 L to 1 s | 5.4x | 98x | +7L |
E 500 | 485 L | 84 L to 1 s | 5.4x | 98x | +7L |
AMG E 60 | 500 L | 98 L to 1 s | 5.6x | 84x | +22L |
Vehicle | 320 E |
---|---|
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 66 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 163x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | E 200 |
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 48 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 260x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | E 220 |
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 51 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 236x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | E 200 D |
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 30 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 260x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | E 250 D Lang |
Trunk space | 390 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 23 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 156x |
Difference with world average | -88L |
Vehicle | E 280 |
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 60 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 186x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | E 300 4-matic |
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 60 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 176x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | E 280 long |
Trunk space | 390 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 139x |
Difference with world average | -88L |
Vehicle | E 300 Turbo-D |
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 50 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 174x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | E 300 D |
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 43 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 174x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | E 300 Turbo-D 4-matic |
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 46 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 174x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | E 320 |
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 66 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 163x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | E 420 |
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 76 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 124x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | 500E |
Trunk space | 485 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 81 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 98x |
Difference with world average | +7L |
Vehicle | E 500 |
Trunk space | 485 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 84 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 98x |
Difference with world average | +7L |
Vehicle | AMG E 60 |
Trunk space | 500 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 98 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 84x |
Difference with world average | +22L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
E 200 | 480 L | 44 L to 1 s | 6.9x | 240x | +2L |
E 220 | 480 L | 48 L to 1 s | 6.9x | 218x | +2L |
E 320 | 480 L | 61 L to 1 s | 6.9x | 150x | +2L |
Vehicle | E 200 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 480 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 44 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 240x |
Difference with world average | +2L |
Vehicle | E 220 |
Trunk space | 480 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 48 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 218x |
Difference with world average | +2L |
Vehicle | E 320 |
Trunk space | 480 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 61 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 150x |
Difference with world average | +2L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
E 200 | 300 L | 24 L to 1 s | 4.3x | 150x | -178L |
E 220 | 300 L | 27 L to 1 s | 4.3x | 136x | -178L |
E 320 | 300 L | 34 L to 1 s | 4.3x | 94x | -178L |
Vehicle | E 200 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 300 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 24 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 150x |
Difference with world average | -178L |
Vehicle | E 220 |
Trunk space | 300 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 27 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 136x |
Difference with world average | -178L |
Vehicle | E 320 |
Trunk space | 300 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 34 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 94x |
Difference with world average | -178L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
E 200 T | 530 L | 46 L to 1 s | 7.4x | 265x | +52L |
E 220 T | 530 L | 50 L to 1 s | 7.4x | 241x | +52L |
E 280 T | 530 L | 60 L to 1 s | 7.4x | 189x | +52L |
E 250 T D | 530 L | 34 L to 1 s | 7.4x | 212x | +52L |
E 300 T 4-matic | 530 L | 57 L to 1 s | 7.4x | 179x | +52L |
E 300 T D | 530 L | 41 L to 1 s | 7.4x | 177x | +52L |
E 300 T Turbo-D | 530 L | 51 L to 1 s | 7.4x | 177x | +52L |
E 300 T Turbo-D 4-matic | 530 L | 51 L to 1 s | 7.4x | 177x | +52L |
E 320 T | 530 L | 65 L to 1 s | 7.4x | 166x | +52L |
Vehicle | E 200 T |
---|---|
Trunk space | 530 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 46 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 265x |
Difference with world average | +52L |
Vehicle | E 220 T |
Trunk space | 530 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 50 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 241x |
Difference with world average | +52L |
Vehicle | E 280 T |
Trunk space | 530 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 60 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 189x |
Difference with world average | +52L |
Vehicle | E 250 T D |
Trunk space | 530 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 34 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 212x |
Difference with world average | +52L |
Vehicle | E 300 T 4-matic |
Trunk space | 530 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 57 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 179x |
Difference with world average | +52L |
Vehicle | E 300 T D |
Trunk space | 530 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 41 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 177x |
Difference with world average | +52L |
Vehicle | E 300 T Turbo-D |
Trunk space | 530 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 51 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 177x |
Difference with world average | +52L |
Vehicle | E 300 T Turbo-D 4-matic |
Trunk space | 530 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 51 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 177x |
Difference with world average | +52L |
Vehicle | E 320 T |
Trunk space | 530 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 65 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 166x |
Difference with world average | +52L |