Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
114 CDI | 580 L | - | 10.2x | 271x | +102L |
116 CDI | 580 L | - | 10.2x | 271x | +102L |
119 CDI | 580 L | - | 10.2x | 271x | +102L |
110 CDI | 580 L | - | 10.2x | 332x | +102L |
Vehicle | 114 CDI |
---|---|
Trunk space | 580 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 271x |
Difference with world average | +102L |
Vehicle | 116 CDI |
Trunk space | 580 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 271x |
Difference with world average | +102L |
Vehicle | 119 CDI |
Trunk space | 580 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 271x |
Difference with world average | +102L |
Vehicle | 110 CDI |
Trunk space | 580 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 332x |
Difference with world average | +102L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
114 CDI | 990 L | - | 17.4x | 462x | +512L |
116 CDI | 990 L | - | 17.4x | 462x | +512L |
119 CDI | 990 L | - | 17.4x | 462x | +512L |
110 CDI | 990 L | - | 17.4x | 566x | +512L |
Vehicle | 114 CDI |
---|---|
Trunk space | 990 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 17.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 462x |
Difference with world average | +512L |
Vehicle | 116 CDI |
Trunk space | 990 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 17.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 462x |
Difference with world average | +512L |
Vehicle | 119 CDI |
Trunk space | 990 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 17.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 462x |
Difference with world average | +512L |
Vehicle | 110 CDI |
Trunk space | 990 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 17.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 566x |
Difference with world average | +512L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
114 CDI | 1390 L | - | 24.4x | 649x | +912L |
116 CDI | 1390 L | - | 24.4x | 649x | +912L |
119 CDI | 1390 L | - | 24.4x | 649x | +912L |
110 CDI | 1390 L | - | 24.4x | 795x | +912L |
Vehicle | 114 CDI |
---|---|
Trunk space | 1390 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 24.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 649x |
Difference with world average | +912L |
Vehicle | 116 CDI |
Trunk space | 1390 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 24.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 649x |
Difference with world average | +912L |
Vehicle | 119 CDI |
Trunk space | 1390 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 24.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 649x |
Difference with world average | +912L |
Vehicle | 110 CDI |
Trunk space | 1390 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 24.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 795x |
Difference with world average | +912L |