cat_logo
HomeMercury

Tracer

Mercury Tracer Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Choose Generation

Quick notes on Mercury Tracer trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 444 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 9.9 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 4.4 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 88.8 L
    • Max trunk load: 64 kg
    • Interior transformation: limited
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 4.5 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 2.8 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.9 : 6 L/hp (8.1 L/kW)
  • 2.0 : 3.2 L/hp (4.4 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.9 : 3.1 L/km-h (1.93 L/mph)
  • 2.0 : 1.95 L/km-h (1.21 L/mph)

    Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.9 527 L - 10.5x 283x +49L
    2.0 360 L - 7.5x 181x -118L
    Vehicle 1.9
    Trunk space 527 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 10.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 283x
    Difference with world average +49L
    Vehicle 2.0
    Trunk space 360 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 181x
    Difference with world average -118L

    Quick notes on Mercury Tracer trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 865 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 19.2 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 8.7 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 173 L
      • Max trunk load: 68 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 8.7 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 5.5 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 10 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.9 : 9.8 L/hp (13.3 L/kW)
  • 2.0 : 7.8 L/hp (10.5 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.9 : 5.09 L/km-h (3.16 L/mph)
  • 2.0 : 4.94 L/km-h (3.07 L/mph)

    Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.9 865 L - 18x 465x +387L
    2.0 865 L - 18x 435x +387L
    Vehicle 1.9
    Trunk space 865 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 18x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 465x
    Difference with world average +387L
    Vehicle 2.0
    Trunk space 865 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 18x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 435x
    Difference with world average +387L